Literature DB >> 22971753

Within-visit blood pressure variability: relevant factors in the general population.

J H Shin1, J Shin, B K Kim, Y-H Lim, H-C Park, S I Choi, S G Kim, J H Kim.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to use a nationwide epidemiological survey to investigate the factors that affect within-visit blood pressure (BP) variability. We analyzed the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHNES) data for 2005 (n=5488). We examined three within-visit BP variability parameters that include the following: the alarm reaction (AR), defined as the first BP reading minus the third BP reading; the BP discrepancy, defined as the maximal BP reading minus the minimal BP reading (ΔBPmax); and the s.d. (BPSD). Age, fasting glucose, eGFR, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and the metabolic syndrome (MetS) score were the relevant factors that affected the systolic AR, ΔSBPmax and SBPSD. Multiple linear regression models revealed that age (P<0.0001), the office systolic BP (SBP) level (P<0.0001), the MetS score (P<0.0001), the female gender (P=0.007) and the eGFR (P=0.049) were independently associated with the systolic AR, whereas age (P<0.0001), the office SBP level (P<0.0001), and the female gender (P=0.024 and 0.022) were independently associated with ΔSBPmax and SBPSD, respectively. Within-visit BP variability, especially the variability associated with the SBP, was significantly associated with increased age, female gender and cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, low eGFR and adverse glucose and lipid profiles. In addition, increased age, female gender, the eGFR and the MetS score were independently relevant factors that affected the systolic AR. Systolic within-visit BP variability and systolic AR are associated with cardiovascular risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22971753     DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2012.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  9 in total

1.  Regional Fat Distribution and Blood Pressure Level and Variability: The Dallas Heart Study.

Authors:  Yuichiro Yano; Wanpen Vongpatanasin; Colby Ayers; Aslan Turer; Alvin Chandra; Mercedes R Carnethon; Philip Greenland; James A de Lemos; Ian J Neeland
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Relationship between Within-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Skeletal Muscle Mass.

Authors:  K-I Kim; M-G Kang; S-J Yoon; J-Y Choi; S-W Kim; C-H Kim
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Factors affecting variability in home blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: post hoc analysis of a cross-sectional multicenter study.

Authors:  E Ushigome; M Fukui; M Hamaguchi; T Tanaka; H Atsuta; S-i Mogami; Y Oda; M Yamazaki; G Hasegawa; N Nakamura
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Within-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Cardiovascular Risk in ELSA-Brasil Study Participants.

Authors:  André Sant'Anna Zarife; Helena Fraga-Maia; José Geraldo Mill; Paulo Lotufo; Rosane Harter Griep; Maria de Jesus Mendes da Fonseca; Luciara Leite Brito; Maria da Conceição Almeida; Roque Aras; Sheila Maria Alvim Matos
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.667

5.  Within-visit blood pressure variability is associated with prediabetes and diabetes.

Authors:  Rieko Okada; Yoshinari Yasuda; Kazuyo Tsushita; Kenji Wakai; Nobuyuki Hamajima; Seiichi Matsuo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Determinants of the Morning-Evening Home Blood Pressure Difference in Treated Hypertensives: The HIBA-Home Study.

Authors:  Lucas S Aparicio; Jessica Barochiner; Paula E Cuffaro; José Alfie; Marcelo A Rada; Margarita S Morales; Carlos R Galarza; Marcos J Marín; Gabriel D Waisman
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.420

7.  Association between within-visit systolic blood pressure variability and development of pre-diabetes and diabetes among overweight/obese individuals.

Authors:  Kaumudi J Joshipura; Francisco J Muñoz-Torres; Maribel Campos; Alba D Rivera-Díaz; Juan C Zevallos
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.012

8.  Effects of single pill-based combination therapy of amlodipine and atorvastatin on within-visit blood pressure variability and parameters of renal and vascular function in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Kengo Azushima; Kazushi Uneda; Kouichi Tamura; Hiromichi Wakui; Masato Ohsawa; Ryu Kobayashi; Toru Dejima; Tomohiko Kanaoka; Akinobu Maeda; Yoshiyuki Toya; Satoshi Umemura
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure changes from the initial values on two different days.

Authors:  Garrett I Ash; Timothy J Walker; Kayla M Olson; Jeffrey H Stratton; Ana L Gómez; William J Kraemer; Jeff S Volek; Linda S Pescatello
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.365

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.