Literature DB >> 22971086

On-line changing of thinking about words: the effect of cognitive context on neural responses to verb reading.

Liuba Papeo1, Raffaella Ida Rumiati, Cinzia Cecchetto, Barbara Tomasino.   

Abstract

Activity in frontocentral motor regions is routinely reported when individuals process action words and is often interpreted as the implicit simulation of the word content. We hypothesized that these neural responses are not invariant components of action word processing but are modulated by the context in which they are evoked. Using fMRI, we assessed the relative weight of stimulus features (i.e., the intrinsic semantics of words) and contextual factors, in eliciting word-related sensorimotor activity. Participants silently read action-related and state verbs after performing a mental rotation task engaging either a motor strategy (i.e., referring visual stimuli to their own bodily movements) or a visuospatial strategy. The mental rotation tasks were used to induce, respectively, a motor and a nonmotor "cognitive context" into the following silent reading. Irrespective of the verb category, reading in the motor context, compared with reading in the nonmotor context, increased the activity in the left primary motor cortex, the bilateral premotor cortex, and the right somatosensory cortex. Thus, the cognitive context induced by the preceding motor strategy-based mental rotation modulated word-related sensorimotor responses, possibly reflecting the strategy of referring a word meaning to one's own bodily activity. This pattern, common to action and state verbs, suggests that the context in which words are encountered prevails over the intrinsic semantics of the stimuli in mediating the recruitment of sensorimotor regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22971086     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  17 in total

1.  Passive reading and motor imagery about hand actions and tool-use actions: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Hua Shu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Are the motor features of verb meanings represented in the precentral motor cortices? Yes, but within the context of a flexible, multilevel architecture for conceptual knowledge.

Authors:  David Kemmerer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

3.  Concepts within reach: Action performance predicts action language processing in stroke.

Authors:  Rutvik H Desai; Troy Herter; Nicholas Riccardi; Chris Rorden; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  At the mercy of strategies: the role of motor representations in language understanding.

Authors:  Barbara Tomasino; Raffaella Ida Rumiati
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-04

Review 5.  Influences of motor contexts on the semantic processing of action-related language.

Authors:  Jie Yang
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.526

6.  How the context matters. Literal and figurative meaning in the embodied language paradigm.

Authors:  Valentina Cuccio; Marianna Ambrosecchia; Francesca Ferri; Marco Carapezza; Franco Lo Piparo; Leonardo Fogassi; Vittorio Gallese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Seeking a bridge between language and motor cortices: a PPI study.

Authors:  Marta Maieron; Dario Marin; Franco Fabbro; Miran Skrap
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Disrupting the brain to validate hypotheses on the neurobiology of language.

Authors:  Liuba Papeo; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity.

Authors:  Pia Aravena; Mélody Courson; Victor Frak; Anne Cheylus; Yves Paulignan; Viviane Deprez; Tatjana A Nazir
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The Cognitive Side of M1.

Authors:  Barbara Tomasino; Michele Gremese
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.