Literature DB >> 22970939

Stage-specific impact of extended versus standard pelvic lymph node dissection in radical cystectomy.

Giuseppe Simone1, Rocco Papalia, Mariaconsiglia Ferriero, Salvatore Guaglianone, Emanuele Castelli, Devis Collura, Giovanni Muto, Michele Gallucci.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of an extended versus a standard pelvic lymph node dissection on disease-free survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with non-metastatic muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder treated with radical cystectomy.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of 933 patients collected in two prospectively-maintained institutional databases between 2002 and 2010. Patients who met inclusion criteria (high-grade urothelial carcinoma, have not undergone neoadjuvant treatments, have not undergone salvage cystectomy) were included for analysis. The upper boundary was the iliac bifurcation for standard lymph-node dissection and the aortic bifurcation for the extended lymph node dissection, respectively. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were carried out to identify independent predictors of disease-free survival and cancer-specific survival and, subsequently, the effect of extended lymph node dissection was determined with a multivariable Cox analysis after stratifying for significant covariates.
RESULTS: At multivariable analysis, once adjusted for the effect of the other covariates, extended lymph node dissection was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (hazard ratio 1.95, P < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio 1.80, P < 0.001). The benefit of an extended pelvic lymph node dissection on disease-free survival and cancer-specific survival was significant across all pT stages (all P < 0.05) except for pT <2 and across all pN stages (pN = 0, P = 0.011 and P = 0.034 for disease-free survival and cancer-specific survival, respectively; pN1 and pN2, all P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The staging accuracy and the survival benefit provided by extended pelvic lymph node dissection suggests the adoption of this template as the standard template for patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder undergoing radical cystectomy.
© 2012 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22970939     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03148.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  24 in total

1.  Balancing risk and benefit of extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  H Abdi; F Pourmalek; M E Gleave; A I So; P C Black
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  [Short version of the German S3 guideline for bladder cancer].

Authors:  M Retz; J E Gschwend; P Maisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Are we really seeking for equivalence?-The virtue of the robot is in technology.

Authors:  Aldo Brassetti; Riccardo Mastroianni; Giuseppe Simone
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

Review 4.  Lymph node dissection in bladder cancer: Where do we stand?

Authors:  Cory M Hugen; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for bladder cancer treatment: considerations on relevance and extent.

Authors:  Lars Weisbach; Roland Dahlem; Giuseppe Simone; Jens Hansen; Armin Soave; Oliver Engel; Felix K Chun; Shahrokh F Shariat; Margit Fisch; Michael Rink
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  The Challenge of Managing Bladder Cancer and Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Review with Treatment Recommendations from the Spanish Oncology Genitourinary Group (SOGUG).

Authors:  Albert Font; Raquel Luque; José Carlos Villa; Montse Domenech; Sergio Vázquez; Enrique Gallardo; Juan Antonio Virizuela; Carmen Beato; Rafael Morales-Barrera; Antoni Gelabert; Sonia Maciá; Javier Puente; Gustavo Rubio; Xavier Maldonado; Begoña Perez-Valderrama; Alvaro Pinto; Ovidio Fernández Calvo; Enrique Grande; Javier Garde-Noguera; Eva Fernández-Parra; José Ángel Arranz
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.493

7.  Development and external validation of nomograms predicting disease-free and cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Simone; Marco Bianchi; Diana Giannarelli; Siamak Daneshmand; Rocco Papalia; Mariaconsiglia Ferriero; Salvatore Guaglianone; Steno Sentinelli; Renzo Colombo; Francesco Montorsi; Devis Collura; Giovanni Muto; Giacomo Novara; Rodolfo Hurle; Michael Rink; Margit Fisch; Hassan Abol-Enein; Gus Miranda; Mihir Desai; Inderbir Gill; Michele Gallucci
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  The role of extended lymph node dissection in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Victoria Dawson; Mriganka Sinha; Julian Smith; Bhaskar K Somani; James Douglas
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-09

Review 9.  Landmarks in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Niyati Lobo; Chloe Mount; Kawa Omar; Rajesh Nair; Ramesh Thurairaja; Muhammad Shamim Khan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Predictive Nomogram and Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Zijian Tian; Lingfeng Meng; Xin Wang; Tongxiang Diao; Maolin Hu; Miao Wang; Yaqun Zhang; Ming Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.