Literature DB >> 22969663

2-Amino-5-methyl-pyridinium dibromo-iodate.

Salim F Haddad, Basem F Ali, Rawhi Al-Far.   

Abstract

In the title salt, C(6)H(9)N(2) (+)·Br(2)I(-), the cation is essentially planar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0062 Å for the non-H atoms) while the anion is almost linear with a Br-I-Br angle of 177.67 (2)°. The crystal packing shows two anions and two cations connected via N-H⋯Br and (pyridine)N-H⋯Br hydrogen-bonding inter-actions, forming centrosymmetric tetra-mers with R(4) (4)(16) ring motifs. Very weak offset aromatic π-π stacking interactions [centroid-centroid separation = 4.038 (4), slippage = 1.773 Å] also occur.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22969663      PMCID: PMC3435817          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812036136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to this study, see: Al-Far et al. (2012 ▶); Kochel (2006 ▶). For comparison bond lengths and angles, see: Gardberg et al. (2002 ▶); Hemamalini & Fun (2010 ▶). For graph-set notation, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H9N2 +·Br2I M = 395.85 Triclinic, a = 8.3648 (13) Å b = 8.4233 (16) Å c = 9.2321 (16) Å α = 105.107 (16)° β = 115.371 (16)° γ = 98.241 (15)° V = 542.7 (2) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 10.26 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.54 × 0.39 × 0.30 mm

Data collection

Agilent Xcalibur Eos diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011 ▶) T min = 0.011, T max = 0.045 4283 measured reflections 2465 independent reflections 1777 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.029

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.040 wR(F 2) = 0.096 S = 1.01 2465 reflections 102 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 1.17 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.85 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812036136/pv2581sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812036136/pv2581Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H9N2+·Br2IZ = 2
Mr = 395.85F(000) = 364
Triclinic, P1Dx = 2.422 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 8.3648 (13) ÅCell parameters from 1406 reflections
b = 8.4233 (16) Åθ = 3.2–30.0°
c = 9.2321 (16) ŵ = 10.26 mm1
α = 105.107 (16)°T = 293 K
β = 115.371 (16)°Plate, yellow
γ = 98.241 (15)°0.54 × 0.39 × 0.30 mm
V = 542.7 (2) Å3
Agilent Xcalibur Eos diffractometer2465 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source1777 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.029
Detector resolution: 16.0534 pixels mm-1θmax = 29.1°, θmin = 3.2°
ω scansh = −11→10
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011)k = −11→11
Tmin = 0.011, Tmax = 0.045l = −10→12
4283 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.096w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.035P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.01(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2465 reflectionsΔρmax = 1.17 e Å3
102 parametersΔρmin = −0.85 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0292 (12)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N11.0416 (7)0.3049 (7)0.7106 (6)0.0606 (15)
H1A1.03870.33310.80570.073*
I10.70649 (5)−0.04784 (5)0.90281 (5)0.04214 (17)
Br10.55742 (10)−0.38624 (9)0.80942 (10)0.0661 (2)
N20.7745 (7)0.3836 (7)0.5894 (7)0.0699 (17)
H2A0.77510.41210.68620.084*
H2B0.68820.39470.50210.084*
C20.9069 (8)0.3223 (8)0.5748 (8)0.0509 (16)
Br20.85761 (10)0.29148 (9)0.98508 (9)0.0589 (2)
C30.9133 (8)0.2686 (8)0.4207 (8)0.0500 (15)
H3A0.82240.27490.32110.060*
C41.0533 (8)0.2076 (9)0.4194 (8)0.0551 (17)
H4A1.05620.17280.31660.066*
C51.1936 (8)0.1936 (8)0.5625 (7)0.0438 (14)
C61.1819 (9)0.2455 (9)0.7061 (9)0.0591 (18)
H6A1.27320.24060.80640.071*
C71.3488 (8)0.1264 (9)0.5598 (9)0.0647 (19)
H7A1.43290.13350.67340.097*
H7B1.41300.19380.52110.097*
H7C1.29990.00870.48300.097*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.077 (4)0.061 (4)0.032 (3)0.007 (3)0.025 (3)0.008 (3)
I10.0468 (3)0.0479 (3)0.0301 (2)0.01598 (19)0.01656 (19)0.01427 (19)
Br10.0739 (5)0.0464 (4)0.0580 (5)0.0088 (4)0.0210 (4)0.0132 (4)
N20.076 (4)0.076 (5)0.060 (4)0.019 (3)0.039 (3)0.019 (4)
C20.052 (3)0.050 (4)0.046 (4)0.002 (3)0.023 (3)0.018 (3)
Br20.0794 (5)0.0461 (4)0.0465 (4)0.0117 (4)0.0284 (4)0.0173 (4)
C30.054 (4)0.054 (4)0.038 (4)0.011 (3)0.023 (3)0.014 (3)
C40.062 (4)0.058 (4)0.041 (4)0.008 (3)0.026 (3)0.014 (3)
C50.049 (3)0.042 (4)0.031 (3)0.005 (3)0.013 (3)0.015 (3)
C60.060 (4)0.064 (5)0.040 (4)0.013 (4)0.016 (3)0.016 (4)
C70.063 (4)0.069 (5)0.057 (5)0.022 (4)0.023 (4)0.025 (4)
N1—C21.340 (7)C3—H3A0.9300
N1—C61.352 (8)C4—C51.389 (8)
N1—H1A0.8600C4—H4A0.9300
I1—Br12.6836 (10)C5—C61.334 (8)
I1—Br22.7119 (10)C5—C71.496 (8)
N2—C21.330 (7)C6—H6A0.9300
N2—H2A0.8600C7—H7A0.9600
N2—H2B0.8600C7—H7B0.9600
C2—C31.402 (8)C7—H7C0.9600
C3—C41.348 (8)
C2—N1—C6123.5 (5)C3—C4—H4A118.0
C2—N1—H1A118.3C5—C4—H4A118.0
C6—N1—H1A118.3C6—C5—C4115.2 (6)
Br1—I1—Br2177.67 (2)C6—C5—C7121.3 (6)
C2—N2—H2A120.0C4—C5—C7123.5 (5)
C2—N2—H2B120.0C5—C6—N1122.1 (6)
H2A—N2—H2B120.0C5—C6—H6A118.9
N2—C2—N1120.1 (6)N1—C6—H6A118.9
N2—C2—C3123.6 (6)C5—C7—H7A109.5
N1—C2—C3116.3 (6)C5—C7—H7B109.5
C4—C3—C2118.9 (6)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
C4—C3—H3A120.5C5—C7—H7C109.5
C2—C3—H3A120.5H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C3—C4—C5123.9 (6)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
C6—N1—C2—N2−179.2 (6)C3—C4—C5—C60.0 (10)
C6—N1—C2—C32.4 (9)C3—C4—C5—C7−179.7 (6)
N2—C2—C3—C4−179.7 (6)C4—C5—C6—N11.0 (10)
N1—C2—C3—C4−1.4 (9)C7—C5—C6—N1−179.3 (6)
C2—C3—C4—C50.3 (10)C2—N1—C6—C5−2.3 (10)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···Br20.862.733.499 (5)150
N2—H2B···Br1i0.862.703.545 (6)168
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Br20.862.733.499 (5)150
N2—H2B⋯Br1i 0.862.703.545 (6)168

Symmetry code: (i) .

  4 in total

1.  Synthesis and structural characterization of integrally oxidized, metal-free phthalocyanine compounds: [H(2)(pc)][IBr(2)] and [H(2)(pc)](2)[IBr(2)]Br.C(10)H(7)Br.

Authors:  Anna S Gardberg; Syaulan Yang; Brian M Hoffman; James A Ibers
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2002-04-08       Impact factor: 5.165

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  2-Amino-5-methyl-pyridinium 2-carb-oxy-benzoate.

Authors:  Madhukar Hemamalini; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-08-04

4.  Bis(2,6-dimethyl-pyridinium) dibromo-iodate bromide.

Authors:  Rawhi Al-Far; Basem F Ali; Salim F Haddad
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-08-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.