Literature DB >> 22969581

4-Bromo-1H-pyrrole-2-carb-oxy-lic acid.

Le Zheng1, Fang Hu, Xiang Chao Zeng, Kai Ping Li.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(5)H(4)BrNO(2), the non-H atoms of the pyrrole ring and the Br atom are approximately coplanar, with an r.m.s. deviation from the best fit plane of 0.025 (6) Å;. The dihedral angle between the plane of the carb-oxy group and this plane is 14.1 (2)°. In the crystal, O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the mol-ecules together, forming corrugated sheets parallel to the bc plane.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22969581      PMCID: PMC3435710          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812034800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For pyrrole compounds obtained from marine organisms, see: Liu et al. (2005 ▶); Faulkner (2002 ▶). For the bioactivity of pyrrole derivatives, see: Banwell et al. (2006 ▶); Sosa et al. (2002 ▶). For related structures, see: Zeng et al. (2007 ▶); Tang et al. (2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C5H4BrNO2 M = 190.00 Monoclinic, a = 16.0028 (13) Å b = 4.9046 (6) Å c = 8.2367 (7) Å β = 93.199 (7)° V = 645.47 (11) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 6.29 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.24 × 0.20 × 0.14 mm

Data collection

Oxford Gemini S Ultra area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2010 ▶) T min = 0.314, T max = 0.473 2436 measured reflections 1387 independent reflections 1081 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.021

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.034 wR(F 2) = 0.081 S = 1.10 1387 reflections 85 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.39 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.45 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2010 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812034800/fj2579sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812034800/fj2579Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812034800/fj2579Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C5H4BrNO2F(000) = 368
Mr = 190.00Dx = 1.955 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMelting point < 424 K
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 16.0028 (13) ÅCell parameters from 950 reflections
b = 4.9046 (6) Åθ = 3.5–29.1°
c = 8.2367 (7) ŵ = 6.29 mm1
β = 93.199 (7)°T = 293 K
V = 645.47 (11) Å3Block, light yellow
Z = 40.24 × 0.20 × 0.14 mm
Oxford Gemini S Ultra area-detector diffractometer1387 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1081 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.021
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.0°, θmin = 3.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2010)h = −20→12
Tmin = 0.314, Tmax = 0.473k = −5→6
2436 measured reflectionsl = −10→10
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.081H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.10w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.034P)2 + 0.2705P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1387 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
85 parametersΔρmax = 0.39 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.45 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Br10.07690 (2)0.68153 (9)−0.16395 (4)0.04763 (17)
N10.24925 (19)0.3185 (6)0.1354 (4)0.0400 (7)
H10.26530.19830.20650.048*
C30.2505 (2)0.6756 (8)−0.0297 (4)0.0321 (7)
H30.26740.8285−0.08610.039*
O10.40382 (15)0.4281 (6)0.2816 (3)0.0514 (7)
C40.29799 (19)0.5248 (7)0.0817 (4)0.0321 (8)
C20.17094 (19)0.5519 (8)−0.0414 (4)0.0327 (8)
O20.4311 (2)0.7498 (8)0.0940 (4)0.0731 (10)
H20.40790.80990.01020.013 (15)*0.50
H2'0.48980.79730.15620.009 (13)*0.50
C10.1716 (2)0.3316 (8)0.0598 (5)0.0421 (9)
H1A0.12740.21280.07430.050*
C50.3821 (2)0.5608 (9)0.1583 (4)0.0373 (8)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0310 (2)0.0638 (3)0.0466 (2)0.00130 (19)−0.01071 (15)0.0010 (2)
N10.0398 (17)0.0338 (17)0.0453 (16)0.0004 (15)−0.0077 (13)0.0041 (15)
C30.0309 (17)0.037 (2)0.0284 (15)−0.0035 (16)−0.0004 (12)0.0005 (16)
O10.0376 (14)0.0662 (19)0.0487 (14)0.0089 (14)−0.0119 (11)0.0072 (15)
C40.0274 (15)0.036 (2)0.0329 (15)0.0019 (15)−0.0013 (12)−0.0050 (16)
C20.0279 (16)0.041 (2)0.0289 (15)0.0017 (16)−0.0025 (12)−0.0053 (17)
O20.052 (2)0.097 (3)0.069 (2)−0.0130 (18)−0.0158 (16)0.004 (2)
C10.0357 (19)0.042 (2)0.048 (2)−0.0074 (17)−0.0006 (16)−0.0045 (19)
C50.0278 (17)0.048 (2)0.0357 (17)0.0020 (18)−0.0038 (13)−0.0053 (19)
Br1—C21.876 (3)O1—C51.239 (4)
N1—C11.360 (5)C4—C51.465 (4)
N1—C41.366 (4)C2—C11.364 (5)
N1—H10.8600O2—C51.342 (5)
C3—C41.375 (5)O2—H20.8200
C3—C21.408 (4)O2—H2'1.0702
C3—H30.9300C1—H1A0.9300
C1—N1—C4109.9 (3)C3—C2—Br1125.8 (3)
C1—N1—H1125.1C5—O2—H2109.5
C4—N1—H1125.1C5—O2—H2'118.5
C4—C3—C2106.1 (3)H2—O2—H2'132.0
C4—C3—H3126.9N1—C1—C2107.1 (3)
C2—C3—H3126.9N1—C1—H1A126.5
N1—C4—C3108.1 (3)C2—C1—H1A126.5
N1—C4—C5118.5 (3)O1—C5—O2122.9 (3)
C3—C4—C5133.1 (3)O1—C5—C4119.9 (3)
C1—C2—C3108.8 (3)O2—C5—C4117.1 (3)
C1—C2—Br1125.2 (3)
C1—N1—C4—C30.6 (4)C3—C2—C1—N10.8 (4)
C1—N1—C4—C5175.0 (3)Br1—C2—C1—N1−175.1 (2)
C2—C3—C4—N1−0.1 (4)N1—C4—C5—O1−8.7 (5)
C2—C3—C4—C5−173.3 (3)C3—C4—C5—O1163.9 (4)
C4—C3—C2—C1−0.5 (4)N1—C4—C5—O2174.5 (3)
C4—C3—C2—Br1175.4 (2)C3—C4—C5—O2−12.8 (6)
C4—N1—C1—C2−0.9 (4)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2′···O1i1.071.862.914 (4)166
O2—H2···O1ii0.822.283.030 (4)153
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H2′⋯O1i 1.071.862.914 (4)166
O2—H2⋯O1ii 0.822.283.030 (4)153

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  5 in total

Review 1.  Marine natural products.

Authors:  D John Faulkner
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 13.423

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Methyl (1H-pyrrol-2-ylcarbonyl-amino)acetate.

Authors:  Gui Hong Tang; Dong Dong Li; Xiang Chao Zeng; Shi Song Dong; Yan Shuang Wang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-09-06

4.  Synthesis of axinohydantoins.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Barrios Sosa; Kenichi Yakushijin; David A Horne
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 4.354

5.  4,5-Diaryl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylates as combretastatin A-4/lamellarin T hybrids: synthesis and evaluation as anti-mitotic and cytotoxic agents.

Authors:  Martin G Banwell; Ernest Hamel; David C R Hockless; Pascal Verdier-Pinard; Anthony C Willis; David J Wong
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.641

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.