Literature DB >> 35970658

A Comprehensive Motion Compensation Method for In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Motion in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Focal Liver Lesions.

Thodsawit Tiyarattanachai1, Simona Turco2, John R Eisenbrey3, Corinne E Wessner3, Alexandra Medellin-Kowalewski4, Stephanie Wilson5, Andrej Lyshchik3, Aya Kamaya6, Ahmed El Kaffas7.   

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) acquisitions of focal liver lesions are affected by motion, which has an impact on contrast signal quantification. We therefore developed and tested, in a large patient cohort, a motion compensation algorithm called the Iterative Local Search Algorithm (ILSA), which can correct for both periodic and non-periodic in-plane motion and can reject frames with out-of-plane motion. CEUS cines of 183 focal liver lesions in 155 patients from three hospitals were used to develop and test ILSA. Performance was evaluated through quantitative metrics, including the root mean square error and R2 in fitting time-intensity curves and standard deviation value of B-mode intensities, computed across cine frames), and qualitative evaluation, including B-mode mean intensity projection images and parametric perfusion imaging. The median root mean square error significantly decreased from 0.032 to 0.024 (p < 0.001). Median R2 significantly increased from 0.88 to 0.93 (p < 0.001). The median standard deviation value of B-mode intensities significantly decreased from 6.2 to 5.0 (p < 0.001). B-Mode mean intensity projection images revealed improved spatial resolution. Parametric perfusion imaging also exhibited improved spatial detail and better differentiation between lesion and background liver parenchyma. ILSA can compensate for all types of motion encountered during liver CEUS, potentially improving contrast signal quantification of focal liver lesions.
Copyright © 2022 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Focal liver lesion; Motion compensation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35970658      PMCID: PMC9529818          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   3.694


  19 in total

Review 1.  Indicator dilution models for the quantification of microvascular blood flow with bolus administration of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Costas Strouthos; Marios Lampaskis; Vassilis Sboros; Alan McNeilly; Michalakis Averkiou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Semi-automatic motion compensation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound images from abdominal organs for perfusion analysis.

Authors:  Sebastian Schäfer; Kim Nylund; Fredrik Sævik; Trond Engjom; Martin Mézl; Radovan Jiřík; Georg Dimcevski; Odd Helge Gilja; Klaus Tönnies
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.589

3.  An EFSUMB introduction into Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCE-US) for quantification of tumour perfusion.

Authors:  C F Dietrich; M A Averkiou; J-M Correas; N Lassau; E Leen; F Piscaglia
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 6.548

4.  Respiratory motion correction for liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound by automatic selection of a reference image.

Authors:  Ji Zhang; Yanrong Zhang; Juan Chen; Gonghao Ling; Xiangyu Wang; Haibo Xu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Quantification: From Kinetic Modeling to Machine Learning.

Authors:  Simona Turco; Peter Frinking; Rogier Wildeboer; Marcel Arditi; Hessel Wijkstra; Jonathan R Lindner; Massimo Mischi
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Differentiation of focal liver lesions: usefulness of parametric imaging with contrast-enhanced US.

Authors:  Anass Anaye; Geneviève Perrenoud; Nicolas Rognin; Marcel Arditi; Laurent Mercier; Peter Frinking; Christiane Ruffieux; Philippe Peetrons; Reto Meuli; Jean-Yves Meuwly
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  A new automated quantification algorithm for the detection and evaluation of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Ilias Gatos; Stavros Tsantis; Stavros Spiliopoulos; Aikaterini Skouroliakou; Ioannis Theotokas; Pavlos Zoumpoulis; John D Hazle; George C Kagadis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Usefulness of contrast enhanced ultrasound in monitoring therapeutic response after hepatocellular carcinoma treatment.

Authors:  Davide Roccarina; Matteo Garcovich; Maria Elena Ainora; Laura Riccardi; Maurizio Pompili; Antonio Gasbarrini; Maria Assunta Zocco
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-07-18

9.  Quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  X-Q Pei; L-Z Liu; Y-H Xiong; R-H Zou; M-S Chen; A-H Li; M-Y Cai
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  How to perform Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS).

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Michalakis Averkiou; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Richard G Barr; Peter N Burns; Fabrizio Calliada; Vito Cantisani; Byung Choi; Maria C Chammas; Dirk-André Clevert; Michel Claudon; Jean-Michel Correas; Xin-Wu Cui; David Cosgrove; Mirko D'Onofrio; Yi Dong; JohnR Eisenbrey; Teresa Fontanilla; Odd Helge Gilja; Andre Ignee; Christian Jenssen; Yuko Kono; Masatoshi Kudo; Nathalie Lassau; Andrej Lyshchik; Maria Franca Meloni; Fuminori Moriyasu; Christian Nolsøe; Fabio Piscaglia; Maija Radzina; Adrian Saftoiu; Paul S Sidhu; Ioan Sporea; Dagmar Schreiber-Dietrich; Claude B Sirlin; Maria Stanczak; Hans-Peter Weskott; Stephanie R Wilson; Juergen Karl Willmann; Tae Kyoung Kim; Hyun-Jung Jang; Alexandar Vezeridis; Sue Westerway
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2018-02-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.