Literature DB >> 22969077

An anatomically customizable computational model relating the visual field to the optic nerve head in individual eyes.

Jonathan Denniss1, Allison M McKendrick, Andrew Turpin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present a computational model mapping visual field (VF) locations to optic nerve head (ONH) sectors accounting for individual ocular anatomy, and to describe the effects of anatomical variability on maps produced.
METHODS: A previous model that related retinal locations to ONH sectors was adapted to model eyes with varying axial length, ONH position and ONH dimensions. Maps (n = 11,550) relating VF locations (24-2 pattern, n = 52 non-blind-spot locations) to 1° ONH sectors were generated for a range of clinically plausible anatomical parameters. Infrequently mapped ONH sectors (5%) were discarded for all locations. The influence of anatomical variables on the maps was explored by multiple linear regression.
RESULTS: Across all anatomical variants, for individual VF locations (24-2), total number of mapped 1° ONH sectors ranged from 12 to 90. Forty-one locations varied more than 30°. In five nasal-step locations, mapped ONH sectors were bimodally distributed, mapping to vertically opposite ONH sectors depending on vertical ONH position. Mapped ONH sectors were significantly influenced (P < 0.0002) by axial length, ONH position, and ONH dimensions for 39, 52, and 30 VF locations, respectively. On average across all VF locations, vertical ONH position explained the most variance in mapped ONH sector, followed by horizontal ONH position, axial length, and ONH dimensions.
CONCLUSIONS: Relations between ONH sectors and many VF locations are strongly anatomy-dependent. Our model may be used to produce customized maps from VF locations to the ONH in individual eyes where some simple biometric parameters are known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22969077     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-9657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  20 in total

1.  [Flicker and conventional perimetry in comparison with structural changes in glaucoma].

Authors:  F Dannheim
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Reducing variability in visual field assessment for glaucoma through filtering that combines structural and functional information.

Authors:  Lisha Deng; Shaban Demirel; Stuart K Gardiner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Influence of the disc-fovea angle on limits of RNFL variability and glaucoma discrimination.

Authors:  Navid Amini; Sara Nowroozizadeh; Nila Cirineo; Sharon Henry; Ted Chang; Tom Chou; Anne L Coleman; Joseph Caprioli; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  Improving our understanding, and detection, of glaucomatous damage: An approach based upon optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Authors:  Donald C Hood
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 21.198

5.  Automatic identification of the temporal retinal nerve fiber raphe from macular cube data.

Authors:  Phillip Bedggood; Fumi Tanabe; Allison M McKendrick; Andrew Turpin
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Patterns of functional vision loss in glaucoma determined with archetypal analysis.

Authors:  Tobias Elze; Louis R Pasquale; Lucy Q Shen; Teresa C Chen; Janey L Wiggs; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Evaluation of a Method for Estimating Retinal Ganglion Cell Counts Using Visual Fields and Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Ali S Raza; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Policy-Driven, Multimodal Deep Learning for Predicting Visual Fields from the Optic Disc and OCT Imaging.

Authors:  Yuka Kihara; Giovanni Montesano; Andrew Chen; Nishani Amerasinghe; Chrysostomos Dimitriou; Aby Jacob; Almira Chabi; David P Crabb; Aaron Y Lee
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 14.277

9.  A Test of a Model of Glaucomatous Damage of the Macula With High-Density Perimetry: Implications for the Locations of Visual Field Test Points.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Matthew Nguyen; Alyssa C Ehrlich; Ali S Raza; Ieva Sliesoraityte; Carlos G De Moraes; Robert Ritch; Ulrich Schiefer
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Towards Patient-Tailored Perimetry: Automated Perimetry Can Be Improved by Seeding Procedures With Patient-Specific Structural Information.

Authors:  Jonathan Denniss; Allison M McKendrick; Andrew Turpin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.