PURPOSE: Regular physical activity (PA) can be used to improve cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). Previous research has shown differences in CRF (VO2max) among racial groups, but it is unclear how much of these differences can be explained by PA. Thus, we sought to examine the association between PA and CRF in different racial groups. METHODS: As a part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999–2004), 3115 adults (18–49 yr) completed a submaximal graded treadmill exercise test to estimate VO2max. Independent variables were demographics (race, education, sex, partner status, and waist circumference), behavioral measures (smoking and alcohol consumption), self-reported PA from three domains (leisure-time, domestic, and transportational PA (MET x min x wk(-1)), and the proportion of PA at a vigorous intensity (VMET). CRF was the dependent variable. Multiple linear regression was performed using SUDAAN statistical software. RESULTS: Results indicated that VO2max was significantly higher for Mexican Americans (40.9 T 0.5 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)) and non-Hispanic whites (40.2 +/- 0.3 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)) compared with non-Hispanic blacks (37.9 +/- 0.6 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)) (P = 0.01). Demographics including race explained 18.5% of the variance in VO2max, with race being significant (P < 0.01) in the model. When PA was added to the model, the explained variance in VO2max increased to 19.3% (P = 0.001). VMET was more predictive of VO2max than total PA, and the model including VMET explained 20.4% of the variance in VO2max. Race remained a significant, independent predictor of VO2max after VMET and overall PA were added to the model. CONCLUSION: Race, PA, and exercise intensity are important factors in explaining differences in CRF. After accounting for demographics, PA, and VMET, a large proportion of the variance in CRF remains unexplained. Thus, other factors should also be considered when examining racial/ethnic differences in CRF.
PURPOSE: Regular physical activity (PA) can be used to improve cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). Previous research has shown differences in CRF (VO2max) among racial groups, but it is unclear how much of these differences can be explained by PA. Thus, we sought to examine the association between PA and CRF in different racial groups. METHODS: As a part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999–2004), 3115 adults (18–49 yr) completed a submaximal graded treadmill exercise test to estimate VO2max. Independent variables were demographics (race, education, sex, partner status, and waist circumference), behavioral measures (smoking and alcohol consumption), self-reported PA from three domains (leisure-time, domestic, and transportational PA (MET x min x wk(-1)), and the proportion of PA at a vigorous intensity (VMET). CRF was the dependent variable. Multiple linear regression was performed using SUDAAN statistical software. RESULTS: Results indicated that VO2max was significantly higher for Mexican Americans (40.9 T 0.5 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)) and non-Hispanic whites (40.2 +/- 0.3 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)) compared with non-Hispanic blacks (37.9 +/- 0.6 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)) (P = 0.01). Demographics including race explained 18.5% of the variance in VO2max, with race being significant (P < 0.01) in the model. When PA was added to the model, the explained variance in VO2max increased to 19.3% (P = 0.001). VMET was more predictive of VO2max than total PA, and the model including VMET explained 20.4% of the variance in VO2max. Race remained a significant, independent predictor of VO2max after VMET and overall PA were added to the model. CONCLUSION: Race, PA, and exercise intensity are important factors in explaining differences in CRF. After accounting for demographics, PA, and VMET, a large proportion of the variance in CRF remains unexplained. Thus, other factors should also be considered when examining racial/ethnic differences in CRF.
Authors: Sophie Baumann; Diana Guertler; Franziska Weymar; Martin Bahls; Marcus Dörr; Neeltje van den Berg; Ulrich John; Sabina Ulbricht Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2019-06-12
Authors: Amanda E Staiano; Deirdre M Harrington; Neil M Johannsen; Robert L Newton; Mark A Sarzynski; Damon L Swift; Peter T Katzmarzyk Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2015 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Amanda E Paluch; Lindsay R Pool; Tamara Isakova; Cora E Lewis; Rupal Mehta; Pamela J Schreiner; Stephen Sidney; Myles Wolf; Mercedes R Carnethon Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jasper Most; L Anne Gilmore; Abby D Altazan; Marshall St Amant; Robbie A Beyl; Eric Ravussin; Leanne M Redman Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Damon L Swift; Amanda E Staiano; Neil M Johannsen; Carl J Lavie; Conrad P Earnest; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Steven N Blair; Robert L Newton; Timothy S Church Journal: Sports Med Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 11.136