Literature DB >> 22965989

Cerebral microembolization after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: comparison of warfarin plus aspirin versus aspirin only.

Talal Al-Atassi1, Khanh Lam, Melissa Forgie, Munir Boodhwani, Fraser Rubens, Paul Hendry, Roy Masters, William Goldstein, Pierre Bedard, Thierry Mesana, Marc Ruel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No human physiological data exists on whether aspirin only is as effective as warfarin plus aspirin in preventing cerebral microembolization in the early postoperative period after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (bAVR). METHODS AND
RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 56 patients who had no other indication for oral anticoagulation, who underwent bAVR and received, in an open-label fashion, either daily warfarin (for INR 2.0-3.0) plus 81 mg of aspirin (n=28) or 325 mg of aspirin only (n=28). Cerebral microembolization was quantified at 4 hours (baseline) and at 1 month postoperatively, by recording 1-hour bilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) microembolic signals (MES). Platelet-function analysis (PFA) of closure times (CT) on collagen was also used as a marker of platelet-dependent activation. Follow-up to 1 year was complete. Preoperative demographics and baseline platelet function were equivalent in both groups. There was no mortality, stroke, or transient ischemic attack at 1 year in either group. No significant differences were found in the proportion of patients with MES among those receiving warfarin plus aspirin versus aspirin only, at baseline (68% versus 82%, respectively; P=0.4) and at 1 month (46% versus 43%; P=1.0) after bAVR. The total MES and PFA were also equivalent between groups, at baseline and follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Early after bAVR, the effects of these 2 antithrombotic regimens on cerebral microembolization and platelet function are equivalent. These data bring new mechanistic support to the premise that aspirin only may safely be used early after bAVR in patients who have no other indication for oral anticoagulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22965989     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.084772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  5 in total

Review 1.  Safety and Use of Anticoagulation After Aortic Valve Replacement With Bioprostheses: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Haris Riaz; Shehab Ahmad Redha Alansari; Muhammad Shahzeb Khan; Talha Riaz; Sajjad Raza; Faraz Khan Luni; Abdur Rahman Khan; Irbaz Bin Riaz; Richard A Krasuski
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2016-05-10

2.  Design of a pulsatile flow facility to evaluate thrombogenic potential of implantable cardiac devices.

Authors:  Sivakkumar Arjunon; Pablo Hidalgo Ardana; Neelakantan Saikrishnan; Shalv Madhani; Brent Foster; Ari Glezer; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Follow-up and management of valvular heart disease patients with prosthetic valve: a clinical practice guideline for Indian scenario.

Authors:  Devendra Saksena; Yugal K Mishra; S Muralidharan; Vivek Kanhere; Pankaj Srivastava; C P Srivastava
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-01-28

4.  Antithrombotic Strategies After Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Joel N Papak; Joseph C Chiovaro; North Noelck; Laura D Healy; Michele Freeman; Jacquelyn A Quin; Robin Paynter; Allison Low; Karli Kondo; Owen J T McCarty; Devan Kansagara
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  The Effect of Aspirin on Bleeding and Transfusion in Contemporary Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Jordan E Goldhammer; Gregary D Marhefka; Constantine Daskalakis; Mark W Berguson; John E Bowen; James T Diehl; Jianzhong Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.