Literature DB >> 22965975

Cost-effectiveness analysis for surgical, angioplasty, or medical therapeutics for coronary artery disease: 5-year follow-up of medicine, angioplasty, or surgery study (MASS) II trial.

Ricardo D'Oliveira Vieira1, Whady Hueb, Mark Hlatky, Desiderio Favarato, Paulo Cury Rezende, Cibele Larrosa Garzillo, Eduardo Gomes Lima, Paulo Rogério Soares, Alexandre Ciappina Hueb, Alexandre Costa Pereira, José Antonio Franchini Ramires, Roberto Kalil Filho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Second Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II) included patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and normal systolic ventricular function. Patients underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG, n=203), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, n=205), or medical treatment alone (MT, n=203). This investigation compares the economic outcome at 5-year follow-up of the 3 therapeutic strategies. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We analyzed cumulative costs during a 5-year follow-up period. To analyze the cost-effectiveness, adjustment was made on the cumulative costs for average event-free time and angina-free proportion. Respectively, for event-free survival and event plus angina-free survival, MT presented 3.79 quality-adjusted life-years and 2.07 quality-adjusted life-years; PCI presented 3.59 and 2.77 quality-adjusted life-years; and CABG demonstrated 4.4 and 2.81 quality-adjusted life-years. The event-free costs were $9071.00 for MT; $19,967.00 for PCI; and $18,263.00 for CABG. The paired comparison of the event-free costs showed that there was a significant difference favoring MT versus PCI (P<0.01) and versus CABG (P<0.01) and CABG versus PCI (P=0.01). The event-free plus angina-free costs were $16,553.00, $25,831.00, and $24,614.00, respectively. The paired comparison of the event-free plus angina-free costs showed that there was a significant difference favoring MT versus PCI (P=0.04), and versus CABG (P<0.001); there was no difference between CABG and PCI (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In the long-term economic analysis, for the prevention of a composite primary end point, MT was more cost effective than CABG, and CABG was more cost-effective than PCI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: www.controlled-trials.com. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN66068876.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22965975     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.084442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  11 in total

Review 1.  Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention: a review.

Authors:  Matthew R Summers; Manesh R Patel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention compared to medical therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Saeed Sheikh Gholami; Farbod Ebadi Fard Azar; Aziz Rezapour; Masih Tajdini
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 3.  Stakeholders in outcome measures: review from a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Mark R Brinker; Daniel P O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Rediscovering Brazil: How We Prevent and Treat Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Letícia Rodrigues Costa; Eduardo Vasconcelos Passos; Odilson Marcos Silvestre
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Cost-effectiveness of zofenopril in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction: a post hoc analysis of SMILE-4.

Authors:  Claudio Borghi; Ettore Ambrosioni; Stefano Omboni; Arrigo Fg Cicero; Stefano Bacchelli; Daniela Degli Esposti; Salvatore Novo; Dragos Vinereanu; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Giorgio Reggiardo; Dario Zava
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-07-08

6.  Stratification of coronary artery disease patients for revascularization procedure based on estimating adverse effects.

Authors:  Sebastian Pölsterl; Maneesh Singh; Amin Katouzian; Nassir Navab; Adnan Kastrati; Lance Ladic; Ali Kamen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 7.  Comparative cost-effectiveness of surgery, angioplasty, or medical therapy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: MASS II trial.

Authors:  Sara Michelly Gonçalves Brandão; Paulo Cury Rezende; Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Yang Ting Ju; Antonio Carlos Pedroso de Lima; Myrthes Emy Takiuti; Whady Hueb; Edimar Alcides Bocchi
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2018-11-03

8.  A systematic review and critical analysis of cost-effectiveness studies for coronary artery disease treatment.

Authors:  Victoria McCreanor; Nicholas Graves; Adrian G Barnett; Will Parsonage; Gregory Merlo
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-01-17

9.  Personalised eHealth intervention to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in rehabilitation after cardiac operations: study protocol for the PACO randomised controlled trial (NCT03470246).

Authors:  Ville Vasankari; Jari Halonen; Pauliina Husu; Henri Vähä-Ypyä; Kari Tokola; Jaana Suni; Harri Sievänen; Vesa Anttila; Juhani Airaksinen; Tommi Vasankari; Juha Hartikainen
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2019-07-05

10.  Economic Analysis of Surgical and Interventional Treatments for Patients with Complex Coronary Artery Disease: Insights from a One-Year Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Yang Zhao; Shuai Meng; Taoshuai Liu; Ran Dong
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-02-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.