Literature DB >> 22964058

Individual differences in the rubber-hand illusion: predicting self-reports of people's personal experiences.

Antal Haans1, Florian G Kaiser, Don G Bouwhuis, Wijnand A Ijsselsteijn.   

Abstract

Can we assess individual differences in the extent to which a person perceives the rubber-hand illusion on the basis of self-reported experiences? In this research, we develop such an instrument using Rasch-type models. In our conception, incorporating an object (e.g., a rubber hand) into one's body image requires various sensorimotor and cognitive processes. The extent to which people can meet these requirements thus determines how intensely people experience and, simultaneously, describe the illusion. As a consequence, individual differences in people's susceptibility to the rubber-hand illusion can be determined by inspecting reports of their personal experiences. The proposed model turned out to be functional in its capability to predict self-reports of people's experiences and to reliably assess individual differences in susceptibility to the illusion. Regarding validity, we found a small, but significant, correlation between individual susceptibility and proprioceptive drift. Additionally, we found that asynchrony, and tapping rather than stroking the fingers constrain the experience of the illusion.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22964058     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  22 in total

1.  Multisensory integration and age-dependent sensitivity to body representation modification induced by the rubber hand illusion.

Authors:  János Kállai; Péter Kincses; Beatrix Lábadi; Krisztina Dorn; Tibor Szolcsányi; Gergely Darnai; Ernő Hupuczi; József Janszky; Árpád Csathó
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-08-05

2.  Multisensory Integration Dominates Hypnotisability and Expectations in the Rubber Hand Illusion.

Authors:  Mel Slater; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.473

3.  Susceptibility to the rubber hand illusion does not tell the whole body-awareness story.

Authors:  Nicole David; Francesca Fiori; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.526

4.  Bodily self and immune self: is there a link?

Authors:  Marcello Costantini
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Rubber hand illusion induced by touching the face ipsilaterally to a deprived hand: evidence for plastic "somatotopic" remapping in tetraplegics.

Authors:  Michele Scandola; Emmanuele Tidoni; Renato Avesani; Giovanni Brunelli; Salvatore M Aglioti; Valentina Moro
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  The development of the ProMAS: a Probabilistic Medication Adherence Scale.

Authors:  Mieke Kleppe; Joyca Lacroix; Jaap Ham; Cees Midden
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Individual Differences in the Rubber Hand Illusion Are Related to Sensory Suggestibility.

Authors:  Angela Marotta; Michele Tinazzi; Clelia Cavedini; Massimiliano Zampini; Mirta Fiorio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Timing disownership experiences in the rubber hand illusion.

Authors:  Timothy Lane; Su-Ling Yeh; Philip Tseng; An-Yi Chang
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-01-30

9.  Why and how to use virtual reality to study human social interaction: The challenges of exploring a new research landscape.

Authors:  Xueni Pan; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2018-03-05

10.  Tactile Gap Detection Deteriorates during Bimanual Symmetrical Movements under Mirror Visual Feedback.

Authors:  Janet H Bultitude; Georgiana Juravle; Charles Spence
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.