BACKGROUND: Exonic variants of unknown biological significance (VUS) identified in patients can affect mRNA splicing, either by changing 5' or 3' splice sites or by modifying splicing regulatory elements. Bioinformatic predictions of these elements are still inaccurate and only few such elements have been functionally mapped in BRCA2. We studied the effect on splicing of eight exon 7 VUS, selected from the French UMD-BRCA2 mutation database. METHODS: We performed splicing minigene assays and analyses of patient RNA. We also developed a pyrosequencing-based quantitative assay, to measure, in patient RNA, the relative contribution of each allele to the production of exon 7-containing transcripts. Moreover, an exonic splicing enhancer (ESE)-dependent minigene assay was used to evaluate the splicing regulatory properties of wild-type and mutant segments. RESULTS: Six out of the eight variants induced splicing defects. In the minigene assay, c.517G>T and c.631G>A altered the natural splice sites, c.572A>G created a new 5' splice site, and c.520C>T, c.587G>A and c.617C>G induced exon 7 skipping (66%, 25% and 46%, respectively). Pyrosequencing of patient RNA confirmed these levels of exon skipping for c.520C>T and c.617C>G. Results from the ESE-dependent minigene assay indicated that c.520C>T and c.587G>A disturb splicing regulatory elements. CONCLUSIONS: BRCA2 exon 7 splicing is regulated by multiple exonic elements and is sensitive to disease-associated sequence variations. Measurements of allelic imbalance in patient-derived RNA and/or quantitative analyses using minigene assays provide valuable estimates of the extent of partial splicing defects. Assessment of pathogenicity of variants with partial splicing effect awaits additional evidence and especially the completion of segregation analyses.
BACKGROUND: Exonic variants of unknown biological significance (VUS) identified in patients can affect mRNA splicing, either by changing 5' or 3' splice sites or by modifying splicing regulatory elements. Bioinformatic predictions of these elements are still inaccurate and only few such elements have been functionally mapped in BRCA2. We studied the effect on splicing of eight exon 7 VUS, selected from the French UMD-BRCA2 mutation database. METHODS: We performed splicing minigene assays and analyses of patient RNA. We also developed a pyrosequencing-based quantitative assay, to measure, in patient RNA, the relative contribution of each allele to the production of exon 7-containing transcripts. Moreover, an exonic splicing enhancer (ESE)-dependent minigene assay was used to evaluate the splicing regulatory properties of wild-type and mutant segments. RESULTS: Six out of the eight variants induced splicing defects. In the minigene assay, c.517G>T and c.631G>A altered the natural splice sites, c.572A>G created a new 5' splice site, and c.520C>T, c.587G>A and c.617C>G induced exon 7 skipping (66%, 25% and 46%, respectively). Pyrosequencing of patient RNA confirmed these levels of exon skipping for c.520C>T and c.617C>G. Results from the ESE-dependent minigene assay indicated that c.520C>T and c.587G>A disturb splicing regulatory elements. CONCLUSIONS:BRCA2 exon 7 splicing is regulated by multiple exonic elements and is sensitive to disease-associated sequence variations. Measurements of allelic imbalance in patient-derived RNA and/or quantitative analyses using minigene assays provide valuable estimates of the extent of partial splicing defects. Assessment of pathogenicity of variants with partial splicing effect awaits additional evidence and especially the completion of segregation analyses.
Authors: Silvia Casadei; Suleyman Gulsuner; Brian H Shirts; Jessica B Mandell; Hannah M Kortbawi; Barbara S Norquist; Elizabeth M Swisher; Ming K Lee; Yael Goldberg; Robert O'Connor; Zheng Tan; Colin C Pritchard; Mary-Claire King; Tom Walsh Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: L Grodecká; T Kováčová; M Kramárek; S Seneca; K Stouffs; C De Laet; F Majer; T Kršjaková; P Hujová; K Hrnčířová; P Souček; W Lissens; E Buratti; Tomas Freiberger Journal: J Mol Med (Berl) Date: 2016-11-12 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Gina Ravenscroft; Joshua S Clayton; Fathimath Faiz; Padma Sivadorai; Di Milnes; Rob Cincotta; Phillip Moon; Ben Kamien; Matthew Edwards; Martin Delatycki; Phillipa J Lamont; Sophelia Hs Chan; Alison Colley; Alan Ma; Felicity Collins; Lucinda Hennington; Teresa Zhao; George McGillivray; Sondhya Ghedia; Katherine Chao; Anne O'Donnell-Luria; Nigel G Laing; Mark R Davis Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Phillip J Whiley; Michael T Parsons; Jennifer Leary; Kathy Tucker; Linda Warwick; Belinda Dopita; Heather Thorne; Sunil R Lakhani; David E Goldgar; Melissa A Brown; Amanda B Spurdle Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mara Colombo; Giovanna De Vecchi; Laura Caleca; Claudia Foglia; Carla B Ripamonti; Filomena Ficarazzi; Monica Barile; Liliana Varesco; Bernard Peissel; Siranoush Manoukian; Paolo Radice Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: A Joseph Bloom; Maribel Martinez; Li-Shiun Chen; Laura J Bierut; Sharon E Murphy; Alison Goate Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-15 Impact factor: 3.240