Literature DB >> 22962602

Soil fertilization leads to a decline in between-samples variability of microbial community δ13C profiles in a grassland fertilization experiment.

Stavros D Veresoglou1, Barry Thornton, George Menexes, Andreas P Mamolos, Demetrios S Veresoglou.   

Abstract

Gas chromatography combustion isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-C-IRMS) was used to measure the (13)C/(12)C ratios of PLFAs at natural abundance levels from a temperate grassland nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) factorial fertilization experiment in northern Greece. In each plot two rhizosphere samples were derived centred around individual Agrostis capillaris and Prunella vulgaris plants. It was hypothesized that the isotopic signal of microbes that preferentially feed on recalcitrant litter such as fungi would be modified by fertilization more strongly than that of opportunistic microbes using labile C. Microbial community δ(13)C was affected by both P and N fertilization regime and plant species identity. However, we have been unable to detect significant nutrient effects on individual groups of microbes when analyzed separately in contrast to our original hypothesis. Intra-treatment variability, as evaluated from Hartley's F(max) tests in the five first PCA components axes as well as the size of the convex hulls in PCA scoreplots and Mahalanobis distances, was considerably higher in the non-fertilized controls. Moreover, a significant relationship was established between the change in PLFA abundances and their respective changes in δ(13)C for the aggregate of samples and those simultaneously fertilized with N and P. We conclude that use of compound specific isotope analysis in the absence of labelling represents a valuable and overlooked tool in obtaining an insight of microbial community functioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22962602      PMCID: PMC3433468          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Carbon (C) isotopes represent a diagnostic tool for soil ecosystem functioning [1]. Carbon occurs in nature in the form of three isotopes, 12C, 13C, 14C at abundances 98.89%, 1.1% and 0.01% respectively [2]. In isotope studies at natural abundance levels the 13C content of a sample is usually measured through the δ13C value defined as: δ13C (‰) = 1000×(Rsample – Rstandard)/Rstandard‰, where Rsample and Rstandard are the 13C/12C abundance ratios of the sample and a reference standard (Vienna-Pee Dee Belemnite) [3]. Compound specific, including phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA), isotope analysis through gas chromatography combustion isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-C-IRMS) can provide information of carbon pathways at the molecular scale [4]. The vast majority of soil microbes are heterotrophes and rely on C assimilation to meet their energy needs. Carbon limitation of microbial growth, that is commonly reported in the soil environment [5], results in most microbes aggregating in carbon “hot-spots” such as the rhizosphere [6]. However, assimilation speed of carbon by the microbial community may vary considerably for different carbon compounds [7]. Moreover, for some carbon compounds the range of potential degraders appears to be narrower than others. For example lignin is mainly degraded by white rot fungi; whilst glycine may be assimilated by a narrower range of microbial groups than other exudates [8], [9]. In the short term organic residues in soil exhibit a δ13C fractioning as more recalcitrant litter compounds such as waxes and lignin are known to be more depleted (possess more negative δ13C) in 13C [10], [11], [12]. Wedin et al. [13] were able to demonstrate, in an incubation study, that the proportion of lignin fraction of grass litter in organic matter increased with time and that it was consistently more depleted in 13C than the “bulk” of organic matter. However, in contrast to their original hypothesis, the overall isotopic signature of organic matter, δ13C, did not change towards that of lignin. This is in agreement with an increasing amount of literature that has shown an increase in 13C content (more positive δ13C signal) of soil organic matter when organic matter ages [11], [14]. It is now believed that in the longer term, decomposability of soil compounds is determined by accessibility of the substrate to the microbial community and the rate of decomposition is determined by abiotic factors [15], [16]. Selective use of C compounds from microbial groups, along with kinetic fractionation, the isotopic discrimination for carbon during microbial consumption [17], are perceived to be the two mechanisms that shape the isotopic composition of microbially respired CO2 that may differ considerably from that of the organic matter [18]. Thereby, isotopic δ13C signal of bulk tissue of microbial groups, that is believed to be depleted at a scale of 0.7–2.8‰ relative to respired CO2 [19], may reflect that of the compounds been assimilated. Microbes that feed on older more recalcitrant litter could, consequently, be expected to possess less depleted isotopic δ13C bulk tissue. Phospholipids, although further depleted in 13C relative to bulk tissue at a scale of 6–8‰ [20], because of the rapid post-death degradation in the soil environment [21] may represent an ideal target to study microbial group δ13C signals. GC-C-IRMS analysis of soil samples has, mainly, been applied following 13C feeding of the microbial community [22], 13CO2 labelling of plants [23] or a shift from C4 to C3 vegetation [24]. While the specific approach has the potential to provide invaluable information on the microbial groups that utilize the labelled compounds, it may be of more limited applicability in long term studies because spiked δ13C signal fade with time and high noise can result from natural variability in δ13C of microbial cell membranes. An alternative way to conduct analysis of long-term dynamics of litter could be through GC-C-IRMS analysis of PLFAs at natural abundance levels. A challenge in this case remains the interpretation of natural isotopic signals of individual signatures. To date, natural abundance GC-C-IRMS analysis of PLFAs in soil ecology has been very restricted; the few studies which have adopted this specific approach have made limited attempts to draw inferences out of them [25], [26]. By contrast, natural abundance GC-C-IRMS is routinely applied in marine studies [27]. It is well established that fertilization of soil may evoke considerable shifts with regards to terrestrial C cycling. The traditional view that fertilization may increase decomposition rates [28] has been challenged by Berg and Meentemeyer [29] who argued that at higher N levels (low C:N ratio) more litter remains at the stage when decomposition virtually ceases. Inpan> agreement with this view, the microbial N mining hypothesis [30] states that following N addition, rates of decomposition decline as microbes use the readily available N that is applied through fertilization instead of decomposing organic compounds, a hypothesis supported by results from Craine et al. [31]. By contrast, Galantini and Rossell [32] were able to demonstrate that N and phosphorus (P) long term fertilization resulted in an increase of the ratio of labile to recalcitrant organic fractions. While a considerable amount of literature has addressed the impact of fertilization practices in the short-term [33], [34], there is increasing awareness that ecosystem feedback to pulsed nutrient addition on the longer term may differ [35], [36], [37]. The effects of fertilization on C-cycling are of high ecological relevance as they could implicate with the C sequestration ability of soils. Post industrial increase in N deposition had been predicted, through increased primary productivity, to result in increases in C sequestration [38] but empirical results often reveal that more complicated mechanisms may operate [39]. We launched a study of exploratory nature on the potential use of natural abundance GC-C-IRMS as a tool to get an insight of microbial community responses to medium-term (i.e 3–10 years) fertilization in a C3 grassland in northern Greece. Absence of C4 plants, which produce plant litter with distinct δ13C signal, restricted 13C variability in plant litter and exudates and enabled us to attribute δ13C signal of individual microbial groups mainly to isotopic discrimination during photosynthesis, litter decomposition, fractionation and discrimination during C assimilation. We anticipated that despite the natural gradient of δ13C that occurs amongst C compounds, the δ13C isotope signal would reflect the persistence time in the soil and that the recalcitrant fraction of soil organic matter (older in age) would be characterized by less depleted 13C. We, thus, expected that microbial group δ13C largely reflected the isotopic signal of the compounds consumed. We primarily wanted to assess the extent of differences in the natural abundance δ13C signal of individual microbial groups as affected by the fertilization practices. As stated earlier, fertilization results in longer residence time for the recalcitrant fraction of litter [29], [30], [31], a litter fraction with a δ13C signal dependent on decomposition history [11], [14]. We hypothesized that the isotopic signal of microbial groups that specialize on the assimilation of recalcitrant litter such as fungi would have been affected more strongly than the respective δ13C of more opportunistic microbial groups such as bacteria that use labile C. We further hypothesized that the microbial groups that would have gained access, following fertilization, to less recalcitrant litter would have increased in relative abundance whereas those that utilised less readily available compounds would have declined. This could be reflected in a linear relationship between change in δ13C13C - a capital Δ is used for δ13C differences as opposed to isotopic signal where the use of a small δ has been adopted) of individual PLFA signatures (since recalcitrant compounds may be expected to be less depleted in δ13C) and relative change in PLFA signature abundance. Further to the ecological significance (to the best of our knowledge the specific question has not been addressed in the past) of recovering a negative relationship between the two variables tested this would additionally confirm the sensitivity of the GC-C-IRMS approach adopted in the manuscript in the absence of labelling as a means of studying the physiology of the microbial community in soils.

Results

Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests did not detect violations of normality in PLFA δ13C signals at a scale that would prohibit PCA. Normality of the microbial group datasets that were used for analysis of variance was also confirmed. The analysis of variance did not reveal significant effects of either the two manipulations (N and P fertilization) or the plant species (rhizosphere) effect in the microbial groups examined with the exception of fungi where a significant plant species effect was detected (F 1,28 = 10.52, P = 0.003– after Bonferroni P = 0.021) (Fig. 1). However, a trend of P fertilization practice resulting in an increase of δ13C value of gram negative bacteria existed (F 1,28 = 5.996, P = 0.02– after Bonferroni P = 0.14) as well as a trend for an interactive effect of species and P fertilisation on AM fungal δ13C value (F 1,28 = 6.532, P = 0.016– after Bonferroni P = 0.11). The broken stick model revealed significance of the five first PCs that explained a cumulative 72.36% of total variance. PCA distance scoreplots revealed overlap of the imposed treatments (Fig. 2). According to MANOVA analysis, however, the effects of P (P = 0.001– significant for the 1st, 3rd and 5th principal components) N (P = 0.011– significant for the 2nd component) and plant (P = 0.001– significant for the 5th principal component) manipulations on δ13C values were rendered significant as well as the interactive effect of plant and P (P = 0.04– the effect was not significant for any individual component considered) (Table 1).
Figure 1

Isotopic signal of key microbial groups.

δ13C value (±S.E.) of main microbial groups in the fertilization experiment as affected by N and P fertilization practices and plant species identity. The only significant effect was that of plant species on fungi. The two dotted lines have been drawn for reference purposes for δ13C signals equal to −30 and −35, respectively. Abbreviations stand for: C-control +N-N fertilized samples +P-P fertilized samples +NP = NP fertilized samples, Ac-Agrostis capillaris, Pv-Prunella vulgaris.

Figure 2

Ordination diagrams of the isotopic signal of PLFA signatures.

Principal component analysis distance scoreplots and respective convex hulls of PCA scores grouped according to N and P fertilization regime. In all plots the x axis illustrates PCA scores of the first component whereas the y axis illustrates PCA scores of the (a) second; (b) third; (c) fourth and (d) fifth component, respectively. The five axes explained a cumulative 72.36% of variance. Abbreviations stand for: C-control +N-N fertilized samples +P-P fertilized samples +NP = NP fertilized samples.

Table 1

Pillai’s Trace statistics following a MANOVA analysis of microbial community δ13C PCA scores.

EffectPillai’s Trace F P PCs
Block0.9061.5800.071
Plant0.5385.585 0.001 5
N0.4443.840 0.011 2
P0.5646.214 0.001 1,3,5
Plant * N0.2931.9880.117
Plant * P0.3652.760 0.042
N * P0.3172.2320.084
Plant * N * P0.1991.1940.342

The broken stick model retrieved five significant PCA components. The column PCs highlights the principal components where significance of the factor has been detected.

Isotopic signal of key microbial groups.

δn class="Chemical">13C value (±S.E.) of main microbial groups in the fertilization experiment as affected by N and P fertilization practices and plant species identity. The only significant effect was that of plant species on fungi. The two dotted lines have been drawn for reference purposes for δn class="Chemical">13C signals equal to −30 and −35, respectively. Abbreviations stand for: C-control +N-N fertilized samples +P-P fertilized samples +NP = NP fertilized samples, Ac-Agrostis capillaris, Pv-Prunella vulgaris. The broken stick model retrieved five significant PCA components. The column PCs highlights the principal components where significance of the factor has been detected.

Ordination diagrams of the isotopic signal of PLFA signatures.

Principal component analysis distance scoreplots and respective convex hulls of PCA scores grouped according to N and P fertilization regime. In all plots the x axis illustrates PCA scores of the first component whereas the y axis illustrates PCA scores of the (a) second; (b) third; (c) fourth and (d) fifth component, respectively. The five axes explained a cumulative 72.36% of variance. Abbreviations stand for: C-control +N-N fertilized samples +P-P fertilized samples +NP = NP fertilized samples. We, subsequently, tested violation of the homogeneity of variance criterion in the PCA scores grouped according to N and P manipulations. For all five principal components the F max test was significant (P<0.05, Table 2). Non-fertilized samples consistently were those where the highest variability with respect to PLFA δ13C signal was recorded. Convex hulls that were obtained from combination of the five first principal components verified that non-fertilized samples exhibit the highest variability with respect to δ13C signals (Table 3). Finally Mahalanobis distances of individual samples are presented in Table S1. The Kruskal-Wallis test, that explored the impact of the four fertilization treatments on the ranking of the Mahalanobis distances, was significant (P = 0.039). We therefore concluded that a significantly higher variance existed in unfertilized plots.
Table 2

Variances of scores in the five first PCA component axes of the PCA grouped according to fertilization manipulation and results of the Hartley F max test for homogeneity of variances.

Variance controlVariance N-fertilizedVariance P-fertilizedVariance NP-fertilized F valuea P a
PCA Comp. 10.460.200.080.125.930.007
PCA Comp. 20.180.050.030.045.830.007
PCA Comp. 30.150.070.070.026.330.006
PCA Comp. 40.090.040.060.023.560.036
PCA Comp. 50.100.040.040.033.690.033

Values obtained from an F max comparison between the non fertilized control and the less variable fertilization treatment.

Table 3

Convex hull sizes of samples grouped according to fertilization regime.

PCA ComponentsConvex hull size controlConvex hull size N-fertilizedConvex hull size P-fertilizedConvex hull size NP-fertilized
1,21.950.470.230.35
1,31.620.760.410.32
1,41.210.470.380.32
1,51.060.510.370.33
2,30.800.340.210.18
2,40.720.300.270.19
2,50.690.260.190.22
3,40.700.310.400.09
3,50.710.260.340.14
4,50.540.270.280.14
Values obtained from an F max comparison between the non fertilized control and the less variable fertilization treatment. Correlation of the weighted difference in concentration with the respective non-fertilized control and ΔC signalling was significant for the NP treatment (n = 42, Spearman ρ = −0.477, P<0.01) as well as for the entire dataset (n = 126, Spearman ρ = −0.177, P<0.05) (Fig. 3).
Figure 3

Modification of PLFA abundance vs isotopic signal diagram.

Scatter plot of the relationship between percent change of individual PLFA concentrations and Δ13C in the fertilized treatments compared to the non-fertilized controls. Open circles: N fertilized samples, triangles: P fertilized and squares: NP fertilized samples. The thin continuous line is the best fit least-squares line for the NP fertilized samples. The thick continuous line is the least-squares trendline for all three fertilization treatments when compared to the control. Note, non-significant trendlines for N and P fertilized samples were not drawn.

Modification of PLFA abundance vs isotopic signal diagram.

Scatter plot of the relationship between percent change of individual PLFA concentrations and Δ13C in the fertilized treatments compared to the non-fertilized controls. Open circles: N fertilized samples, triangles: P fertilized and squares: NP fertilized samples. The thin continuous line is the best fit least-squares line for the NP fertilized samples. The thick continuous line is the least-squares trendline for all three fertilization treatments when compared to the control. Note, non-significant trendlines for N and P fertilized samples were not drawn.

Discussion

In C3 grasslands a major source of fractionation of the plant community in δ13C is the water use efficiency. Isotopic discrimination of 13C greater than 22‰ may result during photosynthesis in C3 plants [40], [41]. Whilst the majority of this is resultant from metabolic discrimination, it is also in part due to stomatal aperture changes. However, in the long term plants show an intermediate 13C fractioning response towards the typical moisture regime of their environment. The upland grassland where the experiment was located was typical Mediterranean semi-arid grassland where thaw of ice in April and drought during summer months result in a short plant growing season. Preliminary experimentation had revealed heterogeneity in water availability between different blocks (Fig. S1) and this could have accounted for the absence of detectable Euclidean space differences in δ13C amongst fertilization treatments. On the other hand, persistence of this short growth season signified that temporal complementarity in plant growth was maintained to a minimum [42] and that this could constrain across-years variability with regards to plant litter δ13C signal. Ehleringer et al. [11] and Bowling et al. [14] were able to detect a difference in δ13C between litter and bulk organic matter deep in soil of approximately 2‰. Fertilization effects may have consequently fallen short of the natural soil C recalcitrance variation on δ13C. MANOVA analysis revealed that P and N fertilization regimes and plant species identity had a significant effect on microbial δ13C values (Fig. 2). N fertilization, through altering the water use efficiency (either positively or negatively) of plant species, has been repetitively demonstrated to be a key regulator of δ13C signal of the plant community and, consequently, plant litter [43]. In Hobbie and Colpaert [43] N additions through deteriorating water use efficiency resulted in plants grown in N-fertilized plots possessing 1–1.5‰ less depleted (more positive) δ13C. The relatively low significance of N fertilization practice on PLFA δ13C was, thus, a surprising outcome of the analysis. However, in the specific sampling area P fertilization had a more pronounced impact than N in shaping microbial community clustering patterns [44]. Because of the exploratory nature of the study a conservative approach in interpreting data was adopted. Hence, the influence of different treatments was evaluated following a classical Bonferroni correction. In an earlier analysis of PLFA concentrations [44] no significant responses of the main microbial groups, as a direct effect of either fertilization or plant species identity, was observed. Therefore differences in δ13C could not be attributed to microbial community shifts and comparisons were facilitated. The specific approach revealed that the only microbial group whose δ13C was significantly (P<0.05) affected by manipulations were fungi (AM fungi were separately analyzed and excluded from the fungal group as they assimilate plant derived labile carbon and, thus, exhibit a distinct δ13C signal – no ectomycorrhizal plants were present in the grassland – Fig. 1). In specific, P. vulgaris appeared to support a fungal population with more depleted 13C phospholipids than A. capillaris did. Soil fungi are a heterogeneous group of decomposers some of which (e.g. white rot fungi) exhibit high specificity on the carbon compounds they consume. Therefore, significance of the plant identity effect could reflect qualitative differences in litter quality produced that could have altered the relative composition within the fungal group. Alternatively, fungal PLFA signatures have been demonstrated to more readily respond to 13CO2 labelling which signifies dependence on newly released photoassimilates [45]. Differences in exudation patterns and/or extent of mycorrhizal colonization between the two plants could justify the recorded differences in fungal phospholipid content in 13C. Lower inter-sample variance in δ13C of microbial groups was recorded in the fertilized plots. The authors attribute this to microbes having narrowed the range of carbon compounds they assimilated. The N mining hypothesis predicts a decline in the degrading efficiency of the recalcitrant fraction of plant litter following N fertilization. Similarly, evidence suggests that the increase in microbial activity that is known to follow a fertilization event is transient and in the longer term microbial biomass declines [37]. The decline is more intense for fungi that are responsible for degrading the recalcitrant fraction litter [37], [46]. Apparently, following chronic fertilization, the microbial community targets labile C and this makes microbial nutrition more predictable and constrains inter-sample variation in δ13C. With regards to the hypothesis that the microbial groups that increased in abundance following fertilization would have utilised less recalcitrant pools of carbon and would be characterized by a decline in δ13C (although in Veresoglou et al. [44] the differences that had been detected were not significant) we were able to notice a linear relationship in agreement to the proposed hypothesis. The PLFA signatures that increased in abundance had actually been able to feed in more depleted in 13C litter. As stated in the introduction the specific study represents one of the very few attempts to utilize GC-C-IRMS in the absence of 13C labelling in studies addressing soil microbial communities. The authors were able to use this data to report inferences on the inter-sample variability of δ13C microbial profiles and the linear relationship between relative shifts in individual signature concentration and Δ13C of signal. The main advantage of the approach has been the fact that it is fast to conduct and does not require the extensive optimization procedure that accompanies a 13C labelling experiment. By contrast, the main drawback of the method may be its limited discrimination power as a maximum isotopic difference of 4‰ was recorded between microbial groups in the case between fungi and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Such a small discrimination power may lead to a masking of significant effects because of “noise” generated by environmental and analytical variability and further complicate interpretation of data. Additionally, we had to confront the lack of background literature to compare our results to but the specific issue could be resolved following an increase in the number of studies in the near future that utilize this specific approach. In conclusion, GC-C-IRMS in the absence of 13C labelling may represent an interesting tool in evaluating responses of microbial groups to environmental manipulations. The technique suffers from low discrimination power due to low natural fractioning of C compounds but may provide a vehicle to address issues such as natural variability in isotopic composition of microbes between samples and overall patterns of PLFA concentration and Δ13C responses to environmental factors.

Materials and Methods

Field Site and Experimental Design

The experimental area was located at a high elevation site 160 km west of Thessaloniki in Northern Greece (40o48′ N; 21o23′ E; 1,340 m a.s.l.) in a mesotrophic grassland with a plant community that resembles the MG5 plant community Cynosurus cristatus-Centaurea nigra grassland with a Galium verum sub-community [47]. Starting in spring 2004, two levels of N (0 and 15 g N m−2 year−1 applied as NH4NO3) and two levels of P (0 and 10 g m−2 year−1 applied as superphosphate) were applied annually on experimental plots (1.5×1.5 m) resulting in the formation of a factorial N and P fertilization experiment with eight blocks. Some details of the experimental site and analytical procedures have been described in Veresoglou et al. [44]; this previous manuscript described the microbial community shifts that resulted from fertilization practices. No specific permits were required for the described field study. The location was not privately-owned and was not designated as a protected area. Under Greek law no further permission was required to sample the area for scientific purposes. No endangered or protected species were involved in the field sampling.

Soil Sampling and Analysis

On the 10th of July 2008 a harvest was carried out on the abovementioned site. Five blocks were randomly selected and in each of the twenty plots (5 blocks × 4 treatments) two soil cores (2 cm internal diameter, 8 cm depth) were retrieved, one centered on an Agrostis capillaris stand and one around a Prunella vulgaris individual. The cores were immediately frozen in liquid N2 and were subsequently freeze-dried, then following removal of visible plant material were ball milled for PLFA extraction. PLFA extraction was implemented according to White et al., [48] and analysis followed in a compound specific gas chromatograph-isotope ratio mass spectrometer GC-C-IRMS (GC Trace Ultra with combustion column attached via a GC Combustion III to a Delta V Advantage isotope ratio mass spectrometer Thermo Finnigan, Bremen, Germany). Samples (2 µl) were injected in splitless mode onto a J&W Scientific HP-5 column, 50 m length, id 0.2 mm with a film thickness of 0.33 µm (Agilent Technologies Inc, Santa Clara, USA); otherwise running conditions were as described by Paterson et al. [9]. The C isotope ratios were calculated with respect to a CO2 reference gas injected with every sample and traceable to International Atomic Energy Agency reference material NBS 19 TS-Limestone. Repeated analysis, over a two month period, of the δ13C value of a 19:0 FAME internal standard gave a standard deviation of 1.11 ‰ (n = 18).

Data Analysis

Standard nomenclature was used for PLFAs [49] as follows: the number before the colon indicates the number of carbon atoms in the phospholipids and the number after the colon gives the number of double bonds and their location (ω). Prefixes Me, cy, i and a indicate presence of methyl- and cyclopropyl- groups and iso- or antesio- branching, respectively. The PLFA signatures 16:1ω7, 17:0cy, 19:0cy, 19:1w6, 15:0i, 15:0a, 16:0i, 17:0i, 17:0a 10-Me-17:0, 10-Me-18:0 were attributed to bacteria [23]. The fatty acid 18:2ω6,9 was used as a marker for fungi other than arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi [50] and the signatures 10-Me-17:0 and 10-Me-18:0 as markers for actinomycetes [51]. Signature 16:1ω5c was used as a biomarker of AM fungi [52]. Data were subjected to Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests for normality prior to analyses. To compute mean δ13C of microbial groups that included more than one PLFA signature, a weighted mean was obtained with individual PLFA signature PLFA concentrations. Analyses of variance were conducted based on three-way ANOVA models with factors P fertilization, N fertilization and plant identity. Hypothesis testing significance level was corrected with a classical Bonferroni procedure. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted in the standardized matrices of PLFA δ13C signals. The analysis was implemented with the package “vegan” in R 2.12.0 [53]. The number of significant components was retrieved following the broken-stick model [54]. PCA scores of the significant components were subjected to a MANOVA analysis in SPSS v. 15.0 (SPSS, Inc. IL: Chicago) with factors P fertilization, N fertilization and plant identity to test significance of experimental treatments. Presence of differences in variance amongst the fertilization treatments were investigated through (i) Hartley’s Fmax tests separately for the scores in each principal component [55], (ii) calculation of the size of the convex hulls of combinations of the significant components as performed in earlier studies [56], [57] and (iii) Mahalanobis distances [58] separately calculated for each sample that were analysed based on a Kruskal-Wallis test. Convex hull sizes were calculated with the function convexhull.xy in the package “spatstat” in R. Finally, we tested significance of the correlation between the change in abundance of PLFAs and the change in their isotopic signal. We used as controls the PLFA δ13C data from the non-fertilized plots. For the three fertilization treatments, calculated separately for the two plants, the weighted difference in concentration with the respective non-fertilized control was calculated and the difference in signal, Δ13C approximated as Δ13C ≈ δ13C fertilized - δ13C control (21 signatures × 2 plants × 3 fertilization treatments = 126 points). Due to deviation from normality of both metrics Spearman’s rank test (Spearman’s rho or ρ test) was used. Heterogeneity in Moisture Content. Means (±S.E) of moisture content of the samples obtained in the harvest of the 10th of July 2008 grouped according to the blocking factor. (DOC) Click here for additional data file. Mahalanobis-distances-based matrix. Mahalanobis distances for the centroids of the samples following a principal component analysis. Analysis of the effect of the four fertilization treatments on the ranking of the Mahalanobis distances based on a Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significance of the effect of treatment. (DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  18 in total

Review 1.  Biodegradation of lignin by white rot fungi.

Authors:  A Leonowicz; A Matuszewska; J Luterek; D Ziegenhagen; M Wojtaś-Wasilewska; N S Cho; M Hofrichter; J Rogalski
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.495

2.  Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property.

Authors:  Michael W I Schmidt; Margaret S Torn; Samuel Abiven; Thorsten Dittmar; Georg Guggenberger; Ivan A Janssens; Markus Kleber; Ingrid Kögel-Knabner; Johannes Lehmann; David A C Manning; Paolo Nannipieri; Daniel P Rasse; Steve Weiner; Susan E Trumbore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Stable isotopes and biomarkers in microbial ecology.

Authors:  H T S Boschker; J J Middelburg
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 4.194

Review 4.  Stable carbon isotopes of lipid biomarkers: analysis of metabolites and metabolic fates of environmental microorganisms.

Authors:  Chuanlun L Zhang
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.740

5.  Rhizodeposition shapes rhizosphere microbial community structure in organic soil.

Authors:  Eric Paterson; Thomas Gebbing; Claire Abel; Allan Sim; Gillian Telfer
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Changes in microbial community characteristics and soil organic matter with nitrogen additions in two tropical forests.

Authors:  Daniela F Cusack; Whendee L Silver; Margaret S Torn; Sarah D Burton; Mary K Firestone
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Differential effects of plant diversity on functional trait variation of grass species.

Authors:  Marlén Gubsch; Nina Buchmann; Bernhard Schmid; Ernst-Detlef Schulze; Annett Lipowsky; Christiane Roscher
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Carbon isotopic fractionation in heterotrophic microbial metabolism.

Authors:  N Blair; A Leu; E Muñoz; J Olsen; E Kwong; D Des Marais
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  [Stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen in soil ecological studies].

Authors:  A V Tiunov
Journal:  Izv Akad Nauk Ser Biol       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug

10.  Microbial community utilization of recalcitrant and simple carbon compounds: impact of oak-woodland plant communities.

Authors:  Mark P Waldrop; Mary K Firestone
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-11-12       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  1 in total

1.  Proteogenomic analyses indicate bacterial methylotrophy and archaeal heterotrophy are prevalent below the grass root zone.

Authors:  Cristina N Butterfield; Zhou Li; Peter F Andeer; Susan Spaulding; Brian C Thomas; Andrea Singh; Robert L Hettich; Kenwyn B Suttle; Alexander J Probst; Susannah G Tringe; Trent Northen; Chongle Pan; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.984

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.