Literature DB >> 22961773

A time-based account of the perception of odor objects and valences.

Jonas K Olofsson1, Nicholas E Bowman, Katherine Khatibi, Jay A Gottfried.   

Abstract

Is human odor perception guided by memory or emotion? Object-centered accounts predict that recognition of unique odor qualities precedes valence decoding. Valence-centered accounts predict the opposite: that stimulus-driven valence responses precede and guide identification. In a speeded response time study, participants smelled paired odors, presented sequentially, and indicated whether the second odor in each pair belonged to the same category as the first (object evaluation task) or whether the second odor was more pleasant than the first (valence evaluation task). Object evaluation was faster and more accurate than valence evaluation. In a complementary experiment, participants performed an identification task, in which they indicated whether an odor matched the previously presented word label. Responses were quicker for odors preceded by semantically matching, rather than nonmatching, word labels, but results showed no evidence of interference from valence on nonmatching trials. These results are in accordance with object-centered accounts of odor perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22961773      PMCID: PMC3660998          DOI: 10.1177/0956797612441951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  26 in total

Review 1.  A mnemonic theory of odor perception.

Authors:  Richard J Stevenson; Robert A Boakes
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  SEMANTIC POWER MEASURED THROUGH THE INTERFERENCE OF WORDS WITH COLOR-NAMING.

Authors:  G S KLEIN
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1964-12

3.  Cognitive modulation of olfactory processing.

Authors:  Ivan E de Araujo; Edmund T Rolls; Maria Inés Velazco; Christian Margot; Isabelle Cayeux
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  'Sniffin' sticks': olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold.

Authors:  T Hummel; B Sekinger; S R Wolf; E Pauli; G Kobal
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Olfactory sensory-specific satiety in humans.

Authors:  E T Rolls; J H Rolls
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1997-03

6.  Information coding in the rodent prefrontal cortex. I. Single-neuron activity in orbitofrontal cortex compared with that in pyriform cortex.

Authors:  G Schoenbaum; H Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 1--Correlation within subjects.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-02-18

8.  Tracing the time course of picture--word processing.

Authors:  M C Smith; L E Magee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-12

9.  Application of multidimensional scaling to ratings of foods for obese and normal weight individuals.

Authors:  S S Schiffman; G Musante; J Conger
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1978-09

10.  Odor quality coding and categorization in human posterior piriform cortex.

Authors:  James D Howard; Jane Plailly; Marcus Grueschow; John-Dylan Haynes; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  16 in total

1.  Dorsolateral caudate nucleus differentiates cocaine from natural reward-associated contextual cues.

Authors:  Hua-Shan Liu; Svetlana Chefer; Hanbing Lu; Karine Guillem; William Rea; Pradeep Kurup; Yihong Yang; Laura Peoples; Elliot A Stein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The muted sense: neurocognitive limitations of olfactory language.

Authors:  Jonas K Olofsson; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  Cortical odor processing in health and disease.

Authors:  Donald A Wilson; Wenjin Xu; Benjamin Sadrian; Emmanuelle Courtiol; Yaniv Cohen; Dylan C Barnes
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.453

4.  Default mode network deactivation during odor-visual association.

Authors:  Prasanna R Karunanayaka; Donald A Wilson; Michael J Tobia; Brittany E Martinez; Mark D Meadowcroft; Paul J Eslinger; Qing X Yang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of odor representations in the human brain revealed by EEG decoding.

Authors:  Mugihiko Kato; Toshiki Okumura; Yasuhiro Tsubo; Junya Honda; Masashi Sugiyama; Kazushige Touhara; Masako Okamoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  High and low roads to odor valence? A choice response-time study.

Authors:  Jonas K Olofsson; Nicholas E Bowman; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Time to smell: a cascade model of human olfactory perception based on response-time (RT) measurement.

Authors:  Jonas K Olofsson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-04

8.  Dynamics of autonomic nervous system responses and facial expressions to odors.

Authors:  Wei He; Sanne Boesveldt; Cees de Graaf; René A de Wijk
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-13

Review 9.  Human olfactory consciousness and cognition: its unusual features may not result from unusual functions but from limited neocortical processing resources.

Authors:  Richard J Stevenson; Tuki Attuquayefio
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-01

10.  Quality-space theory in olfaction.

Authors:  Benjamin D Young; Andreas Keller; David Rosenthal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.