Literature DB >> 22961613

Significance of perceived social expectation and implications to conservation education: turtle conservation as a case study.

Alex Y Lo1, Alex T Chow, Sze Man Cheung.   

Abstract

The likelihood of participating in wildlife conservation programs is dependent on social influences and circumstances. This view is validated by a case study of behavioral intention to support conservation of Asian turtles. A total of 776 college students in China completed a questionnaire survey designed to identify factors associated with their intention to support conservation. A regression model explained 48 % of variance in the level of intention. Perceived social expectation was the strongest predictor, followed by attitudes toward turtle protection and perceived behavioral control, altogether explaining 44 %. Strong ethics and socio-economic variables had some statistical significant impacts and accounted for 3 % of the variance. The effects of general environmental awareness, trust and responsibility ascription were modest. Knowledge about turtles was a weak predictor. We conclude that perceived social expectation is a limiting factor of conservation behavior. Sustained interest and commitment to conservation can be created by enhancing positive social influences. Conservation educators should explore the potential of professionally supported, group-based actions that can nurture a sense of collective achievement as part of an educational campaign.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22961613     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9926-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  7 in total

1.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  C J Armitage; M Conner
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-12

2.  A framework for assessing collaborative capacity in community-based public forest management.

Authors:  Antony S Cheng; Victoria E Sturtevant
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Resident motivations and willingness-to-pay for urban biodiversity conservation in Guangzhou (China).

Authors:  Wendy Y Chen; C Y Jim
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Recreational benefits of urban forests: explaining visitors' willingness to pay in the context of the theory of planned behavior.

Authors:  Katrin Bernath; Anna Roschewitz
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 6.789

5.  Results of community deliberation about social impacts of ecological restoration: comparing public input of self-selected versus actively engaged community members.

Authors:  Charles C Harris; Erik A Nielsen; Dennis R Becker; Dale J Blahna; William J McLaughlin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Improving voluntary environmental management programs: facilitating learning and adaptation.

Authors:  Kenneth D Genskow; Danielle M Wood
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  What makes them pay? Values of volunteer tourists working for sea turtle conservation.

Authors:  Lisa M Campbell; Christy Smith
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.266

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Sociological factors influencing the performance of organic activities in Iran.

Authors:  Mahsa Fatemi; Kurosh Rezaei-Moghaddam
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2020-05-11

2.  Dynamic Evaluation of Ecological Service Function Value of Qilihai Wetland in Tianjin.

Authors:  Chen Chen; ChaoFeng Shao; YanMin Shi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.