Literature DB >> 20354852

Resident motivations and willingness-to-pay for urban biodiversity conservation in Guangzhou (China).

Wendy Y Chen1, C Y Jim.   

Abstract

The monetary assessment of biodiversity measures the welfare damages brought by biodiversity losses and the cost-benefit analysis of conservation projects in a socio-economic context. The contingent valuation method could include motivational factors to strengthen economic analysis of nature conservation. This study analyzed Guangzhou residents' motivations and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for an urban biodiversity conservation program in the National Baiyun Mountain Scenic Area (BMSA). The peri-urban natural site, offering refuge to some endemic species, is under increasing development pressures for recreational and residential use. A questionnaire survey was conducted in the Guangzhou metropolitan area during June to October 2007. We interviewed face-to-face 720 stratified sampled households to probe residents' attitudes towards the city's environmental issues, motivations for urban nature conservation, and WTP for biodiversity conservation. Principal component analysis identified five motivational factors, including environmental benefit, ecological diversity, nature-culture interaction, landscape-recreation function, and intergenerational sustainability, which illustrated the general economic values of urban nature. Logistic regression was applied to predict the probability of people being willing to pay for the urban biodiversity conservation in BMSA. The significant predictors of WTP included household income and the factor nature-culture interaction. The median WTP estimated RMB149/household (about US$19.5/household) per year and an aggregate of RMB291 million (approximately US$38.2 million) annually to support the urban conservation project. Including public motivations into contingent valuation presents a promising approach to conduct cost-benefit analysis of public projects in China.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20354852     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-010-9478-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  8 in total

Review 1.  Economic reasons for conserving wild nature.

Authors:  Andrew Balmford; Aaron Bruner; Philip Cooper; Robert Costanza; Stephen Farber; Rhys E Green; Martin Jenkins; Paul Jefferiss; Valma Jessamy; Joah Madden; Kat Munro; Norman Myers; Shahid Naeem; Jouni Paavola; Matthew Rayment; Sergio Rosendo; Joan Roughgarden; Kate Trumper; R Kerry Turner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Development of indicators to assess economic vulnerabilities to changes in ecosystem services: case study of counties in Maryland, USA.

Authors:  Lisa A Wainger; Dennis M King; Joyce A Cantrell; Sandra L Bird
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  China's environment in a globalizing world.

Authors:  Jianguo Liu; Jared Diamond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The pigeon paradox: dependence of global conservation on urban nature.

Authors:  Robert R Dunn; Michael C Gavin; Monica C Sanchez; Jennifer N Solomon
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Evaluation of ambient air quality in Guangzhou, China.

Authors:  Kai Zhou; You-hua Ye; Qiang Liu; Ai-jun Liu; Shao-lin Peng
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.565

6.  The environment in the People's Republic of China 50 years on.

Authors:  R L Edmonds
Journal:  China Q       Date:  1999

7.  Water pollution and degradation in Pearl River Delta, South China.

Authors:  Zhaoyu Zhu; Qinglu Deng; Houyun Zhou; Tingping Ouyang; Yaoqiu Kuang; Ningsheng Huang; Yulou Qiao
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.129

8.  Exposure-response functions for health effects of ambient air pollution applicable for China -- a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kristin Aunan; Xiao-Chuan Pan
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 7.963

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Replacing rubber plantations by rain forest in Southwest China--who would gain and how much?

Authors:  Michael Ahlheim; Tobias Börger; Oliver Frör
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Significance of perceived social expectation and implications to conservation education: turtle conservation as a case study.

Authors:  Alex Y Lo; Alex T Chow; Sze Man Cheung
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 3.266

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.