Literature DB >> 22960165

Assessment of the sensitivity of detecting drug-induced QTc changes using subject-specific rate correction.

Raymundo Cassani González1, Elien B Engels, Bruno Dubé, Réginald Nadeau, Alain Vinet, A Robert LeBlanc, Marcio Sturmer, Giuliano Becker, Teresa Kus, Vincent Jacquemet.   

Abstract

AIMS: To quantify the sensitivity of QT heart-rate correction methods for detecting drug-induced QTc changes in thorough QT studies.
METHODS: Twenty-four-hour Holter ECGs were analyzed in 66 normal subjects during placebo and moxifloxacin delivery (single oral dose). QT and RR time series were extracted. Three QTc computation methods were used: (1) Fridericia's formula, (2) Fridericia's formula with hysteresis reduction, and (3) a subject-specific approach with transfer function-based hysteresis reduction and three-parameter non-linear fitting of the QT-RR relation. QTc distributions after placebo and moxifloxacin delivery were compared in sliding time windows using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) served as a measure to quantify the ability of each method to detect moxifloxacin-induced QTc prolongation.
RESULTS: Moxifloxacin prolonged the QTc by 10.6 ± 6.6 ms at peak effect. The AUC was significantly larger after hysteresis reduction (0.87 ± 0.13 vs. 0.82 ± 0.12, p<0.01) at peak effect, indicating a better discriminating capability. Subject-specific correction further increased the AUC to 0.91 ± 0.11 (p<0.01 vs. Fridericia with hysteresis reduction). The performance of the subject-specific approach was the consequence of a substantially lower intra-subject QTc standard deviation (5.7 ± 1.1 ms vs. 8.8 ± 1.2 ms for Fridericia).
CONCLUSION: The ROC curve provides a tool for quantitative comparison of QT heart rate correction methods in the context of detecting drug-induced QTc prolongation. Results support a broader use of subject-specific QT correction.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22960165     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2012.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  3 in total

1.  Balancing the Need for Personalization of QT Correction and Generalization of Study Results: Going Beyond Thorough QT Studies.

Authors:  Igor Diemberger; Emanuel Raschi; Gianluca Trifirò
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Physiologic heart rate dependency of the PQ interval and its sex differences.

Authors:  Ondřej Toman; Katerina Hnatkova; Peter Smetana; Katharina M Huster; Martina Šišáková; Petra Barthel; Tomáš Novotný; Georg Schmidt; Marek Malik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Sex and Rate Change Differences in QT/RR Hysteresis in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Irena Andršová; Katerina Hnatkova; Martina Šišáková; Ondřej Toman; Peter Smetana; Katharina M Huster; Petra Barthel; Tomáš Novotný; Georg Schmidt; Marek Malik
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.566

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.