Literature DB >> 2295944

Nonuniformity of tumor dose in radioimmunotherapy.

J L Humm1, L M Cobb.   

Abstract

The conventional approach to calculating tumor radiation dose from internally administered radioisotopes is by the MIRD schema. The raw input data for such dose calculations is obtained by immunoscintigraphic methods, PLANAR or SPECT imaging. Limitations in the spatial resolution of these techniques can lead to a considerable underestimate of the gross variation in tumor dose. The use of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies for therapy can result in large nonuniformities in tumor dose. This paper discusses how antibody distribution can influence the energy deposition in the nuclei of target cells. Heterogeneity of antibody binding will lead to an expected decrease in the effectiveness of the radiation delivered. However, enhanced cell killing is possible if the radiolabeled Ab binds to the cell surface membrane and may be further enhanced if the Ab is internalized. Calculations are presented for two cases: (a) a three-dimensional random packing arrangement of cells as a model of the astructural nondifferentiated form seen in some tumors, and (b) differentiated carcinoma of the colon with the cells in tubules. Results for the magnitude of the mean energy deposition to individual cell nuclei from: (a) cell membrane bound 211At, 199Au, 131I, and 90Y-labeled Abs, and (b) a uniform distribution of these sources, as a function of internuclear distance for the two histologies are presented. Energy deposition in tumor cell nuclei from membrane bound radiolabeled antibody may be several times greater than estimated with the assumption of a uniform source distribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2295944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  31 in total

1.  When may a nonuniform distribution of 131I be considered uniform? An experimental basis for multicellular dosimetry.

Authors:  Prasad V S V Neti; Roger W Howell
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Monoclonal antibody administration. Current clinical pharmacokinetic status and future trends.

Authors:  R H Begent; R B Pedley; J Begent
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Nuclear medicine 2000.

Authors:  O Schober
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1992

Review 4.  Targeted alpha-therapy: past, present, future?

Authors:  Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 4.390

Review 5.  Challenges and progress in predicting biological responses to incorporated radioactivity.

Authors:  R W Howell; P V S V Neti; M Pinto; B I Gerashchenko; V R Narra; E I Azzam
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  Biological response to nonuniform distributions of (210)Po in multicellular clusters.

Authors:  Prasad V S V Neti; Roger W Howell
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  A model of cellular dosimetry for macroscopic tumors in radiopharmaceutical therapy.

Authors:  Robert F Hobbs; Sébastien Baechler; De-Xue Fu; Caroline Esaias; Martin G Pomper; Richard F Ambinder; George Sgouros
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Proliferation and the advantage of longer-lived radionuclides in radioimmunotherapy.

Authors:  R W Howell; S M Goddu; D V Rao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Three-dimensional imaging-based radiobiological dosimetry.

Authors:  George Sgouros; Eric Frey; Richard Wahl; Bin He; Andrew Prideaux; Robert Hobbs
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 10.  Therapeutic radionuclides: biophysical and radiobiologic principles.

Authors:  Amin I Kassis
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.