Literature DB >> 21815364

A model of cellular dosimetry for macroscopic tumors in radiopharmaceutical therapy.

Robert F Hobbs1, Sébastien Baechler, De-Xue Fu, Caroline Esaias, Martin G Pomper, Richard F Ambinder, George Sgouros.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the radiopharmaceutical therapy approach to the fight against cancer, in particular when it comes to translating laboratory results to the clinical setting, modeling has served as an invaluable tool for guidance and for understanding the processes operating at the cellular level and how these relate to macroscopic observables. Tumor control probability (TCP) is the dosimetric end point quantity of choice which relates to experimental and clinical data: it requires knowledge of individual cellular absorbed doses since it depends on the assessment of the treatment's ability to kill each and every cell. Macroscopic tumors, seen in both clinical and experimental studies, contain too many cells to be modeled individually in Monte Carlo simulation; yet, in particular for low ratios of decays to cells, a cell-based model that does not smooth away statistical considerations associated with low activity is a necessity. The authors present here an adaptation of the simple sphere-based model from which cellular level dosimetry for macroscopic tumors and their end point quantities, such as TCP, may be extrapolated more reliably.
METHODS: Ten homogenous spheres representing tumors of different sizes were constructed in GEANT4. The radionuclide 131I was randomly allowed to decay for each model size and for seven different ratios of number of decays to number of cells, N(r): 1000, 500, 200, 100, 50, 20, and 10 decays per cell. The deposited energy was collected in radial bins and divided by the bin mass to obtain the average bin absorbed dose. To simulate a cellular model, the number of cells present in each bin was calculated and an absorbed dose attributed to each cell equal to the bin average absorbed dose with a randomly determined adjustment based on a Gaussian probability distribution with a width equal to the statistical uncertainty consistent with the ratio of decays to cells, i.e., equal to Nr-1/2. From dose volume histograms the surviving fraction of cells, equivalent uniform dose (EUD), and TCP for the different scenarios were calculated. Comparably sized spherical models containing individual spherical cells (15 microm diameter) in hexagonal lattices were constructed, and Monte Carlo simulations were executed for all the same previous scenarios. The dosimetric quantities were calculated and compared to the adjusted simple sphere model results. The model was then applied to the Bortezomib-induced enzyme-targeted radiotherapy (BETR) strategy of targeting Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-expressing cancers.
RESULTS: The TCP values were comparable to within 2% between the adjusted simple sphere and full cellular models. Additionally, models were generated for a nonuniform distribution of activity, and results were compared between the adjusted spherical and cellular models with similar comparability. The TCP values from the experimental macroscopic tumor results were consistent with the experimental observations for BETR-treated 1 g EBV-expressing lymphoma tumors in mice.
CONCLUSIONS: The adjusted spherical model presented here provides more accurate TCP values than simple spheres, on par with full cellular Monte Carlo simulations while maintaining the simplicity of the simple sphere model. This model provides a basis for complementing and understanding laboratory and clinical results pertaining to radiopharmaceutical therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21815364      PMCID: PMC3117894          DOI: 10.1118/1.3576051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  39 in total

1.  Absorbed doses for internal radiotherapy from 22 beta-emitting radionuclides: beta dosimetry of small spheres.

Authors:  M Bardiès; J F Chatal
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Generation of dose-volume histograms using Monte Carlo simulations on a multicellular model in radionuclide therapy.

Authors:  Rajko Spaic; Radovan Ilic; Milos Dragovic; Bratislav Petrovic
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.099

3.  Accuracy of the photon and electron physics in GEANT4 for radiotherapy applications.

Authors:  Emily Poon; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Log normal distribution of cellular uptake of radioactivity: implications for biologic responses to radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Prasad V S V Neti; Roger W Howell
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Dosimetric characterization of radionuclides for systemic tumor therapy: influence of particle range, photon emission, and subcellular distribution.

Authors:  Helena Uusijärvi; Peter Bernhardt; Thomas Ericsson; Eva Forssell-Aronsson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Michael G Stabin; Richard B Sparks; Eric Crowe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Virus-associated tumor imaging by induction of viral gene expression.

Authors:  De-Xue Fu; Yvette C Tanhehco; Jianmeng Chen; Catherine A Foss; James J Fox; Victor Lemas; Ja-Mun Chong; Richard F Ambinder; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Limitations of a TCP model incorporating population heterogeneity.

Authors:  B Warkentin; P Stavrev; N A Stavreva; B G Fallone
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Dosimetric aspects of radiolabeled antibodies for tumor therapy.

Authors:  J L Humm
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Imaging herpes virus thymidine kinase gene transfer and expression by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  J G Tjuvajev; N Avril; T Oku; T Sasajima; T Miyagawa; R Joshi; M Safer; B Beattie; G DiResta; F Daghighian; F Augensen; J Koutcher; J Zweit; J Humm; S M Larson; R Finn; R Blasberg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  6 in total

1.  Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.

Authors:  George Sgouros
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  A nephron-based model of the kidneys for macro-to-micro α-particle dosimetry.

Authors:  Robert F Hobbs; Hong Song; David L Huso; Margaret H Sundel; George Sgouros
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A bone marrow toxicity model for ²²³Ra alpha-emitter radiopharmaceutical therapy.

Authors:  Robert F Hobbs; Hong Song; Christopher J Watchman; Wesley E Bolch; Anne-Kirsti Aksnes; Thomas Ramdahl; Glenn D Flux; George Sgouros
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Dosimetric Effects of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-assisted Radiotherapy Planning: Dose Optimization for Target Volumes at High Risk and Analytic Radiobiological Dose Evaluation.

Authors:  Ji-Yeon Park; Tae Suk Suh; Jeong-Woo Lee; Kook-Jin Ahn; Hae-Jin Park; Bo-Young Choe; Semie Hong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Microdosimetry for targeted alpha therapy of cancer.

Authors:  Chen-Yu Huang; Susanna Guatelli; Bradley M Oborn; Barry J Allen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  Targeting Micrometastases: The Effect of Heterogeneous Radionuclide Distribution on Tumor Control Probability.

Authors:  Nadia Falzone; Boon Quan Lee; Sarah Able; Javian Malcolm; Samantha Terry; Yasir Alayed; Katherine Anne Vallis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 11.082

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.