Literature DB >> 22959042

Laxity of the normal glenohumeral joint: A quantitative in vivo assessment.

D T Harryman1, J A Sidles, S L Harris, F A Matsen.   

Abstract

It is critical that surgeons comprehend the normal laxity of the glenohumeral joint (1) to assist them in diagnosing conditions of clinical instability and (2) to help define a therapeutic end point for the management of shoulders with excessive stiffness. In clinical practice this joint laxity is judged by standard manual tests. We report a quantitative study of the clinical in vivo laxity of the normal shoulders of eight male volunteers. To our knowledge this is the first time that the laxity revealed on standard manual clinical tests has been quantified in vivo. The relative motions of the humerus and scapula were determined with an electromagnetic spatial tracker. This device was pinned percutaneously to the humerus and scapula of each of eight normal male volunteers of ages 25 to 45 years. An experienced shoulder surgeon carried out standard manual clinical tests of glenohumeral laxity while the resulting displacements of the humeral head relative to the glenoid were measured. Spatial tracker data indicated that for each of the different tests, the positions of the glenohumeral and scapulothoracic joints were reproducible for a given subject and among subjects. Substantial glenohumeral translations were measured during those manual laxity tests in which the joint was not at the limit of its range of motion: the drawer test, 7.8 ± 4.0 mm anterior and 7.9 ± 5.6 mm posterior; the sulcus test, 10.6 ± 3.8 mm inferior; and the push-pull test, 9.0 ± 6.3 mm posterior. A minimal translation of 0.3 ± 2.5 mm was measured during the fulcrum test in which the glenohumeral ligaments were under tension. The observed translations were reproducible in each subject's shoulder. On the other hand, there was marked variability among subjects. Even though manual laxity tests are a standard part of the clinical evaluation of the shoulder, our finding that normal glenohumeral joints show substantial translations indicates that translation on clinical manual laxity testing is not in and of itself a sufficient indication for surgical stabilization.
Copyright © 1992 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Year:  2009        PMID: 22959042     DOI: 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80123-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  22 in total

1.  The effect of isolated labrum resection on shoulder stability.

Authors:  Nicole Pouliart; Olivier Gagey
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Orientation feedback during simulated simple translation tests has little clinical significance on the magnitude and precision of glenohumeral joint translations.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Susan M Moore; Patrick J McMahon; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Effects of external rotation on anteroposterior translations in the shoulder: a pilot study.

Authors:  Andrew J Brown; Richard E Debski; Carrie A Voycheck; Patrick J McMahon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Current concepts in shoulder examination of the overhead athlete.

Authors:  Robert Manske; Todd Ellenbecker
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-10

Review 5.  Evaluation of shoulder laxity.

Authors:  E G McFarland; B M Torpey; L A Curl
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Glenoid retroversion is an important factor for humeral head centration and the biomechanics of posterior shoulder stability.

Authors:  Florian B Imhoff; Roland S Camenzind; Elifho Obopilwe; Mark P Cote; Julian Mehl; Knut Beitzel; Andreas B Imhoff; Augustus D Mazzocca; Robert A Arciero; Felix G E Dyrna
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  ULTRASOUND MEASUREMENTS AND OBJECTIVE FORCES OF GLENOHUMERAL TRANSLATIONS DURING SHOULDER ACCESSORY PASSIVE MOTION TESTING IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS.

Authors:  Nancy Henderson; Haley Worst; Ryan Decarreau; George Davies
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-10

8.  The contribution of the scapula to active shoulder motion and self-assessed function in three hundred and fifty two patients prior to elective shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Jason E Hsu; David Andrew Hulet; Chris McDonald; Anastasia Whitson; Stacy M Russ; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Finite element modelling of the glenohumeral capsule can help assess the tested region during a clinical exam.

Authors:  Benjamin J Ellis; Nicholas J Drury; Susan M Moore; Patrick J McMahon; Jeffrey A Weiss; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.763

10.  Glenohumeral Stiffness Response Between Men and Women for Anterior, Posterior, and Inferior Translation.

Authors:  Paul A Borsa; Eric L Sauers; Derald E Herling
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.