Literature DB >> 22958949

Comparison of different liquid anaerobic digestion effluents as inocula and nitrogen sources for solid-state batch anaerobic digestion of corn stover.

Fuqing Xu1, Jian Shi, Wen Lv, Zhongtang Yu, Yebo Li.   

Abstract

Effluents from three liquid anaerobic digesters, fed with municipal sewage sludge, food waste, or dairy waste, were evaluated as inocula and nitrogen sources for solid-state batch anaerobic digestion of corn stover in mesophilic reactors. Three feedstock-to-effluent (F/E) ratios (i.e., 2, 4, and 6) were tested for each effluent. At an F/E ratio of 2, the reactor inoculated by dairy waste effluent achieved the highest methane yield of 238.5L/kg VS(feed), while at an F/E ratio of 4, the reactor inoculated by food waste effluent achieved the highest methane yield of 199.6L/kg VS(feed). The microbial population and chemical composition of the three effluents were substantially different. Food waste effluent had the largest population of acetoclastic methanogens, while dairy waste effluent had the largest populations of cellulolytic and xylanolytic bacteria. Dairy waste also had the highest C/N ratio of 8.5 and the highest alkalinity of 19.3g CaCO(3)/kg. The performance of solid-state batch anaerobic digestion reactors was closely related to the microbial status in the liquid anaerobic digestion effluents.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22958949     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation and modelling of methane production from corn stover pretreated with various physicochemical techniques.

Authors:  María José Fernández-Rodríguez; Maryam Mushtaq; Li Tian; Antonia Jiménez-Rodríguez; Bárbara Rincón; Brandon H Gilroyed; Rafael Borja
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2021-08-13

2.  Using the properties of soil to speed up the start-up process, enhance process stability, and improve the methane content and yield of solid-state anaerobic digestion of alkaline-pretreated poplar processing residues.

Authors:  Yiqing Yao; Yang Luo; Tian Li; Yingxue Yang; Hongmei Sheng; Nolan Virgo; Yun Xiang; Yuan Song; Hua Zhang; Lizhe An
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 6.040

3.  Biochemical methane potential of microalgae biomass using different microbial inocula.

Authors:  Cristina Gonzalez-Fernandez; Santiago Barreiro-Vescovo; Ignacio de Godos; Maikel Fernandez; Arbib Zouhayr; Mercedes Ballesteros
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 6.040

4.  Adaptation of Methanogenic Inocula to Anaerobic Digestion of Maize Silage.

Authors:  Martyna Wojcieszak; Adam Pyzik; Krzysztof Poszytek; Pawel S Krawczyk; Adam Sobczak; Leszek Lipinski; Otton Roubinek; Jacek Palige; Aleksandra Sklodowska; Lukasz Drewniak
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  The Effects of Different Oxytetracycline and Copper Treatments on the Performance of Anaerobic Digesters and the Dynamics of Bacterial Communities.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Xin Ke; Wei Sun; Guangcai Zhang; Xiaodan Gao; Haijun Zhang; Weiyun Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Substrate-to-inoculum ratio drives solid-state anaerobic digestion of unamended grape marc and cheese whey.

Authors:  Josue Kassongo; Esmaeil Shahsavari; Andrew S Ball
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Microbial ecology of anaerobic digesters: the key players of anaerobiosis.

Authors:  Fayyaz Ali Shah; Qaisar Mahmood; Mohammad Maroof Shah; Arshid Pervez; Saeed Ahmad Asad
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-19

8.  Biomethane Production from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Selected Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW) with Sewage Sludge: Effect of the Inoculum to Substrate Ratio (ISR) and Mixture Composition on Process Performances.

Authors:  Santo Fabio Corsino; Michele Torregrossa; Gaspare Viviani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.