Brett G Mitchell1, Anne Gardner. 1. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, PO BOX 256, Dickson, ACT, Australia. bgmitc001@myacu.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is believed that Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) contributes to a prolongation of length of stay (LOS). Recent literature suggests that models previously used to determine LOS due to infection have overestimated LOS, compared to newer statistical models. The purpose of this review is to understand the impact that CDI has on LOS and in doing so, describe the methodological approaches used. AIM: First, to investigate and describe the reported prolongation of LOS in hospitalised patients with CDI. Second, to describe the methodologies used for determining excess LOS. METHODS: An integrative review method was used. Papers were reviewed and analysed individually and themes were combined using integrative methods. RESULTS: Findings from all studies suggested that CDI contributes to a longer LOS in hospital. In studies that compared persons with and without CDI, the difference in the LOS between the two groups ranged from 2.8days to 16.1days. Potential limitations with data analysis were identified, given that no study fully addressed the issue of a time-dependent bias when examining the LOS. Recent literature suggests that a multi-state model should be used to manage the issue of time-dependent bias. CONCLUSION: Studies examining LOS attributed to CDI varied considerably in design and data collected. Future studies examining LOS related to CDI and other healthcare associated infections should consider capturing the timing of infection in order to be able to employ a multi-state model for data analysis.
BACKGROUND: It is believed that Clostridium difficileinfection (CDI) contributes to a prolongation of length of stay (LOS). Recent literature suggests that models previously used to determine LOS due to infection have overestimated LOS, compared to newer statistical models. The purpose of this review is to understand the impact that CDI has on LOS and in doing so, describe the methodological approaches used. AIM: First, to investigate and describe the reported prolongation of LOS in hospitalised patients with CDI. Second, to describe the methodologies used for determining excess LOS. METHODS: An integrative review method was used. Papers were reviewed and analysed individually and themes were combined using integrative methods. RESULTS: Findings from all studies suggested that CDI contributes to a longer LOS in hospital. In studies that compared persons with and without CDI, the difference in the LOS between the two groups ranged from 2.8days to 16.1days. Potential limitations with data analysis were identified, given that no study fully addressed the issue of a time-dependent bias when examining the LOS. Recent literature suggests that a multi-state model should be used to manage the issue of time-dependent bias. CONCLUSION: Studies examining LOS attributed to CDI varied considerably in design and data collected. Future studies examining LOS related to CDI and other healthcare associated infections should consider capturing the timing of infection in order to be able to employ a multi-state model for data analysis.
Authors: Nicholas Graves; Stephan Harbarth; Jan Beyersmann; Adrian Barnett; Kate Halton; Ben Cooper Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Nicholas Graves; Diana Weinhold; Edward Tong; Frances Birrell; Shane Doidge; Prabha Ramritu; Kate Halton; David Lairson; Michael Whitby Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2007-02-20 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Marc Zerey; B Lauren Paton; Amy E Lincourt; Keith S Gersin; Kent W Kercher; B Todd Heniford Journal: Surg Infect (Larchmt) Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 2.150
Authors: Xiaoyan Song; John G Bartlett; Kathleen Speck; April Naegeli; Karen Carroll; Trish M Perl Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Erik R Dubberke; Anne M Butler; Kimberly A Reske; Denis Agniel; Margaret A Olsen; Gina D'Angelo; L Clifford McDonald; Victoria J Fraser Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Tara Lagu; Mihaela S Stefan; Sarah Haessler; Thomas L Higgins; Michael B Rothberg; Brian H Nathanson; Nicholas S Hannon; Jay S Steingrub; Peter K Lindenauer Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Maureen T Taylor; Janine McCready; George Broukhanski; Sakshi Kirpalaney; Haydon Lutz; Jeff Powis Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Janne C Mewes; Michael S Pulia; Michael K Mansour; Michael R Broyles; H Bryant Nguyen; Lotte M Steuten Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Thomas Heister; Martin Wolkewitz; Philip Hehn; Jan Wolff; Markus Dettenkofer; Hajo Grundmann; Klaus Kaier Journal: Cost Eff Resour Alloc Date: 2019-08-01