Literature DB >> 22958194

F8 haplotype and inhibitor risk: results from the Hemophilia Inhibitor Genetics Study (HIGS) Combined Cohort.

J Schwarz1, J Astermark, E D Menius, M Carrington, S M Donfield, E D Gomperts, G W Nelson, J Oldenburg, A Pavlova, A D Shapiro, C A Winkler, E Berntorp.   

Abstract

Ancestral background, specifically African descent, confers higher risk for development of inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) in haemophilia A. It has been suggested that differences in the distribution of FVIII gene (F8) haplotypes, and mismatch between endogenous F8 haplotypes and those comprising products used for treatment could contribute to risk. Data from the Hemophilia Inhibitor Genetics Study (HIGS) Combined Cohort were used to determine the association between F8 haplotype 3 (H3) vs. haplotypes 1 and 2 (H1 + H2) and inhibitor risk among individuals of genetically determined African descent. Other variables known to affect inhibitor risk including type of F8 mutation and human leucocyte antigen (HLA) were included in the analysis. A second research question regarding risk related to mismatch in endogenous F8 haplotype and recombinant FVIII products used for treatment was addressed. Haplotype 3 was associated with higher inhibitor risk among those genetically identified (N = 49) as of African ancestry, but the association did not remain significant after adjustment for F8 mutation type and the HLA variables. Among subjects of all racial ancestries enrolled in HIGS who reported early use of recombinant products (N = 223), mismatch in endogenous haplotype and the FVIII proteins constituting the products used did not confer greater risk for inhibitor development. Haplotype 3 was not an independent predictor of inhibitor risk. Furthermore, our findings did not support a higher risk of inhibitors in the presence of a haplotype mismatch between the FVIII molecule infused and that of the individual.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22958194      PMCID: PMC3521089          DOI: 10.1111/hae.12004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  18 in total

Review 1.  The role of genetics in inhibitor formation.

Authors:  J C Gill
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 2.  Mutation profiling in haemophilia A.

Authors:  J Oldenburg
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.249

3.  A multicenter study of recombinant factor VIII (Recombinate) in previously treated patients with hemophilia A. The Recombinate Previously Treated Patient Study Group.

Authors:  G C White; S Courter; G L Bray; M Lee; E D Gomperts
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies.

Authors:  Daniel Falush; Matthew Stephens; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The Malmö International Brother Study (MIBS): further support for genetic predisposition to inhibitor development in hemophilia patients.

Authors:  J Astermark; E Berntorp; G C White; B L Kroner
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.287

6.  Safety and efficacy of KOGENATE Bayer in previously untreated patients (PUPs) and minimally treated patients (MTPs).

Authors:  P L F Giangrande
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 7.  Inhibitor development in correlation to factor VIII genotypes.

Authors:  J Oldenburg; O El-Maarri; R Schwaab
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.287

8.  Inversions disrupting the factor VIII gene are a common cause of severe haemophilia A.

Authors:  D Lakich; H H Kazazian; S E Antonarakis; J Gitschier
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  A multicenter study of recombinant factor VIII (recombinate): safety, efficacy, and inhibitor risk in previously untreated patients with hemophilia A. The Recombinate Study Group.

Authors:  G L Bray; E D Gomperts; S Courter; R Gruppo; E M Gordon; M Manco-Johnson; A Shapiro; E Scheibel; G White; M Lee
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Clinical evaluation of an advanced category antihaemophilic factor prepared using a plasma/albumin-free method: pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety in previously treated patients with haemophilia A.

Authors:  M D Tarantino; P W Collins; C R M Hay; A D Shapiro; R A Gruppo; E Berntorp; G L Bray; S A Tonetta; P C Schroth; A D Retzios; S S Rogy; M G Sensel; B M Ewenstein
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.287

View more
  10 in total

1.  Game, set, match for factor VIII mismatch?

Authors:  Connie H Miller
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Alloantibodies to therapeutic factor VIII in hemophilia A: the role of von Willebrand factor in regulating factor VIII immunogenicity.

Authors:  Johannes Oldenburg; Sébastien Lacroix-Desmazes; David Lillicrap
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Factor VIII gene variants and inhibitor risk in African American hemophilia A patients.

Authors:  Devi Gunasekera; Ruth A Ettinger; Shelley Nakaya Fletcher; Eddie A James; Maochang Liu; John C Barrett; Janice Withycombe; Dana C Matthews; Melinda S Epstein; Richard J Hughes; Kathleen P Pratt
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  The intron-22-inverted F8 locus permits factor VIII synthesis: explanation for low inhibitor risk and a role for pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Zuben E Sauna; Jay N Lozier; Carol K Kasper; Chen Yanover; Timothy Nichols; Tom E Howard
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Severe Hemophilia A in a Male Old English Sheep Dog with a C→T Transition that Created a Premature Stop Codon in Factor VIII.

Authors:  Jay N Lozier; Mark T Kloos; Elizabeth P Merricks; Nathaly Lemoine; Margaret H Whitford; Robin A Raymer; Dwight A Bellinger; Timothy C Nichols
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 6.  FVIII inhibitors: pathogenesis and avoidance.

Authors:  Jan Astermark
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Engineering less immunogenic and antigenic FVIII proteins.

Authors:  Kathleen P Pratt
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 4.868

Review 8.  Factor VIII: Perspectives on Immunogenicity and Tolerogenic Strategies.

Authors:  David W Scott; Kathleen P Pratt
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 8.786

9.  Inhibitor incidence in an unselected cohort of previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia B: a PedNet study.

Authors:  Christoph Male; Nadine G Andersson; Anne Rafowicz; Ri Liesner; Karin Kurnik; Kathelijn Fischer; Helen Platokouki; Elena Santagostino; Hervé Chambost; Beatrice Nolan; Christoph Königs; Gili Kenet; Rolf Ljung; Marijke Van den Berg
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 9.941

10.  Endogenous factor VIII synthesis from the intron 22-inverted F8 locus may modulate the immunogenicity of replacement therapy for hemophilia A.

Authors:  Gouri Shankar Pandey; Chen Yanover; Lisa M Miller-Jenkins; Susan Garfield; Shelley A Cole; Joanne E Curran; Eric K Moses; Natalia Rydz; Vijaya Simhadri; Chava Kimchi-Sarfaty; David Lillicrap; Kevin R Viel; Teresa M Przytycka; Glenn F Pierce; Tom E Howard; Zuben E Sauna
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 53.440

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.