Literature DB >> 22956794

The speed of morality: a high-density electrical neuroimaging study.

Jean Decety1, Stephanie Cacioppo.   

Abstract

Neuroscience research indicates that moral reasoning is underpinned by distinct neural networks including the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), amygdala, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex, which support communication between computational systems underlying affective states, cognitions, and motivational processes. To characterize real-time neural processing underpinning moral computations, high-density event-related potentials were measured in participants while they viewed short, morally laden visual scenarios depicting intentional and accidental harmful actions. Current source density maxima in the right pSTS as fast as 62 ms poststimulus first distinguished intentional vs. accidental actions. Responses in the amygdala/temporal pole (122 ms) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (182 ms) were then evoked by the perception of harmful actions, indicative of fast information processing associated with early stages of moral cognition. Our data strongly support the notion that intentionality is the first input to moral computations. They also demonstrate that emotion acts as a gain antecedent to moral judgment by alerting the individual to the moral salience of a situation and provide evidence for the pervasive role of affect in moral sensitivity and reasoning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22956794     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00473.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  43 in total

1.  When minds matter for moral judgment: intent information is neurally encoded for harmful but not impure acts.

Authors:  Alek Chakroff; James Dungan; Jorie Koster-Hale; Amelia Brown; Rebecca Saxe; Liane Young
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Specific electrophysiological components disentangle affective sharing and empathic concern in psychopathy.

Authors:  Jean Decety; Kimberly L Lewis; Jason M Cowell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Socioemotional processing of morally-laden behavior and their consequences on others in forensic psychopaths.

Authors:  Jean Decety; Chenyi Chen; Carla L Harenski; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Contextual and perceptual brain processes underlying moral cognition: a quantitative meta-analysis of moral reasoning and moral emotions.

Authors:  Gunes Sevinc; R Nathan Spreng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The neural correlates of justified and unjustified killing: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Pascal Molenberghs; Claudette Ogilvie; Winnifred R Louis; Jean Decety; Jessica Bagnall; Paul G Bain
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Spatiotemporal neural dynamics of moral judgment: a high-density ERP study.

Authors:  Keith J Yoder; Jean Decety
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The neuroscience of implicit moral evaluation and its relation to generosity in early childhood.

Authors:  Jason M Cowell; Jean Decety
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Amygdala subnuclei connectivity in response to violence reveals unique influences of individual differences in psychopathic traits in a nonforensic sample.

Authors:  Keith J Yoder; Eric C Porges; Jean Decety
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Friends or Foes: Is Empathy Necessary for Moral Behavior?

Authors:  Jean Decety; Jason M Cowell
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-09

10.  An association between biased impression updating and relationship facilitation: A behavioral and fMRI investigation.

Authors:  BoKyung Park; Liane Young
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.