Literature DB >> 24503959

Contextual and perceptual brain processes underlying moral cognition: a quantitative meta-analysis of moral reasoning and moral emotions.

Gunes Sevinc1, R Nathan Spreng2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Human morality has been investigated using a variety of tasks ranging from judgments of hypothetical dilemmas to viewing morally salient stimuli. These experiments have provided insight into neural correlates of moral judgments and emotions, yet these approaches reveal important differences in moral cognition. Moral reasoning tasks require active deliberation while moral emotion tasks involve the perception of stimuli with moral implications. We examined convergent and divergent brain activity associated with these experimental paradigms taking a quantitative meta-analytic approach. DATA SOURCE: A systematic search of the literature yielded 40 studies. Studies involving explicit decisions in a moral situation were categorized as active (n = 22); studies evoking moral emotions were categorized as passive (n = 18). We conducted a coordinate-based meta-analysis using the Activation Likelihood Estimation to determine reliable patterns of brain activity. RESULTS &
CONCLUSIONS: Results revealed a convergent pattern of reliable brain activity for both task categories in regions of the default network, consistent with the social and contextual information processes supported by this brain network. Active tasks revealed more reliable activity in the temporoparietal junction, angular gyrus and temporal pole. Active tasks demand deliberative reasoning and may disproportionately involve the retrieval of social knowledge from memory, mental state attribution, and construction of the context through associative processes. In contrast, passive tasks reliably engaged regions associated with visual and emotional information processing, including lingual gyrus and the amygdala. A laterality effect was observed in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, with active tasks engaging the left, and passive tasks engaging the right. While overlapping activity patterns suggest a shared neural network for both tasks, differential activity suggests that processing of moral input is affected by task demands. The results provide novel insight into distinct features of moral cognition, including the generation of moral context through associative processes and the perceptual detection of moral salience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24503959      PMCID: PMC3913597          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  58 in total

1.  How (and where) does moral judgment work?

Authors:  Joshua Greene; Jonathan Haidt
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  An fMRI study of intentional and unintentional (embarrassing) violations of social norms.

Authors:  S Berthoz; J L Armony; R J R Blair; R J Dolan
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 3.  Where in the brain is morality? Everywhere and maybe nowhere.

Authors:  Liane Young; James Dungan
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  A distinct role of the temporal-parietal junction in predicting socially guided decisions.

Authors:  R McKell Carter; Daniel L Bowling; Crystal Reeck; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  An FMRI investigation of spontaneous mental state inference for moral judgment.

Authors:  Liane Young; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A functional imaging investigation of moral deliberation and moral intuition.

Authors:  Carla L Harenski; Olga Antonenko; Matthew S Shane; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Moral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain.

Authors:  Jorge Moll; Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  The BrainMap strategy for standardization, sharing, and meta-analysis of neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff; P Mickle Fox; Angela M Uecker; Kimberly L Ray; Juan J Saenz; D Reese McKay; Danilo Bzdok; Robert W Laird; Jennifer L Robinson; Jessica A Turner; Peter E Turkeltaub; Jack L Lancaster; Peter T Fox
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-09-09

9.  What we say and what we do: the relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices.

Authors:  Oriel FeldmanHall; Dean Mobbs; Davy Evans; Lucy Hiscox; Lauren Navrady; Tim Dalgleish
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-03-09

10.  On the Wrong Track: Process and Content in Moral Psychology.

Authors:  Guy Kahane
Journal:  Mind Lang       Date:  2012-10-29
View more
  17 in total

1.  Can beneficial ends justify lying? Neural responses to the passive reception of lies and truth-telling with beneficial and harmful monetary outcomes.

Authors:  Lijun Yin; Bernd Weber
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Beyond consensus: Embracing heterogeneity in curated neuroimaging meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gia H Ngo; Simon B Eickhoff; Minh Nguyen; Gunes Sevinc; Peter T Fox; R Nathan Spreng; B T Thomas Yeo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  An investigation of care-based vs. rule-based morality in frontotemporal dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and healthy controls.

Authors:  Andrew R Carr; Pongsatorn Paholpak; Madelaine Daianu; Sylvia S Fong; Michelle Mather; Elvira E Jimenez; Paul Thompson; Mario F Mendez
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Task-dependent evaluative processing of moral and emotional content during comprehension: An ERP study.

Authors:  Angelika Kunkel; Ruth Filik; Ian Grant Mackenzie; Hartmut Leuthold
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  How does mindfulness training improve moral cognition: a theoretical and experimental framework for the study of embodied ethics.

Authors:  Gunes Sevinc; Sara W Lazar
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-02-22

6.  Cerebellum and Emotion in Morality.

Authors:  Hyemin Han
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  Neural Correlates of Moral Judgment in Criminal Offenders with Sadistic Traits.

Authors:  Fadwa Cazala; Keith A Harenski; David M Thornton; Keith A Kiehl; Carla L Harenski
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-11-06

8.  Symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder as predictors of neurobiology and treatment response.

Authors:  Anders Lillevik Thorsen; Gerd Kvale; Bjarne Hansen; Odile A van den Heuvel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-23

9.  Age differences in intuitive moral decision-making: Associations with inter-network neural connectivity.

Authors:  Shenyang Huang; Leonard Faul; Gunes Sevinc; Laetitia Mwilambwe-Tshilobo; Roni Setton; Amber W Lockrow; Natalie C Ebner; Gary R Turner; R Nathan Spreng; Felipe De Brigard
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2021-09-02

10.  Reduced empathic concern leads to utilitarian moral judgments in trait alexithymia.

Authors:  Indrajeet Patil; Giorgia Silani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.