BACKGROUND: Four health behaviors--smoking, risky drinking, physical inactivity, and unhealthy diets--contribute substantially to health care burden and are common among primary care patients. However, there is insufficient evidence to recommend broadly brief interventions to address all 4 of these in frontline primary care. This study took advantage of a multinetwork initiative to reflect on health behavior outcomes and the challenges of using a common set of measures to assess health behavior-change strategies for multiple health behaviors in routine primary care practice. METHODS: Standardized, brief practical health behavior and quality of life measures used across 7 practice-based research networks (PBRNs) with independent primary care interventions in 54 primary care practices between August 2005 and December 2007 were analyzed. Mixed-effects longitudinal models assessed whether intervention patients improved diet, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, and unhealthy days over time. Separate analyses were conducted for each intervention. RESULTS: Of 4463 adults, 2199 had follow-up data, and all available data were used in longitudinal analyses. Adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, education, and baseline body mass index where available, diet scores improved significantly in 5 of 7 networks (P < .02). Physical activity improved significantly in 2 networks but declined in one network (P < .024). The likelihood of being a current smoker was reduced in 2 of 5 networks (P < .0001), and average alcoholic drinks per day was reduced in 2 networks (P < .02). Participants reported fewer unhealthy days at follow-up in 3 of 7 networks (P < .01). Details of implementation and the limitations in instrumentation help contextualize these modest outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although some patients in these 7 PBRNs improved in several health behaviors and quality of life, the strength of evidence for field-ready methods to address multiple health risk behaviors remains elusive. The use of common measures to assess changes in 4 unhealthy behaviors was achieved practically in PBRNs testing diverse strategies to improve behaviors; however, variations in implementation, instrumentation performance, and some features of study design overwhelmed potential cross-PBRN comparisons. For common measures to be useful for comparisons across practices or PBRNs, greater standardization of study designs and careful attention to practicable implementation strategies are necessary.
BACKGROUND: Four health behaviors--smoking, risky drinking, physical inactivity, and unhealthy diets--contribute substantially to health care burden and are common among primary care patients. However, there is insufficient evidence to recommend broadly brief interventions to address all 4 of these in frontline primary care. This study took advantage of a multinetwork initiative to reflect on health behavior outcomes and the challenges of using a common set of measures to assess health behavior-change strategies for multiple health behaviors in routine primary care practice. METHODS: Standardized, brief practical health behavior and quality of life measures used across 7 practice-based research networks (PBRNs) with independent primary care interventions in 54 primary care practices between August 2005 and December 2007 were analyzed. Mixed-effects longitudinal models assessed whether intervention patients improved diet, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, and unhealthy days over time. Separate analyses were conducted for each intervention. RESULTS: Of 4463 adults, 2199 had follow-up data, and all available data were used in longitudinal analyses. Adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, education, and baseline body mass index where available, diet scores improved significantly in 5 of 7 networks (P < .02). Physical activity improved significantly in 2 networks but declined in one network (P < .024). The likelihood of being a current smoker was reduced in 2 of 5 networks (P < .0001), and average alcoholic drinks per day was reduced in 2 networks (P < .02). Participants reported fewer unhealthy days at follow-up in 3 of 7 networks (P < .01). Details of implementation and the limitations in instrumentation help contextualize these modest outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although some patients in these 7 PBRNs improved in several health behaviors and quality of life, the strength of evidence for field-ready methods to address multiple health risk behaviors remains elusive. The use of common measures to assess changes in 4 unhealthy behaviors was achieved practically in PBRNs testing diverse strategies to improve behaviors; however, variations in implementation, instrumentation performance, and some features of study design overwhelmed potential cross-PBRN comparisons. For common measures to be useful for comparisons across practices or PBRNs, greater standardization of study designs and careful attention to practicable implementation strategies are necessary.
Authors: Robert L Williams; Kurt Stange; William R Phillips; Louise S Acheson; Bijal Balasubramanian; Elizabeth A Bayliss; Robert L Ferrer; James M Gill Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Edurne Zabaleta-Del-Olmo; Marc Casajuana-Closas; Tomàs López-Jiménez; Haizea Pombo; Mariona Pons-Vigués; Enriqueta Pujol-Ribera; Carmen Cabezas-Peña; Joan Llobera; Ruth Martí-Lluch; Caterina Vicens; Emma Motrico; Irene Gómez-Gómez; José-Ángel Maderuelo-Fernández; José I Recio-Rodriguez; Barbara Masluk; Sara Contreras-Martos; Constanza Jacques-Aviñó; Ignacio Aznar-Lou; Montserrat Gil-Girbau; Ana Clavería; Rosa Magallón-Botaya; Juan-Ángel Bellón; Rafel Ramos; Alvaro Sanchez-Perez; Patricia Moreno-Peral; Alfonso Leiva; Clara González-Formoso; Bonaventura Bolíbar Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-12-04 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Hector P Rodriguez; Beth A Glenn; Tanya T Olmos; Alex H Krist; Stephanie L Shimada; Rodger Kessler; Suzanne Heurtin-Roberts; Roshan Bastani Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Vincent Ch Chung; Benjamin Hk Yip; Sian M Griffiths; Ellen Lm Yu; Siya Liu; Robin St Ho; Xinyin Wu; Albert Wn Leung; Regina Ws Sit; Justin Cy Wu; Samuel Ys Wong Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Nadia Minian; Tricia Corrin; Mathangee Lingam; Wayne K deRuiter; Terri Rodak; Valerie H Taylor; Heather Manson; Rosa Dragonetti; Laurie Zawertailo; Osnat C Melamed; Margaret Hahn; Peter Selby Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 3.295