Literature DB >> 34863136

Multiple health behaviour change primary care intervention for smoking cessation, physical activity and healthy diet in adults 45 to 75 years old (EIRA study): a hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomised trial.

Edurne Zabaleta-Del-Olmo1,2,3,4, Marc Casajuana-Closas1,4, Tomàs López-Jiménez1, Haizea Pombo5,6, Mariona Pons-Vigués3,7, Enriqueta Pujol-Ribera1,3,4, Carmen Cabezas-Peña8, Joan Llobera9,10, Ruth Martí-Lluch4,11,12, Caterina Vicens10,13,14, Emma Motrico15, Irene Gómez-Gómez15, José-Ángel Maderuelo-Fernández16,17,18, José I Recio-Rodriguez17,19, Barbara Masluk20,21, Sara Contreras-Martos9,10, Constanza Jacques-Aviñó1,4, Ignacio Aznar-Lou22,23, Montserrat Gil-Girbau22, Ana Clavería24,25, Rosa Magallón-Botaya26,27,28, Juan-Ángel Bellón29,30,31, Rafel Ramos11,12,32, Alvaro Sanchez-Perez33, Patricia Moreno-Peral29, Alfonso Leiva9,10, Clara González-Formoso25,34, Bonaventura Bolíbar1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a) a Multiple Health Behaviour Change (MHBC) intervention on reducing smoking, increasing physical activity and adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern in people aged 45-75 years compared to usual care; and b) an implementation strategy.
METHODS: A cluster randomised effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial-type 2 with two parallel groups was conducted in 25 Spanish Primary Health Care (PHC) centres (3062 participants): 12 centres (1481 participants) were randomised to the intervention and 13 (1581 participants) to the control group (usual care). The intervention was based on the Transtheoretical Model and focused on all target behaviours using individual, group and community approaches. PHC professionals made it during routine care. The implementation strategy was based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Data were analysed using generalised linear mixed models, accounting for clustering. A mixed-methods data analysis was used to evaluate implementation outcomes (adoption, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility and fidelity) and determinants of implementation success.
RESULTS: 14.5% of participants in the intervention group and 8.9% in the usual care group showed a positive change in two or all the target behaviours. Intervention was more effective in promoting dietary behaviour change (31.9% vs 21.4%). The overall adoption rate by professionals was 48.7%. Early and final appropriateness were perceived by professionals as moderate. Early acceptability was high, whereas final acceptability was only moderate. Initial and final acceptability as perceived by the participants was high, and appropriateness moderate. Consent and recruitment rates were 82.0% and 65.5%, respectively, intervention uptake was 89.5% and completion rate 74.7%. The global value of the percentage of approaches with fidelity ≥50% was 16.7%. Eight CFIR constructs distinguished between high and low implementation, five corresponding to the Inner Setting domain.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to usual care, the EIRA intervention was more effective in promoting MHBC and dietary behaviour change. Implementation outcomes were satisfactory except for the fidelity to the planned intervention, which was low. The organisational and structural contexts of the centres proved to be significant determinants of implementation effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03136211 . Registered 2 May 2017, "retrospectively registered".
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health behaviour; Health promotion; Hybrid trial; Implementation science; Mediterranean diet; Physical activity; Primary health care; Smoking cessation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34863136      PMCID: PMC8642878          DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11982-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  55 in total

1.  A Review of Multiple Health Behavior Change Interventions for Primary Prevention.

Authors:  Judith J Prochaska; James O Prochaska
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2011-05

2.  A randomized trial of tailoring and motivational interviewing to promote fruit and vegetable consumption for cancer prevention and control.

Authors:  Marci Kramish Campbell; Carol Carr; Brenda Devellis; Boyd Switzer; Andrea Biddle; M Ahinee Amamoo; Joan Walsh; Bingqing Zhou; Robert Sandler
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2009-10

3.  Beyond the consultation room: Proposals to approach health promotion in primary care according to health-care users, key community informants and primary care centre workers.

Authors:  Anna Berenguera; Mariona Pons-Vigués; Patricia Moreno-Peral; Sebastià March; Joana Ripoll; Maria Rubio-Valera; Haizea Pombo-Ramos; Angela Asensio-Martínez; Eva Bolaños-Gallardo; Catalina Martínez-Carazo; José Ángel Maderuelo-Fernández; Maria Martínez-Andrés; Enriqueta Pujol-Ribera
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement.

Authors:  Hilary Pinnock; Melanie Barwick; Christopher R Carpenter; Sandra Eldridge; Gonzalo Grandes; Chris J Griffiths; Jo Rycroft-Malone; Paul Meissner; Elizabeth Murray; Anita Patel; Aziz Sheikh; Stephanie J C Taylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-03-06

5.  Health-care users, key community informants and primary health care workers' views on health, health promotion, health assets and deficits: qualitative study in seven Spanish regions.

Authors:  Mariona Pons-Vigués; Anna Berenguera; Núria Coma-Auli; Haizea Pombo-Ramos; Sebastià March; Angela Asensio-Martínez; Patricia Moreno-Peral; Sara Mora-Simón; Maria Martínez-Andrés; Enriqueta Pujol-Ribera
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2017-06-13

6.  Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials.

Authors:  Marion K Campbell; Gilda Piaggio; Diana R Elbourne; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-09-04

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a multiple health behaviour change intervention in people aged between 45 and 75 years: a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care (EIRA study).

Authors:  Maria Rubio-Valera; Antoni Serrano-Blanco; Ignacio Aznar-Lou; Edurne Zabaleta-Del-Olmo; Marc Casajuana-Closas; Alba Sánchez-Viñas; Elizabeth Parody-Rúa; Bonaventura Bolíbar; Montserrat Iracheta-Todó; Oana Bulilete; Tomàs López-Jiménez; Haizea Pombo-Ramos; María Victoria Martín Miguel; Rosa Magallón-Botaya; Jose Ángel Maderuelo-Fernández; Emma Motrico; Juan Bellón; Ruth Martí-Lluch
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  Factors influencing the adoption of an innovation: an examination of the uptake of the Canadian Heart Health Kit (HHK).

Authors:  Shannon D Scott; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Nandini Karunamuni; Raphaël Bize; Wendy Rodgers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Combined impact of health behaviours and mortality in men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study.

Authors:  Kay-Tee Khaw; Nicholas Wareham; Sheila Bingham; Ailsa Welch; Robert Luben; Nicholas Day
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of primary prevention and health promotion activities in primary care: a synthesis through meta-ethnography.

Authors:  Maria Rubio-Valera; Mariona Pons-Vigués; María Martínez-Andrés; Patricia Moreno-Peral; Anna Berenguera; Ana Fernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.