Literature DB >> 22955535

Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot: experience with the Mitchell-Ponseti brace.

Lewis E Zionts1, Nathan Frost, Rachel Kim, Edward Ebramzadeh, Sophia N Sangiorgio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Mitchell-Ponseti (MP) foot abduction orthosis was introduced to provide a more user-friendly alternative to the traditional Denis-Browne (DB) brace in the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. We describe our experience with the effectiveness of the MP brace to maintain correction of clubfeet corrected using the Ponseti method.
METHODS: We evaluated 57 consecutive infants with 84 idiopathic clubfeet who were treated using the Ponseti method. After initial correction of the deformity was obtained, all infants were placed in the MP brace.
RESULTS: The patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years (mean, 37.9 mo; range, 24 to 56 mo). Seventy-nine feet (94%) had heel-cord tenotomy or lengthening. The families of 34 (60%) patients were adherent with the postcorrective brace protocol. Skin problems were observed in 8 patients (14%), 6 of which were superficial dorsal skin abrasion, and none of the sandals required customization by an orthotist. A recurrence occurred in 40 feet (48%). Correction was regained with manipulation and cast application in all cases. Nineteen feet (23%) in 14 patients have had, or are scheduled for, an anterior tibial tendon transfer. At latest follow-up, all feet were plantigrade and had at least 10 degrees of dorsiflexion. None of the patients required surgical releases. Of 31 patients followed for at least 3 years, 26 (84%) used the brace for a minimum of 3 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the MP foot abduction orthosis, we were able to achieve compliance rates that were at least comparable with those of earlier reports using the DB brace. Families found the brace easy to use. The MP brace may be considered a useful alternative to the DB brace. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II--prospective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22955535     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182694f4d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  13 in total

Review 1.  The Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital club foot: review of the current literature and treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Christof Radler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Pediatric clubfoot : Treatment of recurrence].

Authors:  C Radler; G T Mindler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Two-year retrospective cohort results on use of a dynamic unilateral brace for treatment of clubfoot: Can compliance and prevention of recurrence both be achieved?

Authors:  Emily J Farrar; Michelle Lo; Luke Groothoff; Jerald Cunningham; Joseph Theuri
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2022-07-03

4.  [Treatment of recurrent clubfoot and residual deformities after congenital clubfoot].

Authors:  B Westhoff; K Weimann-Stahlschmidt; R Krauspe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Walk for life - the National Clubfoot Project of Bangladesh: the four-year outcomes of 150 congenital clubfoot cases following Ponseti method.

Authors:  Angela Margaret Evans; Mohommad Mamun Hossen Chowdhury; Mohommad Humayun Kabir; Md Fashiur Rahman
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Alteration in hypoplasia of the hindfoot structures during early growth in clubfeet treated using the Ponseti method.

Authors:  J J Beck; S N Sangiorgio; M H Jew; T Marcum; S D Cooper; E Ebramzadeh; L E Zionts
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 7.  Ponseti method in the management of clubfoot under 2 years of age: A systematic review.

Authors:  Balasankar Ganesan; Ameersing Luximon; Adel Al-Jumaily; Suchita Kothe Balasankar; Ganesh R Naik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Is unilateral lower leg orthosis with a circular foot unit in the treatment of idiopathic clubfeet a reasonable bracing alternative in the Ponseti method? Five-year results of a supraregional paediatric-orthopaedic centre.

Authors:  N Berger; D Lewens; M Salzmann; A Hapfelmeier; L Döderlein; P M Prodinger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Bracing in clubfoot: do we know enough?

Authors:  C Alves
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

10.  Timing for Ponseti clubfoot management: does the age matter? 90 children (131 feet) with a mean follow-up of 5 years.

Authors:  Yu-Bin Liu; Song-Jian Li; Li Zhao; Bo Yu; Da-Hang Zhao
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.