Literature DB >> 22954455

Indoor air pollutants in office environments: assessment of comfort, health, and performance.

Peder Wolkoff1.   

Abstract

Concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in office environments are generally too low to cause sensory irritation in the eyes and airways on the basis of estimated thresholds for sensory irritation. Furthermore, effects in the lungs, e.g. inflammatory effects, have not been substantiated at indoor relevant concentrations. Some VOCs, including formaldehyde, in combination may under certain environmental and occupational conditions result in reported sensory irritation. The odour thresholds of several VOCs are low enough to influence the perceived air quality that result in a number of acute effects from reported sensory irritation in eyes and airways and deterioration of performance. The odour perception (air quality) depends on a number of factors that may influence the odour impact. There is neither clear indication that office dust particles may cause sensory effects, even not particles spiked with glucans, aldehydes or phthalates, nor lung effects; some inflammatory effects may be observed among asthmatics. Ozone-initiated terpene reaction products may be of concern in ozone-enriched environments (≥0.1mg/m(3)) and elevated limonene concentrations, partly due to the production of formaldehyde. Ambient particles may cause cardio-pulmonary effects, especially in susceptible people (e.g. elderly and sick people); even, short-term effects, e.g. from traffic emission and candle smoke may possibly have modulating and delayed effects on the heart, but otherwise adverse effects in the airways and lung functions have not been observed. Secondary organic aerosols generated in indoor ozone-initiated terpene reactions appear not to cause adverse effects in the airways; rather the gaseous products are relevant. Combined exposure to particles and ozone may evoke effects in subgroups of asthmatics. Based on an analysis of thresholds for odour and sensory irritation selected compounds are recommended for measurements to assess the indoor air quality and to minimize reports of irritation symptoms, deteriorated performance, and cardiovascular and pulmonary effects.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22954455     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  23 in total

1.  Distribution features of biological hazardous pollutants in residential environments in Korea.

Authors:  Cheol Min Lee; Soo Jong Hong; Yoon Shin Kim; Gee Yong Park; Sun Ju Nam Goung; Kyung Hwan Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Infection risk in gyms during physical exercise.

Authors:  Alexandro Andrade; Fábio Hech Dominski; Marcelo Luiz Pereira; Carla Maria de Liz; Giorgio Buonanno
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Occupants' satisfaction toward building environmental quality: structural equation modeling approach.

Authors:  Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman; C O Egbu; Emma Marinie Ahmad Zawawi; Saipol Bari Abd Karim; Chen Jia Woon
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Assessment of environmental and ergonomic hazard associated to printing and photocopying: a review.

Authors:  Abhishek Nandan; N A Siddiqui; Pankaj Kumar
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Indoor air quality (IAQ) assessment in a multistorey shopping mall by high-spatial-resolution monitoring of volatile organic compounds (VOC).

Authors:  M Amodio; P R Dambruoso; Gianluigi de Gennaro; L de Gennaro; A Demarinis Loiotile; A Marzocca; F Stasi; L Trizio; M Tutino
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Exposure to formaldehyde, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and terpenes among office workers and associations with reported symptoms.

Authors:  Bo Glas; Berndt Stenberg; Hans Stenlund; Anna-Lena Sunesson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Particle and volatile organic compound emissions from a 3D printer filament extruder.

Authors:  Peter Byrley; M Ariel Geer Wallace; William K Boyes; Kim Rogers
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  A comprehensive air quality investigation at an aquatic centre: Indoor/outdoor comparisons.

Authors:  Evangelos I Tolis; Giorgos Panaras; John G Bartzis
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Evaluation on exposures to particulate matter at a junior secondary school: a comprehensive study on health risks and effective inflammatory responses in Northwestern China.

Authors:  Hongmei Xu; Benjamin Guinot; Steven Sai Hang Ho; Yaqi Li; Junji Cao; Zhenxing Shen; Xinyi Niu; Zhuohui Zhao; Suixin Liu; Yali Lei; Qian Zhang; Jian Sun
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 4.609

10.  Occupational exposure and health risks of volatile organic compounds of hotel housekeepers: Field measurements of exposure and health risks.

Authors:  Nan Lin; Marie-Anne Rosemberg; Wei Li; Emily Meza-Wilson; Christopher Godwin; Stuart Batterman
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.770

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.