Literature DB >> 25274505

Exposure to formaldehyde, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and terpenes among office workers and associations with reported symptoms.

Bo Glas1, Berndt Stenberg, Hans Stenlund, Anna-Lena Sunesson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare exposure to formaldehyde, nitrogen dioxide, ozone and terpenes among office workers with and without sick building syndrome and the odds ratio for exposure. Are there significant differences?
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study of office workers, we investigated the associations between exposure to formaldehyde, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, α-pinene, and D-limonene using a case-control analysis. Data on perceived general, mucosal, and skin symptoms were obtained by questionnaires. Personal exposure measurements of the compounds were performed among cases and controls, and the odds ratios for exposures to the substances, both singly and in combination, were investigated.
RESULTS: Exposures varied for formaldehyde between 0.23 and 45 µg/m(3), nitrogen dioxide between 0.26 and 110 µg/m(3), ozone between <16 and 165 µg/m(3), α-pinene between 0.2 and 170 µg/m(3), and D-limonene between 0.8 and 1,400 µg/m(3). No consistent differences in exposure odds ratios were found between cases and controls or for individual symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25274505     DOI: 10.1007/s00420-014-0985-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  23 in total

1.  Changes in eye blink frequency as a measure of trigeminal stimulation by exposure to limonene oxidation products, isoprene oxidation products and nitrate radicals.

Authors:  Jacob Klenø; Peder Wolkoff
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  More than obvious: better methods for interpreting nondetect data.

Authors:  Dennis R Helsel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Outdoor ozone and building-related symptoms in the BASE study.

Authors:  M G Apte; I S H Buchanan; M J Mendell
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.770

4.  The context of a study influences the reporting of symptoms.

Authors:  Charlotte Brauer; Sigurd Mikkelsen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Validation of the Willems badge diffusive sampler for nitrogen dioxide determinations in occupational environments.

Authors:  Annika Hagenbjörk-Gustafsson; Roger Lindahl; Jan-Olof Levin; Doris Karlsson
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.616

6.  Formation of strong airway irritants in terpene/ozone mixtures.

Authors:  P Wolkoff; P A Clausen; C K Wilkins; G D Nielsen
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.770

7.  Effect of formaldehyde on the expression of adhesion molecules in nasal microvascular endothelial cells: the role of formaldehyde in the pathogenesis of sick building syndrome.

Authors:  W J Kim; Nobuhisa Terada; T Nomura; R Takahashi; S D Lee; J H Park; A Konno
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.018

8.  Environmental, occupational, and personal factors related to the prevalence of sick building syndrome in the general population.

Authors:  D Norbäck; C Edling
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1991-07

9.  Acute airway effects of ozone-initiated d-limonene chemistry: importance of gaseous products.

Authors:  Peder Wolkoff; Per A Clausen; Kjeld Larsen; Maria Hammer; Søren Thor Larsen; Gunnar D Nielsen
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 10.  Ozone's impact on public health: contributions from indoor exposures to ozone and products of ozone-initiated chemistry.

Authors:  Charles J Weschler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating prevalence and risk factors of building-related symptoms among office workers: Seasonal characteristics of symptoms and psychosocial and physical environmental factors.

Authors:  Kenichi Azuma; Koichi Ikeda; Naoki Kagi; U Yanagi; Haruki Osawa
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.674

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.