Literature DB >> 22954212

Sites of genetic instability in mitosis and cancer.

Anne M Casper1, Danielle M Rosen, Kaveri D Rajula.   

Abstract

Certain chromosomal regions called common fragile sites are prone to difficulty during replication. Many tumors have been shown to contain alterations at fragile sites. Several models have been proposed to explain why these sites are unstable. Here we describe work to investigate models of fragile site instability using a yeast artificial chromosome carrying human DNA from a common fragile site region. In addition, we describe a yeast system to investigate whether repair of breaks at a naturally occurring fragile site in yeast, FS2, involves mitotic recombination between homologous chromosomes, leading to loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Our initial evidence is that repair of yeast fragile site breaks does lead to LOH, suggesting that human fragile site breaks may similarly contribute to LOH in cancer. This work is focused on gaining understanding that may enable us to predict and prevent the situations and environments that promote genetic changes that contribute to tumor progression.
© 2012 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22954212      PMCID: PMC3442947          DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06592.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  32 in total

Review 1.  A continuum model for tumour suppression.

Authors:  Alice H Berger; Alfred G Knudson; Pier Paolo Pandolfi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  FRA3B extends over a broad region and contains a spontaneous HPV16 integration site: direct evidence for the coincidence of viral integration sites and fragile sites.

Authors:  C M Wilke; B K Hall; A Hoge; W Paradee; D I Smith; T W Glover
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Chromosomal translocations in yeast induced by low levels of DNA polymerase a model for chromosome fragile sites.

Authors:  Francene J Lemoine; Natasha P Degtyareva; Kirill Lobachev; Thomas D Petes
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Replication dynamics at common fragile site FRA6E.

Authors:  Elisa Palumbo; Laura Matricardi; Elena Tosoni; Aaron Bensimon; Antonella Russo
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  DNA polymerase alpha inhibition by aphidicolin induces gaps and breaks at common fragile sites in human chromosomes.

Authors:  T W Glover; C Berger; J Coyle; B Echo
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Sgs1 and exo1 redundantly inhibit break-induced replication and de novo telomere addition at broken chromosome ends.

Authors:  John R Lydeard; Zachary Lipkin-Moore; Suvi Jain; Vinay V Eapen; James E Haber
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 7.  Non-random inactivation of large common fragile site genes in different cancers.

Authors:  S McAvoy; S C Ganapathiraju; A L Ducharme-Smith; J R Pritchett; F Kosari; D S Perez; Y Zhu; C D James; D I Smith
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 8.  Chromosome fragile sites.

Authors:  Sandra G Durkin; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 16.830

9.  DNA instability at chromosomal fragile sites in cancer.

Authors:  Laura W Dillon; Allison A Burrow; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.236

10.  Extensive DNA end processing by exo1 and sgs1 inhibits break-induced replication.

Authors:  Vanessa A Marrero; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Molecular characterization of common fragile sites as a strategy to discover cancer susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Larissa Savelyeva; Lena M Brueckner
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Genome-wide high-resolution mapping of chromosome fragile sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Wei Song; Margaret Dominska; Patricia W Greenwell; Thomas D Petes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Break-seq reveals hydroxyurea-induced chromosome fragility as a result of unscheduled conflict between DNA replication and transcription.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hoffman; Andrew McCulley; Brian Haarer; Remigiusz Arnak; Wenyi Feng
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Loss of Ewing sarcoma EWS allele promotes tumorigenesis by inducing chromosomal instability in zebrafish.

Authors:  Hyewon Park; Richard Galbraith; Thaddeus Turner; Justin Mehojah; Mizuki Azuma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.