| Literature DB >> 22954171 |
Jing Lu1, Yu-yu Yao, Qi-ming Dai, Gen-shan Ma, Shu-feng Zhang, Lei Cao, Li-qun Ren, Nai-feng Liu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies revealed that erythropoietin (EPO) has tissue-protective effects in the heart by increasing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and attenuating myocardial fibrosis in ischemia models. In this study, we investigated the effect of EPO on ventricular remodeling and blood vessel growth in diabetic rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22954171 PMCID: PMC3527329 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
General characteristics of the animal model (mean ± SEM)
| LVD d (mm) | 6.62 ± 0.36 | 7.48 ± 0.72* | 6.78 ± 0.53▴ |
| LVD s (mm) | 3.57 ± 0.58 | 4.65 ± 0.74* | 3.67 ± 0.65▴ |
| EF (%) | 79.4 ± 8.12 | 65.7 ± 5.49# | 75.6 ± 4.87▴ |
| Body weight (g) baseline | 236 ± 7.9 | 241 ± 6.7 | 239 ± 8.8 |
| Body weight (g) end-point | 358 ± 13.8 | 293 ± 13.5# | 332 ± 15.4▴ |
| Heart rate (BPM) | 411.8 ± 46.8 | 416.6 ± 67.2 | 376.9 ± 43.0 |
| HW/BW (mg/g) | 3.1 ± 0.14 | 4.5 ± 0.20# | 3.3 ± 0.18▴ |
| Blood glucose (mmol/L) baseline | 4.55 ± 0.60 | 20.47 ± 1.46# | 20.63 ± 1.62# |
| Blood glucose (mmol/L) end-point | 4.13 ± 0.43 | 20.27 ± 1.20# | 21.37 ± 1.53# |
| Erythrocyte numbers (1012/L) baseline | 8.00 ± 0.43 | 7.84 ± 0.40 | 8.06 ± 0.23 |
| Erythrocyte numbers (1012/L) end-point | 8.16 ± 0.37 | 7.68 ± 0.34 | 8.23 ± 0.47 |
*P < 0.05 vs control, #P <0.01 vs control, ▴P <0.05 vs diabetes.
Figure 1EPO administration increased the number of CD34Flk-1 progenitors in diabetic rats. (A) Representative histograms of Control rats, DM rats, and EPO rats. (B): Tabulated data. #P <0.01 vs control, ▵P <0.01 vs diabetes.
Figure 2EPO administration increased angiogenesis in diabetic rats and was dependent on VEGF and EPOR up-regulation. (A) Representative micrographs of heart sections stained with antibodies against CD31, EPOR and VEGF (400x magnification). (B) Capillary density in number of capillaries per mm2. Quantitative data showed EPOR and VEGF staining. (C) Representative western blots of myocardial VEGF and EPOR levels. (D) Real-time PCR analysis of VEGF and EPOR mRNA levels. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 5). *P < 0.05 vs control, #P <0.01 vs control, ▴P <0.05 vs diabetes, ▵P <0.01 vs diabetes.
Figure 3EPO inhibited myocardial fibrosis and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in diabetic rats and was dependent on the reduction of TGF-β expression. (A) Picrosirius Red staining showing the collagen content in LV sections from control, diabetic, and diabetic EPO–treated rats. The arrowhead indicates elevated collagen content that was stained red in the extracellular matrix in the LV myocardium of diabetic rats and is significantly higher than control and EPO–treated group (200×magnification). (B) Collagen content was quantified from Picrosirius Red staining using Adobe Photoshop. (C) Immunohistochemical staining of TGF-β: quantitative data of TGF-β staining (400× magnification). (D) Immunohistochemical staining of collagen type I: quantitative data of collagen type I staining (400× magnification). (E) Immunohistochemical staining of collagen type III: quantitative data of collagen type III staining (400× magnification). (F) Caridomyocyte size was measured by hematoxylin-eosin staining in cross-sectional areas. (400× magnification). Bar graph shows quantitative analysis of cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 5).*P < 0.05 vs control, #P <0.01 vs control, ▴P <0.05 vs diabetes, ▵P <0.01 vs diabetes.