Literature DB >> 22954077

Diversity in the scope and practice of hospital-based midwives in the Netherlands.

Doug Cronie1, Marlies Rijnders, Simone Buitendijk.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Not all midwives in the Netherlands are independent practitioners. One in 4 midwives registered to practice is employed in the hospital setting, where 67% of all births occur. There has not yet been an in-depth examination of hospital-based midwives' practice in the Netherlands, in the context of care in a higher-risk environment. The primary aims of this study were to describe the diversity and scope of practice of hospital-based midwives in the Netherlands.
METHODS: This was an online survey of all hospitals throughout the Netherlands with labor/birthing rooms and employing hospital-based midwives. The survey covered 5 topic areas: demographic/organizational details, duties, responsibilities, experience/additional qualifications, and how the midwife functioned within the multidisciplinary hospital team. Descriptive statistics are provided.
RESULTS: A total of 59 secondary and tertiary level hospitals from a possible total of 98 were included for analysis (60% national response rate). Forty percent of all births occurring during the study period were managed solely by a hospital midwife. The provision of midwifery care in the hospital setting was not universal, and where present, hospital-based midwives were not necessarily available 24 hours a day or 7 days a week. Hospital-based midwives reported a high level of autonomy. DISCUSSION: Currently there is no universal provision of midwifery care in the hospital setting in the Netherlands. Where there are hospital-based midwives, they appear to manage the majority of births. However, there are no nationally agreed-upon standards for midwifery practice in the hospital setting, and no agreement exists over minimum requirements relating to additional education for midwives in these settings. A national evaluation and setting of minimum standards is needed.
© 2012 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22954077     DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00164.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  10 in total

1.  Continuity of care: what matters to women when they are referred from primary to secondary care during labour? a qualitative interview study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Ank de Jonge; Rosan Stuijt; Iva Eijke; Marjan J Westerman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Interprofessional collaboration among care professionals in obstetrical care: are perceptions aligned?

Authors:  Anita Romijn; Pim W Teunissen; Martine C de Bruijne; Cordula Wagner; Christianne J M de Groot
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  Creating an Optimality Index - Netherlands: a validation study.

Authors:  Suzanne M Thompson; Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze; Luc Budé; Raymond de Vries; Lisa Kane Low
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Netherlands: a comparison between a nationwide survey in midwifery practices and extrapolation-model.

Authors:  Ramin Kawous; Maria E T C van den Muijsenbergh; Diana Geraci; Kyra R M Hendriks; Livia E Ortensi; Femke Hilverda; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  How good is collaboration between maternity service providers in the Netherlands?

Authors:  Doug Cronie; Marlies Rijnders; Suze Jans; Corine J Verhoeven; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2018-12-24

6.  Are midwives in the Netherlands satisfied with their jobs? A systematic examination of satisfaction levels among hospital and primary-care midwives in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Doug Cronie; Hilde Perdok; Corine Verhoeven; Suze Jans; Marieke Hermus; Raymond de Vries; Marlies Rijnders
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Measure to improve: Is there a patient-acuity measurement tool suitable for use in maternity service provision in the Netherlands? A systematic review.

Authors:  Doug J Cronie; Ageeth Rosman; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-11

8.  Opinions of maternity care professionals and other stakeholders about integration of maternity care: a qualitative study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Hilde Perdok; Suze Jans; Corine Verhoeven; Lidewij Henneman; Therese Wiegers; Ben Willem Mol; François Schellevis; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Detailed registration of care in midwifery practices in the Netherlands: an opportunity for research within a healthy pregnant population.

Authors:  A Pouwels; P Offerhaus; A Merkx; B Zeegers; M J Nieuwenhuijze
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Through the professional's eyes: transfers of care during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period.

Authors:  Cherelle M V van Stenus; Max B Poorthuis; Magda M Boere-Boonekamp; Ariana Need
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.