Literature DB >> 22954074

Prevalence of low vitamin D levels in an urban midwestern obstetric practice.

Catherine Collins-Fulea1, Katherine Klima, Ganesa Rebecca Wegienka.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study describes the prevalence of low vitamin D levels in pregnancy in a diverse urban population.
METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 2839 women who gave birth at a Michigan hospital between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009 and had at least 1 vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]) measurement during their pregnancies. Race/ethnic group, wearing the hijab, and season of 25(OH)D sample collection were used in the descriptive analysis.
RESULTS: Most women (92.5%) in this study had documented insufficient levels of 25(OH)D (defined as < 30 mL), and 71.7% of all women had deficient levels of 25(OH)D (defined as < 20 ng/mL). Subgroups with the highest percentage of women who were vitamin D deficient were: Middle Eastern (91.8%), African American (81.6%), and Asian (74.3%). Overall, women who wore the hijab were more likely to be deficient (89.5% vs 68.7; P < .0001) and insufficient (98.8% vs 91.4%; P < .0001) compared with women who did not wear the hijab. DISCUSSION: The data demonstrate the high rate of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in this white and nonwhite urban population in which samples were collected in both winter and nonwinter months. The percentage of woman who had 25(OH)D levels below 30 ng/mL was significantly higher than that reported in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III) (92.5% compared to 69%), although NHANES did not sample women in northern climates in the winter months. Even using new diagnostic definitions for vitamin D deficiency from the Institute of Medicine, the proportion of women with vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency was 40% and 31.6%, respectively. Clinicians caring for women in northern climates as well as women who are Middle Eastern, African American, and Asian need to be aware of the risk for vitamin D deficiency and the potential health effects for the mother and infant.
© 2012 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22954074     DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00167.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  6 in total

1.  Maternal vitamin D status and infant anthropometry in a US multi-centre cohort study.

Authors:  Cara L Eckhardt; Alison D Gernand; Daniel E Roth; Lisa M Bodnar
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 1.533

Review 2.  Maternal-fetal impact of vitamin D deficiency: a critical review.

Authors:  Letícia Schwerz Weinert; Sandra Pinho Silveiro
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-01

3.  Neighborhood disorder predicts lower serum vitamin D levels in pregnant African American women: A pilot study.

Authors:  J Woo; M D Koenig; C G Engeland; M A Kominiarek; R White-Traut; P Yeatts; C Giurgescu
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.292

4.  Early pregnancy vitamin D status and risk for adverse maternal and infant outcomes in a bi-ethnic cohort: the Behaviors Affecting Baby and You (B.A.B.Y.) Study.

Authors:  Carrie J Nobles; Glenn Markenson; Lisa Chasan-Taber
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  Vitamin D levels in maternal serum and umbilical cord blood in a multi-ethnic population in Antwerp, Belgium.

Authors:  Y Jacquemyn; M Ajaji; N Karepouan
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2013

6.  Vitamin D level and its determinants among Sudanese Women: Does it matter in a sunshine African Country?

Authors:  Nazik Elmalaika Husain; Ahmed Abdel Badie Suliman; Ismail Abdelrahman; Shahinaz A Bedri; Rasha M Musa; Hind E Osman; Ayda H Mustafa; Nahla Gafer; Ehab Farah; Ali Abdel Satir; Mohamed H Ahmed; Mugtaba Osman; Atif A Khalil; Abbas Agaimy
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.