Literature DB >> 22951984

Induction of autophagy does not alter the anti-tumor effects of HDAC inhibitors.

A Newbold, S J Vervoort, B P Martin, M Bots, R W Johnstone.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22951984      PMCID: PMC3461364          DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2012.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Death Dis            Impact factor:   8.469


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, HDAC inhibitors (HDACis) can suppress the growth and/or survival of tumor cells and thus far two HDACis, vorinostat and romidepsin, have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of hematological malignancies.[1] Vorinostat is a potent HDACi that mediates tumor cell-selective apoptosis and we and others have previously shown that the induction of apoptosis correlates with therapeutic efficacy in mouse models of hematological cancer.[2, 3, 4, 5] Although apoptosis may be the preferred mode of HDACi-induced cell death, it is clear that in tumor cells with nonfunctional apoptotic cascades, HDACi are capable of inducing a caspase-independent form of cell death.[5, 6, 7] We recently demonstrated that Eμ-myc lymphomas devoid of Apaf-1 displayed a delayed cell death in response to HDACi treatment, and loss of Apaf-1 failed to affect therapeutic efficacy.[5] The delayed HDACi-induced cell death was concomitant with biochemical and morphological changes characteristic of autophagy.[5] Herein we utilized the genetically tractable Eμ-myc mouse model to address conflicting reports in the field regarding the importance of autophagy in regulating the anti-tumor responses of HDACi.[6, 7, 8] To determine whether autophagy had any role in regulating the response of Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− cells to HDACi, we knocked down the expression of two key autophagy proteins (Atg5 and Atg7) using constitutive short-hairpin RNAs (shRNAs). We developed two distinct shRNAs against Atg5 and one shRNA against Atg7 that efficiently silenced the expression of Atg5 and Atg7, respectively (Figure 1a). To determine if knockdown of Atg5 or Atg7 impaired HDACi-mediated autophagy, we treated Atg5- and Atg7-shRNA-expressing Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− lymphomas with vorinostat and determined the ratio of LC3-I/LC3-II by western blot. In Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− cells with decreased expression of Atg5 or Atg7, vorinostat-induced processing of LC3-I to LC3-II was greatly reduced (Figure 1a).
Figure 1

Vorinostat does not require a functional autophagic pathway to induce tumor cell death in Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− lymphomas. (a) Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− lymphomas were retrovirally transduced with constructs expressing shRNAs targeting Atg5 (clone 1472 and 1389, respectively), Atg7 (clone 698) or a scrambled control. Knockdown efficiency was tested via western blot using antibodies specific for Atg5 and Atg7 (Cell Signaling Technologies, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA, no. 2630 and 2631). Anti-β-actin was used as a loading control. Results are a representative of at least three separate westerns. Atg5-shRNA-expressing Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− (1389 and 1472), Atg7-shRNA-expressing Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− (698) and control-shRNA-expressing Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− lymphomas were treated with 1 μM vorinostat (V) or DMSO (D) for 24 h and LC3 processing was determined by western blot using antibody specific for LC3 (NanoTools Antikoerpertechnik GmbH & Co. KG., Teningen, Germany, no. 0260-100/LC3-2G6). Anti-p44/42 ERK (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA, no. 9107) or anti-β-actin were used as loading controls. Quantitative western analysis was performed using ImageJ software (public domain software by Wayne Rasband), National Institute of Health, USA. Results are representative of at least three separate westerns. (b) Eμ-myc, Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− and Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− lymphomas expressing the various shRNA constructs were treated with increasing concentrations of vorinostat for 24 and 48 h. Cell viability was assessed by annexin V/propidium iodide staining and error bars indicate ±S.E.M. of at least three independent experiments. (c) C57Bl/6 mice bearing Atg5-shRNA-expressing Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− (1389), Atg7-shRNA-expressing Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− (698) or control-shRNA-expressing Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− lymphomas were treated with one dose of vorinostat (200 mg/kg). Spleen and lymph nodes were harvested at the indicated time points (h) following HDACi treatment and the percentage of lymphoma cells in lymph nodes was determined using flow cytometry in the presence of propidium iodide. Each time point is representative of 2–3 mice

We next evaluated the response of Atg5- and Atg7-shRNA-expressing Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− lymphomas to increasing concentrations of vorinostat over time. Consistent with our previous results,[5] a delay in the kinetics of cell death was observed in vorinostat-treated Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− compared with Eμ-myc lymphomas (Figure 1b). However, depletion of Atg5 or Atg7 did not affect vorinostat-mediated tumor cell death, indicating that inhibition of autophagy neither protected Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− cells from HDACi-mediated cell death nor potentiated its anticancer effect. To evaluate the response of Atg5- and Atg7-shRNA-expressing Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− lymphomas to vorinostat in vivo, we transplanted lymphomas into recipient mice and treated tumor-bearing mice with vorinostat. Consistent with our in vitro data, Atg5- and Atg7-shRNA-expressing lymphomas were equally responsive to vorinostat and cleared with similar kinetics as control-shRNA-expressing lymphomas (Figure 1c). Finally, we determined whether inhibition of autophagy had any effect on the therapeutic efficacy of vorinostat in Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− lymphomas. We observed an enhanced survival in mice bearing Atg5-shRNA Eμ-myc/Apaf-1−/− lymphomas after treatment with vorinostat (median survival vorinostat: 43.5 days, median survival vehicle: 25 days, P<0.0084), which was similar to the therapeutic response seen with control-shRNA-expressing lymphomas (median survival vorinostat: 48 days compared with vehicle: 23.5 days, P<0.0001). In conclusion, our data demonstrate that there is no evidence supporting an essential role for autophagy in regulating the response of apoptosis-deficient tumors to HDACi. Recent data suggest that in tumor cells with apoptotic defects, inhibition of autophagy may potentiate the therapeutic response mediated by HDACi.[7] In contrast, we provide evidence that combining autophagy inhibitors with HDACi may not be clinically beneficial in lymphomas with apoptotic defects.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Anticancer activities of histone deacetylase inhibitors.

Authors:  Jessica E Bolden; Melissa J Peart; Ricky W Johnstone
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Tumor-selective action of HDAC inhibitors involves TRAIL induction in acute myeloid leukemia cells.

Authors:  Angela Nebbioso; Nicole Clarke; Emilie Voltz; Emmanuelle Germain; Concetta Ambrosino; Paola Bontempo; Rosana Alvarez; Ettore M Schiavone; Felicetto Ferrara; Francesco Bresciani; Alessandro Weisz; Angel R de Lera; Hinrich Gronemeyer; Lucia Altucci
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2004-12-26       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Characterisation of the novel apoptotic and therapeutic activities of the histone deacetylase inhibitor romidepsin.

Authors:  Andrea Newbold; Ralph K Lindemann; Leonie A Cluse; Kate F Whitecross; Anthony E Dear; Ricky W Johnstone
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  Apoptotic and autophagic cell death induced by histone deacetylase inhibitors.

Authors:  Yufang Shao; Zhonghua Gao; Paul A Marks; Xuejun Jiang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Autophagy potentiates the anti-cancer effects of the histone deacetylase inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuan-Ling Liu; Pei-Ming Yang; Chia-Tung Shun; Ming-Shiang Wu; Jing-Ru Weng; Ching-Chow Chen
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 16.016

6.  Role of autophagy in histone deacetylase inhibitor-induced apoptotic and nonapoptotic cell death.

Authors:  Noor Gammoh; Du Lam; Cindy Puente; Ian Ganley; Paul A Marks; Xuejun Jiang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Analysis of the apoptotic and therapeutic activities of histone deacetylase inhibitors by using a mouse model of B cell lymphoma.

Authors:  R K Lindemann; A Newbold; K F Whitecross; L A Cluse; A J Frew; L Ellis; S Williams; A P Wiegmans; A E Dear; C L Scott; M Pellegrini; A Wei; V M Richon; Paul A Marks; S W Lowe; M J Smyth; R W Johnstone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The histone deacetylase inhibitors LAQ824 and LBH589 do not require death receptor signaling or a functional apoptosome to mediate tumor cell death or therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  Leigh Ellis; Michael Bots; Ralph K Lindemann; Jessica E Bolden; Andrea Newbold; Leonie A Cluse; Clare L Scott; Andreas Strasser; Peter Atadja; Scott W Lowe; Ricky W Johnstone
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 22.113

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  p73 regulates autophagy and hepatocellular lipid metabolism through a transcriptional activation of the ATG5 gene.

Authors:  Z He; H Liu; M Agostini; S Yousefi; A Perren; M P Tschan; T W Mak; G Melino; H U Simon
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 2.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors and cell death.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Qing Zhong
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Rapamycin regulates biochemical metabolites.

Authors:  Paola Tucci; Giovanni Porta; Massimiliano Agostini; Alexey Antonov; Alexander Vasilievich Garabadgiu; Gerry Melino; Anne E Willis
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  p63 regulates glutaminase 2 expression.

Authors:  Arianna Giacobbe; Lucilla Bongiorno-Borbone; Francesca Bernassola; Alessandro Terrinoni; Elke Katrin Markert; Arnold J Levine; Zhaohui Feng; Massimilano Agostini; Lello Zolla; Alessandro Finazzi Agrò; Daniel A Notterman; Gerry Melino; Angelo Peschiaroli
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Metabolic profiling of human CD4+ cells following treatment with methotrexate and anti-TNF-α infliximab.

Authors:  Maria Sole Chimenti; Paola Tucci; Eleonora Candi; Roberto Perricone; Gerry Melino; Anne E Willis
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Phospholipid synthesis fueled by lipid droplets drives the structural development of poliovirus replication organelles.

Authors:  Ekaterina G Viktorova; Jules A Nchoutmboube; Lauren A Ford-Siltz; Ethan Iverson; George A Belov
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 6.823

Review 7.  Epigenetic Control of Autophagy in Cancer Cells: A Key Process for Cancer-Related Phenotypes.

Authors:  Paul Peixoto; Céline Grandvallet; Jean-Paul Feugeas; Michaël Guittaut; Eric Hervouet
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 6.600

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.