BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 testing in patients with operable breast cancer is aimed at identifying candidates for adjuvant anti-HER-2 treatment. However, commonly defined "HER-2(-)" tumors express variable levels of the HER-2 protein, which can influence prognosis. We compared the clinical outcomes of operable breast cancer patients stratified according to a common HER-2 testing algorithm. METHODS: We studied 1,150 women (median age, 58 years; range, 22-94 years) undergoing surgery for early breast cancer at our institution. HER-2 status was determined using the HercepTest™ (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and, when needed, by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Patients receiving adjuvant trastuzumab were excluded. The impact of HER-2 status on the disease-free survival (DFS) time was studied using multivariate Cox proportional regression analysis. RESULTS: Four hundred-fifty seven (40%), 454 (39%), 116 (10%), and 123 (11%) patients were considered HER-2 0+, HER-2 1+, HER-2 2+/HER-2(-) by FISH, and HER-2(+) (3+ or HER-2(+) by FISH), respectively. Compared with a HER-2 0 or 1+ status, a HER-2 2+/HER-2(-) by FISH status was associated with a worse DFS outcome on multivariate analysis. Compared with a HER-2(+) status, a HER-2 2+/HER-2(-) status showed a time-dependent effect on the DFS probability, with an initial advantage that worsened every year by a factor of 1.649. CONCLUSION: A HER-2 2+/HER-2(-) status is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with operable breast cancer. Because of suggestions from randomized trials that the benefits of adjuvant trastuzumab may not be limited to patients with HER-2(+) tumors, patients with a HER-2 2+/HER-2(-) status are ideal candidates for studies testing this hypothesis.
BACKGROUND:Humanepidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 testing in patients with operable breast cancer is aimed at identifying candidates for adjuvant anti-HER-2 treatment. However, commonly defined "HER-2(-)" tumors express variable levels of the HER-2 protein, which can influence prognosis. We compared the clinical outcomes of operable breast cancerpatients stratified according to a common HER-2 testing algorithm. METHODS: We studied 1,150 women (median age, 58 years; range, 22-94 years) undergoing surgery for early breast cancer at our institution. HER-2 status was determined using the HercepTest™ (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and, when needed, by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Patients receiving adjuvant trastuzumab were excluded. The impact of HER-2 status on the disease-free survival (DFS) time was studied using multivariate Cox proportional regression analysis. RESULTS: Four hundred-fifty seven (40%), 454 (39%), 116 (10%), and 123 (11%) patients were considered HER-2 0+, HER-2 1+, HER-2 2+/HER-2(-) by FISH, and HER-2(+) (3+ or HER-2(+) by FISH), respectively. Compared with a HER-2 0 or 1+ status, a HER-2 2+/HER-2(-) by FISH status was associated with a worse DFS outcome on multivariate analysis. Compared with a HER-2(+) status, a HER-2 2+/HER-2(-) status showed a time-dependent effect on the DFS probability, with an initial advantage that worsened every year by a factor of 1.649. CONCLUSION: A HER-2 2+/HER-2(-) status is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with operable breast cancer. Because of suggestions from randomized trials that the benefits of adjuvant trastuzumab may not be limited to patients with HER-2(+) tumors, patients with a HER-2 2+/HER-2(-) status are ideal candidates for studies testing this hypothesis.
Authors: M F Press; L Bernstein; P A Thomas; L F Meisner; J Y Zhou; Y Ma; G Hung; R A Robinson; C Harris; A El-Naggar; D J Slamon; R N Phillips; J S Ross; S R Wolman; K J Flom Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D J Slamon; W Godolphin; L A Jones; J A Holt; S G Wong; D E Keith; W J Levin; S G Stuart; J Udove; A Ullrich Journal: Science Date: 1989-05-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sarah Minner; Birte Jessen; Lars Stiedenroth; Eike Burandt; Jens Köllermann; Martina Mirlacher; Andreas Erbersdobler; Christian Eichelberg; Margit Fisch; Tim Henrik Brümmendorf; Carsten Bokemeyer; Ronald Simon; Thomas Steuber; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Guido Sauter; Thorsten Schlomm Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein Journal: Nature Date: 2000-08-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Dennis Slamon; Wolfgang Eiermann; Nicholas Robert; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Miguel Martin; Michael Press; John Mackey; John Glaspy; Arlene Chan; Marek Pawlicki; Tamas Pinter; Vicente Valero; Mei-Ching Liu; Guido Sauter; Gunter von Minckwitz; Frances Visco; Valerie Bee; Marc Buyse; Belguendouz Bendahmane; Isabelle Tabah-Fisch; Mary-Ann Lindsay; Alessandro Riva; John Crown Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-10-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Edith A Perez; Monica M Reinholz; David W Hillman; Kathleen S Tenner; Matthew J Schroeder; Nancy E Davidson; Silvana Martino; George W Sledge; Lyndsay N Harris; Julie R Gralow; Amylou C Dueck; Rhett P Ketterling; James N Ingle; Wilma L Lingle; Peter A Kaufman; Daniel W Visscher; Robert B Jenkins Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-08-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D A Berry; H B Muss; A D Thor; L Dressler; E T Liu; G Broadwater; D R Budman; I C Henderson; M Barcos; D Hayes; L Norton Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-10-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jeffrey S Ross; Jonathan A Fletcher; Gerald P Linette; James Stec; Edward Clark; Mark Ayers; W Fraser Symmans; Lajos Pusztai; Kenneth J Bloom Journal: Oncologist Date: 2003
Authors: Michael Z Gilcrease; Wendy A Woodward; Marlo M Nicolas; Lynda J Corley; Gregory N Fuller; Francisco J Esteva; Susan L Tucker; Thomas A Buchholz Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: George Douganiotis; Loukas Kontovinis; Efrosini Markopoulou; Alexandra Ainali; Thomas Zarampoukas; Ioannis Natsiopoulos; Konstantinos Papazisis Journal: Cancer Diagn Progn Date: 2022-05-03
Authors: George Douganiotis; George Kesisis; Efthalia Lalla; Ippokratis Korantzis; Ioannis Boukovinas; Konstantinos Papazisis Journal: Cancer Diagn Progn Date: 2022-09-03
Authors: B Rovati; S Mariucci; S Delfanti; D Grasso; C Tinelli; C Torre; M De Amici; P Pedrazzoli Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 6.730
Authors: M E Menezes; S K Das; I Minn; L Emdad; X-Y Wang; D Sarkar; M G Pomper; P B Fisher Journal: Adv Cancer Res Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 6.242