| Literature DB >> 22950026 |
Federico Baltar, Markus V Lindh, Arkadi Parparov, Tom Berman, Jarone Pinhassi.
Abstract
Despite the importance of incubation assays for studies in microbial ecology that frequently require long confinement times, few reports are available in which changes in the assemblage structure of aquatic prokaryotes were monitored during long-term incubations. We measured rates of dissolved organic carbon degradation and microbial respiration by consumption of dissolved oxygen (DO) in four experiments with Lake Kinneret near-surface water and, concomitantly, we analyzed the variability in prokaryotic community structure during long-term dark bottle incubations. During the first 24 h, there were only minor changes in bacterial community composition. Thereafter there were marked changes in the prokaryotic community structure during the incubations. In contrast, oxygen consumption rates (a proxy for both respiration and dissolved organic carbon degradation rates) remained stable for up to 10-23 days. This study is one of the first to examine closely the phylo-genetic changes that occur in the microbial community of untreated freshwater during long-term (days) incubations in dark, sealed containers. Novel information on the diversity of the main bacterial phylotypes that may be involved in dissolved organic matter degradation in lake Kinneret is also provided. Our results suggest that, under certain ecological settings, constant community metabolic rates can be maintained as a result of shifts in community composition.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterioplankton; biological oxygen demand; community composition; incubation; respiration
Year: 2012 PMID: 22950026 PMCID: PMC3426415 DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.25
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiologyopen ISSN: 2045-8827 Impact factor: 3.139
Summary of the experiments performed, including the dates, temperature (Temperature; °C), chlorophyll concentration (Chl; μg/L), incubation days, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration, daily community respiration (CR) measured in situ over 24 h on Day 0, or as daily average over long-term incubations, and significance (P-value) of the linear and exponential regression models. eCR, CR calculated from the exponential fit equation. Note that in Experiment 4, the last day was not included in the calculation of CRfin (see main text for details)
| Experiment | Date | Temperature | Chl | Incubation days | DOC (mg/L) | CR24 | CRfin | eCR24 | eCRfin | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27 November 2003 | 23.5 | 6.8 | 23 | 3.42 | 0.090 | 0.091 | 0.100 | 0.090 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| 2 | 14 March 2004 | 17.1 | 73.2 | 8 | 5.77 | 0.759 | 0.441 | 0.501 | 0.430 | 0.0010 | 0.0024 |
| 3 | 22 June 2004 | 25.5 | 16.5 | 12 | 4.80 | 0.401 | 0.461 | 0.210 | 0.182 | 0.0069 | 0.0043 |
| 4 | 24 October 2004 | 26.7 | 9.0 | 16 | 4.88 | 0.183 | 0.181 | 0.152 | 0.140 | 0.0018 | 0.0014 |
Based on 24-h incubations on Day 0.
Calculated as: (DOLast Day– DODay0)/days incubation.
Dense Peridinium bloom.
Figure 1Decrease in oxygen concentration (mg O2 L−1) during four different experiments. A linear regression model was applied to each of the experiments and the equations added to the plot. Standard deviations are not visible since they are smaller than the symbols.
Figure 2DGGE fingerprints of bacterial assemblages visualized by DGGE of PCR-amplified partial 16S rRNA genes from the initial time zero samples of the four experiments (A), during experiments 1 and 2 (B), and 3 and 4 (C).
Figure 3Dendrogram obtained by analysis of the DGGE fingerprints by Euclidean distances comparing the initial samples from the four experiments (A), and during experiment 1 (B), experiment 2 (C), experiment 3 (D), and experiment 4 (E). Note that one sample taken in the same sampling station but two days before starting the experiment 1 (B) is also included (t = –2).
Figure 4Phylogenetic tree depicting relationships among partial 16S rRNA gene sequences of bacterial phylotypes detected during the four experiments (shown in letters according to Table 2) compared to type species of representative genera in the different phylums. Scale bar depicts 0.1 substitution per nucleotide position. Fibr., Fibrobacteres; Act., Actinobacteria; CFB, Bacteroidetes.
Phylogenetic affiliation of 16S rRNA gene sequences from excised DGGE bands obtained during the incubation experiments. For each phylotype, closest relative GenBank and closes cultured relative are shown together with the sequence similarity (%) and accession number
| Band | Closest cultured relative in Genbank | Percentage | Accession no. | Closest relative in GenBank | Percentage | Accession no. | Class | Phylum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | 91 | FM995613.1 | Uncultured bacterium clone THBP.0912.68 | 99 | HQ905025.1 | Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | |
| g | 81 | AB490809.1 | Uncultured | 99 | GU323642.1 | Fibrobacteres | Fibrobacteres | |
| l | 81 | AY725424.1 | Uncultured bacterium clone WR124 | 100 | HM208490.1 | Fibrobacteres | Fibrobacteres | |
| b | 85 | AF069496.1 | Uncultured SAR11 cluster alphaproteobact clone YL221 | 100 | HM856580.1 | Alphaproteobacteria | Proteobacteria | |
| o | 84 | NR_026304.1 | Uncultured | 86 | AM934758.1 | Alphaproteobacteria | Proteobacteria | |
| p | 81 | NR_025082.1 | Uncultured SAR11 cluster alphaproteobact clone YL221 | 97 | HM856580.1 | Alphaproteobacteria | Proteobacteria | |
| m | 90 | FJ267649.1 | Uncultured proteobacterium clone 2G65 | 92 | GU074082.1 | Betaproteobacteria | Proteobacteria | |
| n | 93 | NR_025455.1 | Uncultured bacterium clone KZNMV-30-B39 | 99 | FJ712609.1 | Betaproteobacteria | Proteobacteria | |
| u | 94 | AM489500.1 | Uncultured proteobacterium clone 2K44 | 100 | GU074239.1 | Betaproteobacteria | Proteobacteria | |
| a | 90 | FJ424814.1 | Uncultured bacterium | 99 | FM201105.1 | Flavobacteriia | Bacteroidetes | |
| e | 92 | AF493694.2 | Uncultured | 99 | HM486207.1 | Flavobacteriia | Bacteroidetes | |
| q | 99 | FN674441.1 | 99 | AB581571.1 | Flavobacteriia | Bacteroidetes | ||
| r | 88 | FN674441.1 | Uncultured | 98 | FJ828083.1 | Flavobacteriia | Bacteroidetes | |
| i | 82 | AB125062.1 | Uncultured bacterium clone DP7.4.20 | 87 | FJ612274.1 | Bacteroidetes | ||
| k | 87 | AB125062.1 | Unidentified bacterium clone K2–30-6 | 96 | AY344418.1 | Flavobacteriia | Bacteroidetes | |
| v | 89 | AB125062.1 | Uncultured bacterium | 99 | AB231428.1 | Flavobacteriia | Bacteroidetes | |
| c | 99 | NR_029000.1 | 99 | HM357635.1 | Cytophagia | Bacteroidetes | ||
| f | 84 | EU595360.1 | Uncultured | 94 | GU074246.1 | Bacteroidetes | ||
| h | 91 | AY904352.2 | Uncultured | 93 | HQ111160.1 | Cytophagia | Bacteroidetes | |
| j | 99 | EU313811.1 | Uncultured | 99 | U703231.1 | Cytophagia | Bacteroidetes | |
| d | 91 | AB267717.1 | Uncultured | 99 | FJ916256.1 | Sphingobacteria | Bacteroidetes | |
| s | 88 | EU595360.1 | Uncultured bacterium clone DP10.3.3 | 99 | FJ612364.1 | Sphingobacteria | Bacteroidetes | |
| t | 81 | HM051286.1 | Uncultured | 87 | HM208523.1 | Sphingobacteria | Bacteroidetes | |
| w | 85 | EF446146 | Uncultured | 95 | DQ463716.2 | Sphingobacteria | Bacteroidetes |