| Literature DB >> 22949805 |
Lihui Wei1,2, Jiumao Lin1,2, Wei Xu3, Qiaoyan Cai1,2, Aling Shen1,2, Zhenfeng Hong1,2, Jun Peng1,2.
Abstract
Angiogenesis, which plays a critical role during tumor development, is tightly regulated by the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) pathway, which has been known to malfunction in many types of cancer. Therefore, inhibition of angiogenesis via modulation of the SHH signaling pathway has become very attractive for cancer chemotherapy. Scutellaria barbata D. Don (SB) has long been used in China to treat various cancers including colorectal cancer (CRC). Our published data suggested that the ethanol extract of SB (EESB) is able to induce apoptosis of colon cancer cells and inhibit angiogenesis in a chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane model. To further elucidate the precise mechanisms of its anti-tumor activity, in the present study we used a CRC mouse xenograft model to evaluate the effect of EESB on tumor growth and angiogenesis in vivo. Our current data indicated that EESB reduces tumor size without affecting on the body weight gain in CRC mice. In addition, EESB treatment suppresses the expression of key mediators of the SHH pathway in tumor tissues, which in turn resulted in the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis. Furthermore, EESB treatment inhibits the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), an important target gene of SHH signaling and functioning as one of the strongest stimulators of angiogenesis. Our findings suggest that inhibition of tumor angiogenesis via suppression of the SHH pathway might be one of the mechanisms by which Scutellaria barbata D. Don can be effective in the treatment of cancers.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese medicine; SHH pathway; Scutellaria barbata D. Don; angiogenesis; colorectal cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22949805 PMCID: PMC3431803 DOI: 10.3390/ijms13089419
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Effect of Ethanol extract of Scutellaria barbata D. Don (EESB) on tumor growth in colorectal cancer (CRC) xenograft mice. After tumor development, the mice were given intra-gastric administration with 2g/kg of EESB or saline daily, 5 days a week for 16 days. Tumor volume (A) and body weight (B) were measured during the experiment. Data shown were averages with S.D. (error bars) from 10 individual mice in each group. * p < 0.05, versus controls.
Figure 2Effect of EESB on the intratumoral microvessel density in CRC xenograft mice. Tumor tissues were processed for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for CD31. The photographs were representative images taken at a magnification of ×400. Quantification of IHC assay was represented as percentage of positively-stained cells. Data shown were averages with S.D. (error bars) from 10 individual mice in each group. * p < 0.05, versus controls.
Figure 3Effect of EESB on the activation of Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) pathway in CRC xenograft mice. (A) The mRNA expression levels of SHH, Patched-1 (PTCH-1, smoothened (SMO) and glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 (Gli-1) were determined by RT-PCR. GAPDH was used as the internal control. The data of densitometric analysis were normalized to the mean mRNA expression of untreated control (100%); (B) Tumor tissues were processed for IHC staining for SHH, PTCH-1, SMO and Gli-1. The photographs were representative images taken at a magnification of ×400. Quantification of IHC assay was represented as percentage of positively-stained cells. Data shown were averages with S.D. (error bars) from 10 individual mice in each group. * p < 0.05, versus controls.
Figure 4Effect of EESB on the expression of VEGF-A and VEGFR2 in CRC xenograft mice. (A) The mRNA expression levels of Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) and VEGF Receptor 2 (VEGFR2) were determined by RT-PCR. GAPDH was used as the internal control. The data of densitometric analysis were normalized to the mean mRNA expression of untreated control (100%); (B) Tumor tissues were processed for IHC staining for VEGF-A and VEGFR2. The photographs were representative images taken at a magnification of ×400. Quantification of IHC assay was represented as percentage of positively-stained cells. Data shown were averages with S.D. (error bars) from 10 individual mice in each group. * p < 0.05, versus controls.
Figure 5HPLC profiles of EESB (A) and a control sample (B). The mobile phase consisted of methanol:water:acetic acid = 35:61:4. The control sample was composed of scutellarein (peak 1) and baicalin (peak 2).