INTRODUCTION: There is increasing evidence that response to pharmacological treatment for nicotine dependence may be moderated by genetic polymorphisms. However, the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of genetically tailoring treatment in real-world clinical settings are unknown. METHODS: We conducted a multiphased, mixed-methods feasibility study with current smokers to develop and evaluate a patient-centered, theoretically grounded personalized medicine treatment protocol. The initial research phase included formative work to develop intervention materials. The second phase included a randomized pilot trial to evaluate the intervention. Trial participants (n = 36) were genotyped for ANKK1 rs1800497 and were randomized to receive genetic feedback (GF) plus standard behavioral counseling (BC) for smoking cessation or BC without GF. All participants received genetically tailored pharmacotherapy (nicotine patch or bupropion). RESULTS: The intervention was feasible to implement and was acceptable to participants based on satisfaction ratings and objective measures of participation. There was no evidence that the GF resulted in adverse psychological outcomes (e.g., depression, fatalism, reduced perceived control over quitting, differential motivation for quitting) based on quantitative or qualitative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Study results suggest that it is feasible to offer treatment within a health care setting that includes genetically tailored pharmacotherapy and doing so had no apparent adverse psychological impacts. Further evaluation of pharmacogenetically tailored smoking cessation interventions appears warranted.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: There is increasing evidence that response to pharmacological treatment for nicotine dependence may be moderated by genetic polymorphisms. However, the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of genetically tailoring treatment in real-world clinical settings are unknown. METHODS: We conducted a multiphased, mixed-methods feasibility study with current smokers to develop and evaluate a patient-centered, theoretically grounded personalized medicine treatment protocol. The initial research phase included formative work to develop intervention materials. The second phase included a randomized pilot trial to evaluate the intervention. Trial participants (n = 36) were genotyped for ANKK1rs1800497 and were randomized to receive genetic feedback (GF) plus standard behavioral counseling (BC) for smoking cessation or BC without GF. All participants received genetically tailored pharmacotherapy (nicotine patch or bupropion). RESULTS: The intervention was feasible to implement and was acceptable to participants based on satisfaction ratings and objective measures of participation. There was no evidence that the GF resulted in adverse psychological outcomes (e.g., depression, fatalism, reduced perceived control over quitting, differential motivation for quitting) based on quantitative or qualitative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Study results suggest that it is feasible to offer treatment within a health care setting that includes genetically tailored pharmacotherapy and doing so had no apparent adverse psychological impacts. Further evaluation of pharmacogenetically tailored smoking cessation interventions appears warranted.
Authors: Elaine Johnstone; Karen Brown; Cas Saunders; Kate Roberts; Mark Drury; Robert Walton; Mike Murphy Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jane E Sarginson; Joel D Killen; Laura C Lazzeroni; Stephen P Fortmann; Heather S Ryan; Alan F Schatzberg; Greer M Murphy Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2011-01-25 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Elyse R Park; Susan Kleimann; Emily J Youatt; Abigail Lockhart; Eric G Campbell; Douglas E Levy; Chanita Hughes Halbert; Erin Schmieder; Rasika Krishna; Alexandra E Shields Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2011-02-25 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Elaine C Johnstone; Patricia L Yudkin; Kate Hey; Sarah J Roberts; Sarah J Welch; Michael F Murphy; Siân E Griffiths; Robert T Walton Journal: Pharmacogenetics Date: 2004-02
Authors: John R Hughes; Josue P Keely; Ray S Niaura; Deborah J Ossip-Klein; Robyn L Richmond; Gary E Swan Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: K J Bough; C Lerman; J E Rose; F J McClernon; P J Kenny; R F Tyndale; S P David; E A Stein; G R Uhl; D V Conti; C Green; S Amur Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2013-03-18 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Li-Shiun Chen; Laurie Zawertailo; Thomas M Piasecki; Jaakko Kaprio; Marilyn Foreman; Hannah R Elliott; Sean P David; Andrew W Bergen; James W Baurley; Rachel F Tyndale; Timothy B Baker; Laura J Bierut; Nancy L Saccone Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Ewoud Schuit; Orestis A Panagiotou; Marcus R Munafò; Derrick A Bennett; Andrew W Bergen; Sean P David Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-09-08
Authors: Abel N Kho; Luke V Rasmussen; John J Connolly; Peggy L Peissig; Justin Starren; Hakon Hakonarson; M Geoffrey Hayes Journal: Genet Med Date: 2013-09-26 Impact factor: 8.822