Literature DB >> 22948841

High-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma are frequent in side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm measuring less than 3 cm on endoscopic ultrasound.

Joyce Wong1, Jill Weber, Barbara A Centeno, Shivakumar Vignesh, Cynthia L Harris, Jason B Klapman, Pamela Hodul.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas has increased over the last decade. While IPMN with main duct communication are generally recommended for resection, indications for resection of side-branch IPMN (SDIPMN) have been less clear. We reviewed our single institutional experience with SDIPMN and indications for resection.
METHODS: Patients who underwent resection for IPMN were identified from a prospectively maintained IRB-approved database. Patients with main pancreatic duct communication were excluded. Outcome, clinical and pathologic characteristics were correlated with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) findings.
RESULTS: From 2000 to 2010, 105 patients who underwent preoperative EUS evaluation and resection for SDIPMN were identified. The mean age was within the sixth decade of life, and there was a slight female predominance (55 vs. 45 %). The most common presenting symptom was abdominal pain (N = 47, 45 %), followed by jaundice (N = 24, 23 %) and weight loss (N = 24, 23 %). Only ten patients (10 %) were asymptomatic at presentation; seven (70 %) had suspicious features on EUS. Of the total cohort, few patients had intracystic septations (N = 27, 26 %) or presence of mural nodules (N = 2, 2 %) on EUS. Of 39 patients who had invasive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) on final pathology, EUS-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) demonstrated malignancy in only 21 (54 %). An additional seven (18 %) had EUS-FNA findings of atypia or concern for mucinous neoplasm. EUS evaluation of cyst size was correlated with final pathology. Of 70 patients with EUS cyst size <3 cm, 12 (17 %) had a preoperative EUS diagnosis of malignancy. Final pathology revealed 24 (34 %) to have PDAC: 1 of 7 (14 %) patients with cyst size <1 cm, 2 of 19 (11 %) with cyst size 1-2 cm, and 21of 44 (48 %) with cyst size 2-3 cm. Fifteen of 35 (43 %) patients with cyst size >3 cm had PDAC on final pathology. Of the patients with cyst size <3 cm, 16 (23 %) had high-grade dysplasia on final pathology: 3 of 7 (43 %) with cyst size <1 cm, 3 of 19 (16 %) with cyst size 1-2 cm, and 10 of 44 (23 %) with cyst size 2-3 cm. Seven of 35 (20 %) patients with cyst size >3 cm had high-grade dysplasia on final pathology. Although overall survival (OS) at 48 months stratified by EUS cyst size did not significantly differ between groups, patients with PDAC on final pathology had significantly worse OS compared to noninvasive pathology. A total of eight patients (8 %) developed recurrent disease, all of whom had PDAC on final pathology.
CONCLUSION: EUS is a helpful modality for the diagnostic evaluation of SDIPMN. Considering the high incidence of malignancy as well as high-grade dysplasia in SDIPMN greater than 2 cm, EUS features should be used in conjunction with other clinical criteria to guide management decisions. Patients with SDIPMN greater than 2 cm that do not undergo surgical resection may benefit from more intensive surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22948841     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-2017-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  26 in total

Review 1.  International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Masao Tanaka; Suresh Chari; Volkan Adsay; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo; Massimo Falconi; Michio Shimizu; Koji Yamaguchi; Kenji Yamao; Seiki Matsuno
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.996

2.  Survival after resection for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multi-institutional comparison according to American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage.

Authors:  Joshua A Waters; Thomas Schnelldorfer; Juan R Aguilar-Saavedra; Jey-Hsin Chen; Constantin T Yiannoutsos; Keith D Lillemoe; Michael B Farnell; Michael G Sarr; C Max Schmidt
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Development of pancreatic cancers during long-term follow-up of side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Authors:  Y Sawai; K Yamao; V Bhatia; T Chiba; N Mizuno; A Sawaki; K Takahashi; M Tajika; Y Shimizu; Y Yatabe; A Yanagisawa
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Cyst fluid interleukin-1beta (IL1beta) levels predict the risk of carcinoma in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Ajay V Maker; Nora Katabi; Li-Xuan Qin; David S Klimstra; Mark Schattner; Murray F Brennan; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  An increase in the number of predictive factors augments the likelihood of malignancy in branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.

Authors:  Takao Ohtsuka; Hiroshi Kono; Yosuke Nagayoshi; Yasuhisa Mori; Kosuke Tsutsumi; Yoshihiko Sadakari; Shunichi Takahata; Katsuya Morimatsu; Shinichi Aishima; Hisato Igarashi; Tetsuhide Ito; Kousei Ishigami; Masafumi Nakamura; Kazuhiro Mizumoto; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas comprise 2 clinical subtypes: differences in clinical characteristics and surgical management.

Authors:  M Kobari; S Egawa; K Shibuya; H Shimamura; M Sunamura; K Takeda; S Matsuno; T Furukawa
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-10

7.  Endoscopic ultrasound may be unnecessary in the preoperative evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.

Authors:  Molly M Cone; Jennifer D Rea; Brian S Diggs; Kevin G Billingsley; Brett C Sheppard
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Predictive factors for malignancy in intraductal papillary-mucinous tumours of the pancreas.

Authors:  M Sugiyama; Y Izumisato; N Abe; T Masaki; T Mori; Y Atomi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Experience with 208 resections for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.

Authors:  Thomas Schnelldorfer; Michael G Sarr; David M Nagorney; Lizhi Zhang; Thomas C Smyrk; Rui Qin; Suresh T Chari; Michael B Farnell
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-07

10.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: an updated experience.

Authors:  Taylor A Sohn; Charles J Yeo; John L Cameron; Ralph H Hruban; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Kurtis A Campbell; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Surgical management of pancreatic neoplasms: what's new?

Authors:  Andreas Karachristos; Nestor F Esnaola
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014-08

Review 2.  Managing Incidental Pancreatic Cysts.

Authors:  Jennifer Phan; V Raman Muthusamy
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-06-09

Review 3.  [Branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm - surgical approach].

Authors:  J Kaiser; M W Büchler; T Hackert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  International consensus on the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.

Authors:  Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-11

Review 5.  Pancreatic Cysts and Guidelines.

Authors:  James J Farrell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Pancreatic Resection for Side-Branch Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (SB-IPMN): a Contemporary Single-Institution Experience.

Authors:  John D Dortch; John A Stauffer; Horacio J Asbun
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Transmembrane mucin MUC13 distinguishes intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms from non-mucinous cysts and is associated with high-risk lesions.

Authors:  Zachary E Stiles; Sheema Khan; Kurt T Patton; Meena Jaggi; Stephen W Behrman; Subhash C Chauhan
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas associated with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) versus pseudo-IPMNs: relative frequency, clinicopathologic characteristics and differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Takashi Muraki; Kee-Taek Jang; Michelle D Reid; Burcin Pehlivanoglu; Bahar Memis; Olca Basturk; Pardeep Mittal; David Kooby; Shishir K Maithel; Juan M Sarmiento; Kathleen Christians; Susan Tsai; Douglas Evans; Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 9.  ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Pancreatic Cysts.

Authors:  Grace H Elta; Brintha K Enestvedt; Bryan G Sauer; Anne Marie Lennon
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Strategic Considerations.

Authors:  Vicente Morales-Oyarvide; Zhi Ven Fong; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.