BACKGROUND: Survival after resection for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (inv-IPMN) is superior to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This difference may be explained by earlier presentation of inv-IPMN. We hypothesized that inv-IPMN has survival comparable with PDAC after resection when matched by stage. STUDY DESIGN: From 1999 to 2009, 113 patients underwent resection for inv-IPMN at 2 large academic institutions. These data were compared with 845 patients during the same period undergoing resection for PDAC. Demographics, pathology, and overall survival (OS) were compared according to current American Joint Committee on Cancer stage. RESULTS: Mean age with inv-IPMN and PDAC was 68 and 65 years, respectively. Follow-up was 33 and 24 months for inv-IPMN and PDAC, respectively. Median OS was 32 months for inv-IPMN and 17 months in PDAC (p < 0.001). Median OS in lymph node-negative inv-IPMN was 41 months and 24 months in PDAC (p = 0.003), with the greatest absolute difference in stage Ia patients with OS of 80 and 50 months in inv-IPMN and PDAC, respectively (p = 0.03). In node-positive patients, OS was 20 months in inv-IPMN and 15 months in PDAC (p = 0.06). Of inv-IPMN, 24% was colloid versus 75% of tubular subtype; 37(85%) of node-positive inv-IPMN were tubular subtype. Median OS was 23 and 127 months for tubular and colloid subtypes, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When matched by stage, inv-IPMN has superior survival after resection compared with PDAC. This disparity is greatest in node-negative and least in node-positive disease. These findings suggest the behaviors of inv-IPMN and PDAC, although different, converge with advancing American Joint Committee on Cancer stage because of a greater proportion of tubular subtype.
BACKGROUND: Survival after resection for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (inv-IPMN) is superior to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This difference may be explained by earlier presentation of inv-IPMN. We hypothesized that inv-IPMN has survival comparable with PDAC after resection when matched by stage. STUDY DESIGN: From 1999 to 2009, 113 patients underwent resection for inv-IPMN at 2 large academic institutions. These data were compared with 845 patients during the same period undergoing resection for PDAC. Demographics, pathology, and overall survival (OS) were compared according to current American Joint Committee on Cancer stage. RESULTS: Mean age with inv-IPMN and PDAC was 68 and 65 years, respectively. Follow-up was 33 and 24 months for inv-IPMN and PDAC, respectively. Median OS was 32 months for inv-IPMN and 17 months in PDAC (p < 0.001). Median OS in lymph node-negative inv-IPMN was 41 months and 24 months in PDAC (p = 0.003), with the greatest absolute difference in stage Ia patients with OS of 80 and 50 months in inv-IPMN and PDAC, respectively (p = 0.03). In node-positive patients, OS was 20 months in inv-IPMN and 15 months in PDAC (p = 0.06). Of inv-IPMN, 24% was colloid versus 75% of tubular subtype; 37(85%) of node-positive inv-IPMN were tubular subtype. Median OS was 23 and 127 months for tubular and colloid subtypes, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When matched by stage, inv-IPMN has superior survival after resection compared with PDAC. This disparity is greatest in node-negative and least in node-positive disease. These findings suggest the behaviors of inv-IPMN and PDAC, although different, converge with advancing American Joint Committee on Cancer stage because of a greater proportion of tubular subtype.
Authors: Volkan Adsay; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Toru Furukawa; Olca Basturk; Giuseppe Zamboni; Giovanni Marchegiani; Claudio Bassi; Roberto Salvia; Giuseppe Malleo; Salvatore Paiella; Christopher L Wolfgang; Hanno Matthaei; G Johan Offerhaus; Mustapha Adham; Marco J Bruno; Michelle D Reid; Alyssa Krasinskas; Günter Klöppel; Nobuyuki Ohike; Takuma Tajiri; Kee-Taek Jang; Juan Carlos Roa; Peter Allen; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Jin-Young Jang; David S Klimstra; Ralph H Hruban Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Kee-Taek Jang; Sang Mo Park; Olca Basturk; Pelin Bagci; Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay; Edward B Stelow; Dustin M Walters; Dong Wook Choi; Seoung Ho Choi; Jin Seok Heo; Juan M Sarmiento; Michelle D Reid; Volkan Adsay Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Joseph R Habib; Benedict Kinny-Köster; Neda Amini; Sami Shoucair; John L Cameron; Elizabeth D Thompson; Elliot K Fishman; Ralph H Hruban; Ammar A Javed; Jin He; Christopher L Wolfgang Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2022-08-01 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Vincent Quoc-Huy Trinh; Joseph Thomas Roland; Jahg Wong; Frank Revetta; Krutika Patel; Chanjuan Shi; Kathleen E DelGiorno; Bruce D Carter; Marcus Chuan Beng Tan Journal: J Pathol Date: 2022-07-18 Impact factor: 9.883
Authors: Peter Bronsert; Ilona Kohler; Martin Werner; Frank Makowiec; Simon Kuesters; Jens Hoeppner; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Tobias Keck; Dirk Bausch; Ulrich Friedrich Wellner Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2013-09-22 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Jeremy Sharib; Laura Esserman; Eugene J Koay; Anirban Maitra; Yu Shen; Kimberly S Kirkwood; Elissa M Ozanne Journal: Surgery Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 3.982