Literature DB >> 22948797

The use of Permacol® injections for the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Zeiad I Hussain1, Michael Lim, Haider Mussa, Kazim Abbas, Stevan Stojkovic.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of Permacol(®) implant for the treatment of idiopathic faecal incontinence using a novel injection technique. Patients with idiopathic passive faecal incontinence were selected for trans-submucosal injection of Permacol(®) after assessment by anorectal physiology and endoanal ultrasonography. Clinical assessment and St. Mark's Incontinence Score were used to evaluate efficacy before and at two time points (1 and 2 years) after treatment. Rockwood Score were also used to determine quality of life before and after treatment. The Friedman and Chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical data, respectively. A p value of <0.05 was deemed significant. Thirty-eight patients (24 female), median age 66 years, were recruited. At maximum clinical follow-up (median of 9 months), response to Permacol(®) injections was categorised as excellent, good, fair and poor in 12, 5, 4 and 17 patients, respectively. St. Mark's Score improved in 72 and 63 % of patients at 1 and 2 years, respectively. However, a smaller proportion of patients (39 and 27 %, respectively) achieved a 50 %, or more, improvement in Mark's Score. All four domains of Rockwood Quality of Life Score improved on first and second year follow-up, however, only two domains, coping and embarrassment, were statistically significant. Permacol(®) injection improved symptoms by >50 % in 39 and 27 % of patients on short and medium-term follow-ups, respectively. The trans-submucosal technique for injection of Permacol(®) in this study was safe with no significant adverse outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22948797     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-012-0176-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  40 in total

1.  Injectable silicone biomaterial for fecal incontinence caused by internal anal sphincter dysfunction is effective.

Authors:  J J Tjandra; J F Lim; R Hiscock; P Rajendra
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Intersphincteric injected silicone biomaterial implants: a treatment for faecal incontinence.

Authors:  M M Soerensen; L Lundby; S Buntzen; S Laurberg
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Intra-anal collagen injection for the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  S G Stojkovic; M Lim; D Burke; P J Finan; P M Sagar
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Resistance to collagenase: a characteristic of collagen fibrils cross-linked by formaldehyde.

Authors:  E D Harris; M E Farrell
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1972-08-31

5.  Surgical management of anorectal incontinence due to internal anal sphincter deficiency.

Authors:  R Morgan; B Patel; J Beynon; N D Carr
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Internal anal sphincter augmentation for fecal incontinence using injectable silicone biomaterial.

Authors:  A J Malouf; C J Vaizey; C S Norton; M A Kamm
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Anal submucosal carbon bead injection for treatment of idiopathic fecal incontinence: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Felix Aigner; Friedrich Conrad; Raimund Margreiter; Michael Oberwalder
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Polytetrafluoroethylene injection for the treatment of partial fecal incontinence.

Authors:  A Shafik
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1993 Apr-Jun

9.  Artificial anal sphincter in severe fecal incontinence: outcome of prospective experience with 37 patients in one institution.

Authors:  Francis Michot; Bruno Costaglioli; Anne-Marie Leroi; Philippe Denis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Pilot study of two new injectable bulking agents for the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Y Maeda; C J Vaizey; M A Kamm
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Midterm outcomes of injectable bulking agents for fecal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  K D Hong; J S Kim; W B Ji; J W Um
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  An evaluation of the long-term effectiveness of Gatekeeper™ intersphincteric implants for passive faecal incontinence.

Authors:  S A A Jabbar; J Camilleri-Brennan
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.699

3.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Safety and Efficacy of Permacol Injection in the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Yahya A Al-Abed; Jennifer Ayers; Abraham Ayantunde; Bandipalyam V Praveen
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2016-04-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.