Literature DB >> 22948309

Integration, stability and expression of the E. coli phytase transgene in the Cassie line of Yorkshire Enviropig™.

Cecil W Forsberg1, Roy G Meidinger, Mingfu Liu, Michael Cottrill, Serguei Golovan, John P Phillips.   

Abstract

The genomic structure and generational stability of the transgene carried by the Cassie (CA) line of the transgenic Enviropig™, a prospective food animal, are reported here. This transgene is composed of the Escherichia coli phytase coding sequence regulated by the mouse parotid secretory protein promoter to direct secretion of phytase in the saliva. In the CA line the transgene integrated in chromosome 4 is present as a concatemer of three copies, two in a head to tail orientation and the third in a reverse orientation 3' to the other copies with a 6 kbp deletion in the 5' promoter region. The overall size of the integrated transgene complex is 46 kbp. During integration a 66 kbp segment of the chromosome was deleted, but a BLAST search of the segment from a GenBank clone did not reveal any essential genes. The transgene integration site was stable through 9 generations analyzed. Phytase activity in the saliva was similar among 11 day old hemizygous boars and gilts and remained relatively constant through nine generations of hemizygous pigs. However, as the pigs grew there generally was a gradual decrease in activity that stabilized when pigs reached the finisher phase of growth (4-6 months old). Homozygous pigs exhibited 1.5 fold higher phytase activity (P < 0.0001) than that of hemizygous littermates. Moreover, no differential salivary phytase activity was seen in hemizygotes arising from CA-Yorkshire and CA-Duroc breed outcrosses, suggesting that expression of the transgene is unaffected by genetic background. This data demonstrates that an exogenous phytase gene can be stably transmitted and expressed in the salivary glands of a domestic food animal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22948309     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-012-9646-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  20 in total

1.  Characterization and overproduction of the Escherichia coli appA encoded bifunctional enzyme that exhibits both phytase and acid phosphatase activities.

Authors:  S Golovan; G Wang; J Zhang; C W Forsberg
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Phytase and acid phosphatase activities in plant feedstuffs.

Authors:  A Viveros; C Centeno; A Brenes; R Canales; A Lozano
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 3.  Retrovirus reverse transcriptases containing a modified YXDD motif.

Authors:  Prem L Sharma; Viktoria Nurpeisov; Raymond F Schinazi
Journal:  Antivir Chem Chemother       Date:  2005

4.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities.

Authors:  B Ewing; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Phenotypic stability of Pro347Leu rhodopsin transgenic pigs as indicated by photoreceptor cell degeneration.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Sommer; Fulton Wong; Robert M Petters
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Cellular DNA rearrangements and early developmental arrest caused by DNA insertion in transgenic mouse embryos.

Authors:  L Covarrubias; Y Nishida; M Terao; P D'Eustachio; B Mintz
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Direct sequencing of PCR-amplified junction fragments from tandemly repeated transgenes.

Authors:  R M Rohan; D King; W I Frels
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection.

Authors:  R E Hammer; V G Pursel; C E Rexroad; R J Wall; D J Bolt; K M Ebert; R D Palmiter; R L Brinster
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jun 20-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Factors affecting the efficiency of introducing foreign DNA into mice by microinjecting eggs.

Authors:  R L Brinster; H Y Chen; M E Trumbauer; M K Yagle; R D Palmiter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid.

Authors:  P K Smith; R I Krohn; G T Hermanson; A K Mallia; F H Gartner; M D Provenzano; E K Fujimoto; N M Goeke; B J Olson; D C Klenk
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.365

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Strategies to enable the adoption of animal biotechnology to sustainably improve global food safety and security.

Authors:  Mark Tizard; Eric Hallerman; Scott Fahrenkrug; Martina Newell-McGloughlin; John Gibson; Frans de Loos; Stefan Wagner; Götz Laible; Jae Yong Han; Michael D'Occhio; Lisa Kelly; John Lowenthal; Kari Gobius; Primal Silva; Caitlin Cooper; Tim Doran
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Snapshots during the catalytic cycle of a histidine acid phytase reveal an induced fit structural mechanism.

Authors:  Isabella M Acquistapace; Monika A Ziętek; Arthur W H Li; Melissa Salmon; Imke Kühn; Mike R Bedford; Charles A Brearley; Andrew M Hemmings
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Improvements in pig agriculture through gene editing.

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Jonathan A Green; Bethany K Redel; Rodney D Geisert; Kiho Lee; Bhanu P Telugu; Kevin D Wells; Randall S Prather
Journal:  CABI Agric Biosci       Date:  2022-06-21

4.  The high-level accumulation of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in transgenic pigs harboring the n-3 fatty acid desaturase gene from Caenorhabditis briggsae.

Authors:  Yanrong Zhou; Yanli Lin; Xiaojie Wu; Chong Feng; Chuan Long; Fuyin Xiong; Ning Wang; Dengke Pan; Hongxing Chen
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Production of functional human nerve growth factor from the saliva of transgenic mice by using salivary glands as bioreactors.

Authors:  Fang Zeng; Zicong Li; Qingchun Zhu; Rui Dong; Chengcheng Zhao; Guoling Li; Guo Li; Wenchao Gao; Gelong Jiang; Enqin Zheng; Gengyuan Cai; Stefan Moisyadi; Johann Urschitz; Huaqiang Yang; Dewu Liu; Zhenfang Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Transgenic pigs to the rescue.

Authors:  Björn Petersen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Snapshots during the catalytic cycle of a histidine acid phytase reveal an induced-fit structural mechanism.

Authors:  Isabella M Acquistapace; Monika A Zi Etek; Arthur W H Li; Melissa Salmon; Imke Kühn; Mike R Bedford; Charles A Brearley; Andrew M Hemmings
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Production of Transgenic Pigs with an Introduced Missense Mutation of the Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor Type IB Gene Related to Prolificacy.

Authors:  Xueyan Zhao; Qiang Yang; Kewei Zhao; Chao Jiang; Dongren Ren; Pan Xu; Xiaofang He; Rongrong Liao; Kai Jiang; Junwu Ma; Shijun Xiao; Jun Ren; Yuyun Xing
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 9.  Strategies and challenges to increase the precision in feeding zinc to monogastric livestock.

Authors:  Daniel Brugger; Wilhelm M Windisch
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2017-03-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.