Literature DB >> 22947358

Comparative effectiveness analysis of amlodipine/renin-angiotensin system blocker combinations.

C Venkata S Ram1, Joseph Vasey, Sumeet Panjabi, Chunlin Qian, Ruth Quah.   

Abstract

A comparative effectiveness analysis of antihypertensive therapy amlodipine (AML) and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) fixed- and loose-dose combinations (FDCs and LDCs) in achieving blood pressure (BP) reduction and Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) goal attainment was made using retrospective electronic medical record (EMR) data. Treatment goal rates ranged from 35.0% for LDC AML/losartan to 45.7% for FDC AML/olmesartan (OM). FDC AML/OM achieved significantly greater reductions in systolic BP than FDC AML/benazepril (BEN), FDC AML/valsartan (VAL), and LDC AML/ARBs, respectively, and significantly greater reductions in diastolic BP than FDC AML/VAL and LDC therapy, respectively. Compared with patients treated with AML/OM, patients prescribed AML/VAL and LDC AML/ARB were significantly less likely to attain JNC 7 BP goal. Among subpopulations, AML/OM yielded higher rates of goal attainment among both African Americans and obese/overweight patients relative to AML/VAL and combined LDCs. Switchers from monotherapy with AML, OM, or VAL to AML/OM were significantly more likely to attain JNC 7 goals than those switching to AML/VAL or AML/BEN.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22947358      PMCID: PMC8108909          DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00695.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  28 in total

1.  US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988-2008.

Authors:  Brent M Egan; Yumin Zhao; R Neal Axon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Management of hypertension in patients with diabetes using an amlodipine-, olmesartan medoxomil-, and hydrochlorothiazide-based titration regimen.

Authors:  C Venkata Ram; Richard Sachson; Thomas Littlejohn; Chunlin Qian; Ali Shojaee; Kathy A Stoakes; Joel M Neutel
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 3.  Dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Benjamin J Epstein; Katherine Vogel; Biff F Palmer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Rationale for fixed-dose combinations in the treatment of hypertension: the cycle repeats.

Authors:  Domenic A Sica
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Economic evaluation of four angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  Lesley-Ann Miller; Rolin Wade; Dingwei Dai; Mark J Cziraky; Krishnan Ramaswamy; Sumeet Panjabi
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 6.  Amlodipine/benazepril: fixed dose combination therapy for hypertension.

Authors:  M A Faulkner; D E Hilleman
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 7.  Combination therapy with renin-angiotensin system blockers: will amlodipine replace hydrochlorothiazide?

Authors:  Thor Tejada; Alessia Fornoni; Oliver Lenz; Barry J Materson
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.369

8.  A titrate-to-goal study of switching patients uncontrolled on antihypertensive monotherapy to fixed-dose combinations of amlodipine and olmesartan medoxomil ± hydrochlorothiazide.

Authors:  Matthew R Weir; Willa A Hsueh; Shawna D Nesbitt; Thomas J Littlejohn; Alan Graff; Ali Shojaee; William F Waverczak; Chunlin Qian; Christopher J Jones; Joel M Neutel
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension.

Authors:  S Oparil; D Williams; S G Chrysant; T C Marbury; J Neutel
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Single-pill vs free-equivalent combination therapies for hypertension: a meta-analysis of health care costs and adherence.

Authors:  Beth Sherrill; Michael Halpern; Shahnaz Khan; Jie Zhang; Sumeet Panjabi
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of combining azilsartan medoxomil with amlodipine in patients with stage 2 hypertension.

Authors:  Michael A Weber; William B White; Domenic Sica; George L Bakris; Charlie Cao; Andrew Roberts; Stuart Kupfer
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.444

2.  A Retrospective, Observational, EMR-Based Real-World Evidence Study to Assess the Incidence of Pedal Edema in Essential Hypertensive Patients on Amlodipine or Cilnidipine.

Authors:  Jamshed Dalal; J P Sawhney; P B Jayagopal; P K Hazra; Mohammed Yunus Khan; Kumar Gaurav; Colette Pinto; Amey Mane; Sachin Rao; Madhur Jain
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.420

Review 3.  Single Pill Regimen Leads to Better Adherence and Clinical Outcome in Daily Practice in Patients Suffering from Hypertension and/or Dyslipidemia: Results of a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Burkhard Weisser; Hans-Georg Predel; Anton Gillessen; Claudia Hacke; Johannes Vor dem Esche; Gerd Rippin; Andrea Noetel; Olaf Randerath
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2020-03-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.