BACKGROUND: The flavonoid pathway is a long-standing and important tool for plant genetics, biochemistry, and molecular biology. Numerous flavonoid mutants have been identified in Arabidopsis over the past several decades in a variety of ecotypes. Here we present an analysis of Arabidopsis lines of ecotype Columbia carrying T-DNA insertions in genes encoding enzymes of the central flavonoid pathway. We also provide a comprehensive summary of various mutant alleles for these structural genes that have been described in the literature to date in a wide variety of ecotypes. FINDINGS: The confirmed knockout lines present easily-scorable phenotypes due to altered pigmentation of the seed coat (or testa). Knockouts for seven alleles for six flavonoid biosynthetic genes were confirmed by PCR and characterized by UPLC for altered flavonol content. CONCLUSION: Seven mutant lines for six genes of the central flavonoid pathway were characterized in ecotype, Columbia. These lines represent a useful resource for integrating biochemical and physiological studies with genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data, much of which has been, and continues to be, generated in the Columbia background.
BACKGROUND: The flavonoid pathway is a long-standing and important tool for plant genetics, biochemistry, and molecular biology. Numerous flavonoid mutants have been identified in Arabidopsis over the past several decades in a variety of ecotypes. Here we present an analysis of Arabidopsis lines of ecotype Columbia carrying T-DNA insertions in genes encoding enzymes of the central flavonoid pathway. We also provide a comprehensive summary of various mutant alleles for these structural genes that have been described in the literature to date in a wide variety of ecotypes. FINDINGS: The confirmed knockout lines present easily-scorable phenotypes due to altered pigmentation of the seed coat (or testa). Knockouts for seven alleles for six flavonoid biosynthetic genes were confirmed by PCR and characterized by UPLC for altered flavonol content. CONCLUSION: Seven mutant lines for six genes of the central flavonoid pathway were characterized in ecotype, Columbia. These lines represent a useful resource for integrating biochemical and physiological studies with genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data, much of which has been, and continues to be, generated in the Columbia background.
Flavonoids are a group of specialized plant metabolites that play critical roles in plant reproduction, defense from abiotic and biotic stress and are of growing interest as health-promoting compounds in human and animal diets [1-3]. As pigments, they have also figured into numerous seminal biological discoveries including Mendel’s elucidation of the laws of genetics, McClintock’s discovery of mobile genetic elements, and more recently the phenomenon of cosuppression, or RNA interference, in Petunia hybrida (reviewed in [4,5]). The flavonoid pathway continues to serve as an important experimental system in a variety of plant species, with studies ranging from understanding complex transcriptional control to biochemical structure-function relationships, intra- and intercellular transport, and the subcellular organization of pathways as multi-enzyme complexes [6-9]. Still, many questions remain about the specific biological targets of flavonoids in plants and animals [1,10], while engineering the production of specific flavonoids in plants and microorganisms is still far from straight-forward [11,12].Mutations within genes in the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway of Arabidopsis were described as early as 1971, easily identified by the transparent testa (tt) phenotype of the mutant seed coat [13] (Figure 1 and Table 1). Large-scale mutant screens carried out by Maarten Koornneef, initially aimed at characterizing the effects of fast-neutron and X-rays, identified many more flavonoid biosynthetic and regulatory genes [14,15]. Several other mutants were subsequently identified by Koornneef and others, almost all which have now been cloned and characterized [2]. While this represented an extremely useful toolset, these EMS and fast neutron induced mutations were isolated in a variety of ecotypes, primarily Landsberg but also several others, complicating the analysis of differences between mutants. While differences between ecotypes are sometimes minimal, morphological differences between ecotypes can be easily identified by eye, and research indicates that there are important differences between these backgrounds [16-18]. Here we describe the confirmation and preliminary characterization of mutant alleles for genes encoding flavonoid enzymes in Arabidopsis ecotype Columbia-0 (Col-0) that are available as part of the SALK collection of T-DNA insertion lines [19]. These lines represent a useful set of tools for analyzing the organization of flavonoid biosynthetic enzymes and their end products, as well the cellular, physiological and ecological roles of flavonoids. We also present a compilation of mutant alleles for flavonoid structural gene that have been described in the literature to date in a variety of different ecotypes.
Figure 1
Seed coat color phenotype of confirmed homozygous T-DNA lines with insertions disrupting genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis. From top center, clockwise seeds are: Col-0 WT, tt4-13, tt5-3, tt5-2, tt6-3, tt7-5, tt11-11, and ban-4.
Table 1
Summary of enzyme-encoding alleles described to date
Gene
Allele1
Line number2
Ecotype3
Mutagen4
First described
chalcone synthase (CHS)at5g13930
tt4-1
85
Ler
EMS
[14,20]
tt4-2
2YY6
Col
EMS
[21-23]
tt4-3
C1
Col
Carbon ions
[24]
tt4-4
C2
Col
Carbon ions
tt4-5
UV01
Ler
γ radiation
[25]
tt4-6
UV25
Ler
EMS
tt4-7
UV113
Ler
γ radiation
tt4-8
UV118a
Ler
γ radiation
tt4-9
38G1R
Ler
γ radiation
tt4-10
Est-1
EMS
[26]
tt4-11
DFW34
Ws-2
T-DNA
[27]
tt4-12
CS429127 / GK-304D03
Col
T-DNA
[28]
tt4-13
SALK_0205835
Col-0
T-DNA
[29,30]
tt4-14 through 21
zinc finger nucleases
[31]
chalcone isomerase (CHI)at3g55120
tt5-1
86
EMS
[14]
tt5-2
CS300857/ GK-176H03
Col
T-DNA
[28,30]; this report
tt5-3
SALK_034145
Col-0
T-DNA
This report
flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H)at3g51240
tt6-1
87
Ler
EMS
[14,32]
f3h-2::En
Col
Transposon
[32]
f3h-3::En
Col
Transposon
f3h-4f
Col
Transposon
f3h-5f
Col
Transposon
tt6-2
CS427992 / GK-292E08
Col-0
T-DNA
[28]
tt6-3
SALK_1139045
Col-0
T-DNA
[33]
tt6-4
SALK_023664
Col-0
T-DNA
Leaky allele – unpublished results
flavonoid 3'-hydroxylase (F3'H)at5g07990
tt7-1
88
Ler
EMS
[14,34]
tt7-2
Col-7
T-DNA
[35]
tt7-3
CS433473 / GK-349F05
Col-0
T-DNA
[28,30]
tt7-4
DJI11
Ws-2
T-DNA
[27]
tt7-5
SALK_053394
Col-0
T-DNA
[36]
dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR) at5g42800
tt3-1
84
Ler
EMS
[37]
tt3-2
CS428258 / GK-295C10
Col-0
T-DNA
[28]
tt3-3
Est-1
fast neutrons
[26]
GK-212G01
Col-0
T-DNA
Some segregants have pale brown seeds, none yellow
SALK_099848
Col-0
T-DNA
Does not have phenotype
anthocyanidin synthase (ANS/LDOX)at4g22880
tt11-1
Debeaujon and Koornneef, unpublished
tt11-2
Ler
EMS
[38]
tds4-1
Ws-4
T-DNA but not tagged (INRA)
[35]
tds4-2
SALK_028793
Col-0
T-DNA
[39]
tds4-3
CSHL GT9767
Ler
Gene trap
tt17
Est-1
Fast neutrons
[26]
tt18-1
AB084467
Col
Carbon ions
[40]
tt18-2
AB084468
Col
Carbon ions
tt18-3
Col
Carbon ions
tt11-11 (tds4-4)
SALK_073183
Col-0
T-DNA
[39]; this report.
anthocyanidin reductase (ANR/BAN) at1g61720
ban-1
Ws-2
T-DNA
[41]
ban-2
F36
En-1
unknown
[42]
ban-3
F52
En-1
unknown
ban-4
SALK_0402505
Col-0
T-DNA
This report
flavonol synthase 1 (FLS1)at5g08640
fls1-1
fls-1::En
Col
Transposon
[32,43]
fls-2f
Col
Transposon
[32]
fls-3f
Col
Transposon
fls-4d
Col
Transposon
fls1-2
RIKEN PST16145
No-0
T-DNA
[44]
fls1-3
INRA FLAG_533E06 (AJ588535/EGT283)
Ws
T-DNA
[45]
SALK_076420
Col-0
T-DNA
Recessive embryo lethal potentially due to disruption of adjacent divergently-transcribed gene [45]
FLS2at5g63580
fls2-1
SALK_023235
Col-0
T-DNA
[45]
fls2-2
GK-429B10
Col-0
T-DNA
[44]
FLS3at5g63590
fls3-1
SALK_050041
Col-0
T-DNA
[44,45]
FLS4at5g63595
fls4-1
SALK_002309
Col-0
T-DNA
FLS5at5g63600
fls5-1
CS430396 / GK-317E12
Col-0
T-DNA
FLS6at5g43935
fls6-1
SALK_0038795
Col-0
T-DNA
1 Alleles in bold are described in the current study.
2 GK = GABI-Kat.
3Standard ecotype abbreviations, as follows: Landsberg erecta (Ler); Columbia accession number 0 (Col-0) or accession unknown (Col), ; Enkheim (En-1); Estland (Est-1); Wassilewskija (Ws-2).
4 ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS).
5 independently-derived homozygote already available at ABRC.
Seed coat color phenotype of confirmed homozygous T-DNA lines with insertions disrupting genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis. From top center, clockwise seeds are: Col-0 WT, tt4-13, tt5-3, tt5-2, tt6-3, tt7-5, tt11-11, and ban-4.Summary of enzyme-encoding alleles described to date1 Alleles in bold are described in the current study.2 GK = GABI-Kat.3Standard ecotype abbreviations, as follows: Landsberg erecta (Ler); Columbia accession number 0 (Col-0) or accession unknown (Col), ; Enkheim (En-1); Estland (Est-1); Wassilewskija (Ws-2).4 ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS).5 independently-derived homozygote already available at ABRC.
Findings
Confirmation of homozygous tt alleles
T-DNA insertion lines in ecotype Col-0 were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC, Columbus, OH) for genes encoding six of the eight enzymes of the central flavonoid pathway: chalcone synthase (CHS, SALK_020583), chalcone isomerase (CHI, SALK_034145 and CS300857 from the GABI-Kat project), flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H, SALK_113904), flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase (F3′H, SALK_053394), anthocyanidin synthase (ANS, SALK_073183), and anthocyanidin reductase (ANR, SALK_040250). These lines were assigned allele numbers based on the previously-published alleles for each locus (Table 1). Note that a mutant allele for dihydroflavonol reductase (DFR) was recently identified in the Col-0 background that was not included in this study; no stable mutant allele has yet been identified in this ecotype for flavonol synthase 1 (FLS1).DNA was isolated from leaves of each T-DNA line to screen for lines homozygous for each insertion. The ability to produce a PCR product from Col-0 wild-type plants using primers that span the T-DNA insertion site (Figure 2) was used to identify the presence of an intact gene. The absence of an amplicon using the same primers for T-DNA lines indicates that the insertion is present, while products generated using one T-DNA-specific and one gene-specific primer indicate the presence of a T-DNA insertion in the gene of interest. The results illustrated in Figure 3 identify each line as containing a homozygous T-DNA insertion in the gene of interest, most within the respective open reading frames, with the exception of alleles of CHI (SALK_034145) and FLSI (AJ588535), which contain insertions within the promoters, and CHI (CS300857) and ANR (SALK_040250) with insertion in introns. It should be noted that these lines may contain additional T-DNA insertions at other sites of the genome; it has not yet been determined whether that is the case for any of the lines described here.
Figure 2
Schematic of homozygous T-DNA insertion lines. Boxes indicate exons, solid lines indicate introns and 5′ leader sequence, and dashed lines indicate genomic sequence. Insertion sites are indicated by black triangles. The arrows above the insertion indicate the direction of the T-DNA left-border primer sequence used for mapping the insertion sites. The fls1 line is described in Owens et al. [45]. Genes are chalcone synthase (CHS), chalcone isomerase (CHI), flavanone 3 hydroxylase (F3H), flavonoid 3′ hydroxylase (F3′H), flavonol synthase (FLS1), anthocyanidin synthase (ANS), and anthocyanidin reductase (ANR).
Figure 3
PCR confirmation of homozygous insertion lines for described alleles. T-DNA insertions were confirmed using T-DNA and gene-specific primers, while intact genes were confirmed using two gene-specific primers spanning the mapped T-DNA insertion site. Homozygous lines are indicated by the presence of a T-DNA insertion but not an intact gene.
Schematic of homozygous T-DNA insertion lines. Boxes indicate exons, solid lines indicate introns and 5′ leader sequence, and dashed lines indicate genomic sequence. Insertion sites are indicated by black triangles. The arrows above the insertion indicate the direction of the T-DNA left-border primer sequence used for mapping the insertion sites. The fls1 line is described in Owens et al. [45]. Genes are chalcone synthase (CHS), chalcone isomerase (CHI), flavanone 3 hydroxylase (F3H), flavonoid 3′ hydroxylase (F3′H), flavonol synthase (FLS1), anthocyanidin synthase (ANS), and anthocyanidin reductase (ANR).PCR confirmation of homozygous insertion lines for described alleles. T-DNA insertions were confirmed using T-DNA and gene-specific primers, while intact genes were confirmed using two gene-specific primers spanning the mapped T-DNA insertion site. Homozygous lines are indicated by the presence of a T-DNA insertion but not an intact gene.
End product and pigmentation analyses of tt alleles
Hydrolyzed flavonol extracts were analyzed by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) to provide phenotypic evidence of the gene disruptions identified by PCR. Five of the lines, tt4-13, tt5-2, tt5-3, tt6-3 and fls1-3, had no detectable levels of kaempferol or quercetin, the two major flavonol aglycones found in Arabidopsis (Figure 4). All five alleles affect enzymes upstream of flavonol production in the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. As in previous analyses of the tt7-1 allele in the Landsberg (Ler) background, which lacks the F3′H enzyme, tt7-5 in Col-0 also accumulated high levels of kaempferol but no detectable quercetin [46]. This is consistent with the catalytic role of F3′H in converting dihydrokaempferol to dihydroquercetin. The tt11-11 and ban-4 mutants contain insertions in the ANS and ANR genes, respectively. Both lines accumulated flavonols at levels comparable to wild type but displayed other phenotypes characteristic of defects in the respective genes. The tt11-11 seeds exhibited an intermediate tt phenotype (Figure 1), but adult plants were devoid of red pigmentation, consistent with an absence of anthocyanins, while ban-4 exhibited a red seed coat in immature seeds and a darker black seed coat in fully desiccated seeds, as described previously for ban-1[41].
Figure 4
UPLC analysis of flavonol aglycone profiles in T-DNA insertion lines.A) UPLC traces of hydrolyzed extracts prepared from 5-day-old seedlings, with arrows indicating the retention times of the flavonols, quercetin (Q) and kaempferol (K). B) Comparison of kaempferol and quercetin levels determined from integrated peak areas.
UPLC analysis of flavonol aglycone profiles in T-DNA insertion lines.A) UPLC traces of hydrolyzed extracts prepared from 5-day-old seedlings, with arrows indicating the retention times of the flavonols, quercetin (Q) and kaempferol (K). B) Comparison of kaempferol and quercetin levels determined from integrated peak areas.
Conclusions
The flavonoid mutants described in this report represent a useful toolset for the study of many aspects of plant metabolism, cell biology, and physiology. The flavonoid pathway provides a unique model system for studying metabolic pathways as it has been well-characterized in a variety of model organisms and is essential for a wide range of cellular and physiological processes. Mutations for genes encoding many of the enzymes now exist in a uniform genetic background. While this communication focuses on flavonoid biosynthetic enzymes, mutant alleles exist for genes involved in mediating other aspects of flavonoid metabolism, including transcriptional regulation of gene expression and modification and cellular transport of pathway end products [47,48].The flavonoid enzymes disrupted by T-DNA insertions have been hypothesized to participate in metabolic channeling via protein-protein interactions [7,49]. These mutations, all within the same genetic background, could greatly enhance our understanding of the regulation and dynamics of this channeling, which has broad reaching implications across metabolic research areas. The CHS mutant allele, tt4-13, has already been used by our group and others to further probe the involvement of this pathway in modulating the distribution of auxin and ethylene within Arabidopsis seedling roots [7,29,36,50], to characterize the distribution of flux among branch pathways of flavonoid metabolism [45], and to identify molecules that promote pollen fertilization in Arabidopsis[51]. The CHI allele, tt5-3, has been used in a metabolic profiling analysis of the response to UV light [52], whereas tt5-2 was used to demonstrate a requirement for this CHI gene, among flavonoid genes, for flavonol synthesis in pollen [30]. The flavanone 3-hydroxylase mutant, tt6-3, has been used to characterize the biochemical activities of ArabidopsisF3H and Sorghum FNS [33,53], while the flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase line, tt7-5, was used by our group in the auxin-ethylene study [36], and tt11-11, was already used several years ago to show that TDS4 is allelic to tt18 (now renamed tt11 per the findings of [38]) and encodes LDOX/ANS. The F3H and LDOX lines, tt6-3 and tt11-11, have been used to demonstrate the utility of a novel metabolic profiling method for intact seed [54].The collection of tt mutants presented here represent a means to several ends. As our understanding of the roles flavonoid compounds play in human health evolve, so too may our need to develop new crop lines to deliver increased amounts of these compounds in our diet. In addition, the flavonoid pigmentation compounds are of great horticultural importance. For these two reasons alone a thorough understanding of the dynamic metabolic processes involved in flavonoid production is important, but there are broader benefits to many areas of cellular and plant biology.
Methods
Analysis of flavonol profiles
Arabidopsis (Columbia ecotype) wild-type and transgenic seeds were surface-sterilized as described previously [25]. Approximately 5 mg of seeds were dispersed on agar plates containing Murashige and Skoog salts with 1% sucrose and incubated 2 d in the dark at 4°C. The seeds were then grown on the surface of the agar medium under continuous white light (100 μE m-2 s-1) at 21°C as previously described [55]. Flavonols were extracted from frozen tissue by grinding 20 seedlings in 200 μl 1% acetic acid in 80% methanol and incubating overnight at 4°C. The samples were clarified by centrifugation twice at 13,000 rpm, 4°C for 15 min each time. The samples were hydrolyzed as described in Burbulis et al. [21], followed by the addition of an equal volume of 100% methanol and centrifugation as before.Flavonols in wild-type and transgenic seedlings were profiled using a Waters Acquity UPLC system with a UPLC phenyl C18 column (2.1 mm x 100 mm, Waters) and a linear elution gradient from 100% solvent A (0.1% formic acid in water) to 40% solvent B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) over 13 min at 4°C, modified from Yonekura-Sakakibara [56]. Chromatograms were collected at 320 nm and 365 nm.
Confirmation of knockouts by T-DNA insertion
Lines for each tt allele in Col-0 were ordered from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC; The Ohio State University) and bred to homozygosity from a segregating population. The mapped locations of each T-DNA insertion were created using the T-DNA flanking sequence identified via the ABRC sequence viewer (Figure 2). To confirm that each line was homozygous, genomic DNA was extracted from one large leaf from each plant according to Edwards et al. [57] with slight modifications. Genomic DNA from Col-0 wild-type plants of approximately the same age was also extracted in the same manner to serve as a control template. Extracted genomic DNA was resuspended overnight in 100 μl ddH2O. PCR was performed using 1 to 2 μl of each sample with the primers listed in Table 2 in a total volume of 10–20 μl. PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Seeds for the tt5-3, tt7-5, and tt11-11 homozygous lines have been deposited with the ABRC; homozygous lines are available at the ABRC for the other four lines through the SALK Confirmed T-DNA Project.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
PAB characterized several of the T-DNA insertions by PCR, produced the photograph showing the differences in seed coat color, and drafted the manuscript. MVR characterized several additional T-DNA insertions by PCR and participated in editing the manuscript. MM and RFH contributed the UPLC analysis. BSJW designed the study and participated in drafting and editing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors: D E Brown; A M Rashotte; A S Murphy; J Normanly; B W Tague; W A Peer; L Taiz; G K Muday Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: J N Maloof; J O Borevitz; T Dabi; J Lutes; R B Nehring; J L Redfern; G T Trainer; J M Wilson; T Asami; C C Berry; D Weigel; J Chory Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: José M Alonso; Anna N Stepanova; Thomas J Leisse; Christopher J Kim; Huaming Chen; Paul Shinn; Denise K Stevenson; Justin Zimmerman; Pascual Barajas; Rosa Cheuk; Carmelita Gadrinab; Collen Heller; Albert Jeske; Eric Koesema; Cristina C Meyers; Holly Parker; Lance Prednis; Yasser Ansari; Nathan Choy; Hashim Deen; Michael Geralt; Nisha Hazari; Emily Hom; Meagan Karnes; Celene Mulholland; Ral Ndubaku; Ian Schmidt; Plinio Guzman; Laura Aguilar-Henonin; Markus Schmid; Detlef Weigel; David E Carter; Trudy Marchand; Eddy Risseeuw; Debra Brogden; Albana Zeko; William L Crosby; Charles C Berry; Joseph R Ecker Journal: Science Date: 2003-08-01 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Csanad Gurdon; Alexander Kozik; Rong Tao; Alexander Poulev; Isabel Armas; Richard W Michelmore; Ilya Raskin Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Benjamin Jaegle; Miran Kalle Uroic; Xu Holtkotte; Christina Lucas; Andreas Ole Termath; Hans-Günther Schmalz; Marcel Bucher; Ute Hoecker; Martin Hülskamp; Andrea Schrader Journal: BMC Plant Biol Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 4.215
Authors: Jonathan I Watkinson; Peter A Bowerman; Kevin C Crosby; Sherry B Hildreth; Richard F Helm; Brenda S J Winkel Journal: PeerJ Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 2.984