Literature DB >> 22947043

Optimizing predictive performance of CASE Ultra expert system models using the applicability domains of individual toxicity alerts.

Suman K Chakravarti1, Roustem D Saiakhov, Gilles Klopman.   

Abstract

Fragment based expert system models of toxicological end points are primarily comprised of a set of substructures that are statistically related to the toxic property in question. These special substructures are often referred to as toxicity alerts, toxicophores, or biophores. They are the main building blocks/classifying units of the model, and it is important to define the chemical structural space within which the alerts are expected to produce reliable predictions. Furthermore, defining an appropriate applicability domain is required as part of the OECD guidelines for the validation of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs). In this respect, this paper describes a method to construct applicability domains for individual toxicity alerts that are part of the CASE Ultra expert system models. Defining applicability domain for individual alerts was necessary because each CASE Ultra model is comprised of multiple alerts, and different alerts of a model usually represent different toxicity mechanisms and cover different structural space; the use of an applicability domain for the overall model is often not adequate. The domain for each alert was constructed using a set of fragments that were found to be statistically related to the end point in question as opposed to using overall structural similarity or physicochemical properties. Use of the applicability domains in reducing false positive predictions is demonstrated. It is now possible to obtain ROC (receiver operating characteristic) profiles of CASE Ultra models by applying domain adherence cutoffs on the alerts identified in test chemicals. This helps in optimizing the performance of a model based on their true positive-false positive prediction trade-offs and reduce drastic effects on the predictive performance caused by the active/inactive ratio of the model's training set. None of the major currently available commercial expert systems for toxicity prediction offer the possibility to explore a model's full range of sensitivity-specificity spectrum, and therefore, the methodology developed in this study can be of benefit in improving the predictive ability of the alert based expert systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22947043     DOI: 10.1021/ci300111r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  12 in total

Review 1.  In Silico Models for Skin Sensitization and Irritation.

Authors:  Gianluca Selvestrel; Federica Robino; Matteo Zanotti Russo
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  MultiCASE Platform for In Silico Toxicology.

Authors:  Suman K Chakravarti; Roustem D Saiakhov
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Increasing the Value of Data Within a Large Pharmaceutical Company Through In Silico Models.

Authors:  Alessandro Brigo; Doha Naga; Wolfgang Muster
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 4.  In Silico Models for Predicting Acute Systemic Toxicity.

Authors:  Ivanka Tsakovska; Antonia Diukendjieva; Andrew P Worth
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  Transitioning to composite bacterial mutagenicity models in ICH M7 (Q)SAR analyses.

Authors:  Curran Landry; Marlene T Kim; Naomi L Kruhlak; Kevin P Cross; Roustem Saiakhov; Suman Chakravarti; Lidiya Stavitskaya
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  Critical evaluation of human oral bioavailability for pharmaceutical drugs by using various cheminformatics approaches.

Authors:  Marlene T Kim; Alexander Sedykh; Suman K Chakravarti; Roustem D Saiakhov; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Chemistry-Wide Association Studies (CWAS): A Novel Framework for Identifying and Interpreting Structure-Activity Relationships.

Authors:  Yen S Low; Vinicius M Alves; Denis Fourches; Alexander Sedykh; Carolina Horta Andrade; Eugene N Muratov; Ivan Rusyn; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Leveraging complementary computational models for prioritizing chemicals of developmental and reproductive toxicity concern: an example of food contact materials.

Authors:  Chun-Wei Tung; Hsien-Jen Cheng; Chia-Chi Wang; Shan-Shan Wang; Pinpin Lin
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 9.  Building a virtual ligand screening pipeline using free software: a survey.

Authors:  Enrico Glaab
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 11.622

10.  Cheminformatics-aided pharmacovigilance: application to Stevens-Johnson Syndrome.

Authors:  Yen S Low; Ola Caster; Tomas Bergvall; Denis Fourches; Xiaoling Zang; G Niklas Norén; Ivan Rusyn; Ralph Edwards; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.