Literature DB >> 2294684

Failure of balloon aortic valvuloplasty to result in sustained clinical improvement in patients with depressed left ventricular function.

C J Davidson1, J K Harrison, M E Leithe, K B Kisslo, T M Bashore.   

Abstract

Although balloon aortic valvuloplasty usually results in acute hemodynamic improvement, recurrent symptoms often occur within several months. The current study was designed to determine whether clinical characteristics, including invasive hemodynamic parameters of left ventricular (LV) performance, are predictive of short-term patient outcome. Eighty-one consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled in the study protocol. High-fidelity dual sensor micromanometer catheters, digital ventriculography and aortography and Fick cardiac output were measured before and immediately after balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Stroke work was defined from pressure-volume loops. The acute hemodynamic results obtained in patients with overall improved symptoms were compared to those with recurrent symptoms at 3 months. Fifty-three patients (65%) were improved at 3-month evaluation (group 1), whereas 28 patients (35%) had either returned to symptoms at baseline (17), had undergone aortic valve replacement (3) or had cardiac death (8). Compared to patients with improved symptoms, patients with recurrent symptoms demonstrated a lower cardiac output, higher LV end-systolic volume, decreased LV ejection fraction, diminished LV stroke work and decreased LV peak positive dP/dt. The final aortic valve area and change in aortic valve area did not predict which patients would develop recurrent symptoms. Stepwise logistic regression revealed that LV ejection fraction was the only independent predictor of overall status at 3 months (p = 0.002). Eighty-four percent of patients with an ejection fraction greater than 45% were improved. In the group with an ejection fraction greater than 45%, less than half of the patients demonstrated improved symptoms at short-term followup. Parameters of LV performance can accurately predict short-term patient outcome after balloon aortic valvuloplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2294684     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90028-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure as an independent predictor of outcome during balloon aortic valvuloplasty.

Authors:  Roberto J Cubeddu; Creighton W Don; Sofia A Horvath; Pritha P Gupta; Ignacio Cruz-Gonzalez; Christian Witzke; Ignacio Inglessis; Igor F Palacios
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Percutaneous Aortic Balloon Valvuloplasty and Intracardiac Adrenaline in Electromechanical Dissociation as Bridge to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Jawad Chaara; Pascal Meier; Christophe Ellenberger; Yvan Gasche; Karim Bendjelid; Stephane Noble; Marco Roffi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as a bridge to aortic valve replacement in cancer patients who require urgent non-cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Polonca Kogoj; Rok Devjak; Matjaz Bunc
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Aortic balloon valvuloplasty as a bridge-to-decision in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Jacek Wacławski; Krzysztof Wilczek; Bartosz Hudzik; Damian Pres; Michał Hawranek; Krzysztof Milewski; Piotr Chodór; Michał Zembala; Mariusz Gąsior
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 1.426

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.