Literature DB >> 2294682

Assessment of four ambulatory blood pressure monitors and measurements by clinicians versus intraarterial blood pressure at rest and during exercise.

W B White1, P Lund-Johansen, P Omvik.   

Abstract

The accuracy of 4 different ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitors was assessed by comparing them to simultaneous intraarterial BP (contralateral brachial artery) during rest, isometric and dynamic (bicycle) exercise in 48 hypertensive patients undergoing invasive hemodynamic evaluation. The differences between the intraarterially determined BP and values obtained by the various monitors were then compared to differences between BP measured directly and by 2 clinicians using a standard mercury column in 10 additional hypertensive patients. The monitors studied were the Accutracker II (auscultatory with mandatory electrocardiographic gating), Colin ABPM 630 (auscultatory or oscillometric), Del Mar Pressurometer IV (auscultatory with optional electrocardiographic gating) and SpaceLabs 90202 (oscillometric). During rest, the differences between intraarterially and clinician-determined systolic and diastolic BP were 4 +/- 8 and -4 +/- 6 mm Hg, respectively. The Accutracker II and Colin ABPM 630 using the auscultatory method showed less disparity and closer limits of agreement (2 standard deviations of the mean difference) with intraarterial BP than the clinicians' measurements, whereas the other units showed similar or greater limits of agreement. During both isometric and dynamic exercise, mean BP differences between intraarterial and clinician determinations were similar to those at rest but the limits of agreement increased. The limits of agreement between intraarterial and monitor-derived BP also increased during exercise compared to differences observed at rest. The Accutracker II and Colin ABPM 630 using the auscultatory method had limits of agreement with intraarterial BP that were either similar to or less than the clinician's, whereas the Colin monitor using the oscillometric method and the Del Mar Pressurometer IV showed greater disparity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2294682     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90026-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  15 in total

1.  Blood pressure changes associated with tilting in normotensive subjects: differences in response pattern as measured by oscillometry and auscultation.

Authors:  M B Sidery; I A Macdonald
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.435

2.  A prognostic index for risk stratification for acute heart failure and death in subjects with ischemic cardiomyopathy and cardiac defibrillator.

Authors:  Lanfranco Antonini; Cristina Mollica; Antonio Auriti; Christian Pristipino; Vincenzo Pasceri; Francesca Leone; Salvatore Greco
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  A Meta-analysis to Determine the Validity of Taking Blood Pressure Using the Indirect Cuff Method.

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Minsoo Kang; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Psychophysiological effects of habitual caffeine consumption.

Authors:  J E James
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  1994

5.  Seasonal changes in ambulatory blood pressure in employees under different indoor temperatures.

Authors:  E Kristal-Boneh; G Harari; M S Green; J Ribak
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  The relationship between 24-hour ambulatory blood pressures and laboratory measures of cardiovascular reactivity.

Authors:  P J Cornish; E B Blanchard; J Jaccard
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1994-09

Review 7.  Noninvasive 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: current status.

Authors:  A Stanton; E O'Brien
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Statistical evaluation of circadian blood pressure rhythm during isradipine long-term therapy.

Authors:  F Veglio; F Rabbia; R Melchio; L Chiandussi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Modern approaches to blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  J A Staessen; E T O'Brien; L Thijs; R H Fagard
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Normal exercise blood pressure response in African-American women with parental history of hypertension.

Authors:  Vernon Bond; Richard M Millis; R G Adams; Deborah Williams; Thomas O Obisesan; Luc M Oke; Raymond Blakely; Paul Vaccaro; B Don Franks; Marguerite Neita; Gwendolyn C Davis; Ometha Lewis-Jack; Charles O Dotson
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.378

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.