Literature DB >> 22946475

Age-dependence of power spectral density and fractal dimension of bone mineralized matrix in atomic force microscope topography images: potential correlates of bone tissue age and bone fragility in female femoral neck trabeculae.

Petar Milovanovic1, Marija Djuric, Zlatko Rakocevic.   

Abstract

There is an increasing interest in bone nano-structure, the ultimate goal being to reveal the basis of age-related bone fragility. In this study, power spectral density (PSD) data and fractal dimensions of the mineralized bone matrix were extracted from atomic force microscope topography images of the femoral neck trabeculae. The aim was to evaluate age-dependent differences in the mineralized matrix of human bone and to consider whether these advanced nano-descriptors might be linked to decreased bone remodeling observed by some authors and age-related decline in bone mechanical competence. The investigated bone specimens belonged to a group of young adult women (n = 5, age: 20-40 years) and a group of elderly women (n = 5, age: 70-95 years) without bone diseases. PSD graphs showed the roughness density distribution in relation to spatial frequency. In all cases, there was a fairly linear decrease in magnitude of the power spectra with increasing spatial frequencies. The PSD slope was steeper in elderly individuals (-2.374 vs. -2.066), suggesting the dominance of larger surface morphological features. Fractal dimension of the mineralized bone matrix showed a significant negative trend with advanced age, declining from 2.467 in young individuals to 2.313 in the elderly (r = 0.65, P = 0.04). Higher fractal dimension in young women reflects domination of smaller mineral grains, which is compatible with the more freshly remodeled structure. In contrast, the surface patterns in elderly individuals were indicative of older tissue age. Lower roughness and reduced structural complexity (decreased fractal dimension) of the interfibrillar bone matrix in the elderly suggest a decline in bone toughness, which explains why aged bone is more brittle and prone to fractures.
© 2012 The Authors Journal of Anatomy © 2012 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22946475      PMCID: PMC3482350          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01556.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  54 in total

1.  Do regional modifications in tissue mineral content and microscopic mineralization heterogeneity adapt trabecular bone tracts for habitual bending? Analysis in the context of trabecular architecture of deer calcanei.

Authors:  John G Skedros; Alex N Knight; Ryan W Farnsworth; Roy D Bloebaum
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  The role of collagen in bone strength.

Authors:  S Viguet-Carrin; P Garnero; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Indentation properties of young and old osteons.

Authors:  S S Huja; F M Beck; D T Thurman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Nanogranular origins of the strength of bone.

Authors:  Kuangshin Tai; Franz-Josef Ulm; Christine Ortiz
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  Nanostructure and mineral composition of trabecular bone in the lateral femoral neck: implications for bone fragility in elderly women.

Authors:  Petar Milovanovic; Jelena Potocnik; Milovan Stoiljkovic; Danijela Djonic; Slobodan Nikolic; Olivera Neskovic; Marija Djuric; Zlatko Rakocevic
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  FTIR microspectroscopic analysis of normal human cortical and trabecular bone.

Authors:  E P Paschalis; F Betts; E DiCarlo; R Mendelsohn; A L Boskey
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  In situ observation of fluoride-ion-induced hydroxyapatite-collagen detachment on bone fracture surfaces by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  J H Kindt; P J Thurner; M E Lauer; B L Bosma; G Schitter; G E Fantner; M Izumi; J C Weaver; D E Morse; P K Hansma
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 3.874

8.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Region-specific sex-dependent pattern of age-related changes of proximal femoral cancellous bone and its implications on differential bone fragility.

Authors:  Marija Djuric; Danijela Djonic; Petar Milovanovic; Slobodan Nikolic; Robert Marshall; Jelena Marinkovic; Michael Hahn
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 10.  Bone mineralization density distribution in health and disease.

Authors:  P Roschger; E P Paschalis; P Fratzl; K Klaushofer
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  3 in total

1.  Porotic paradox: distribution of cortical bone pore sizes at nano- and micro-levels in healthy vs. fragile human bone.

Authors:  Petar Milovanovic; Zorica Vukovic; Djordje Antonijevic; Danijela Djonic; Vladimir Zivkovic; Slobodan Nikolic; Marija Djuric
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Micro/Nanostructures and Mechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone in Ovariectomized Rats.

Authors:  Shidi Hu; Jin Li; Lu Liu; Ruchun Dai; Zhifeng Sheng; Xianping Wu; Xiqiao Feng; Xuefeng Yao; Eryuan Liao; Evan Keller; Yebin Jiang
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.257

3.  At the moment of occurrence of a fragility hip fracture, men have higher mechanical properties values in comparison with women.

Authors:  Ana C Vale; Inês P Aleixo; Miguel Lúcio; André Saraiva; Joana Caetano-Lopes; Ana Rodrigues; Pedro M Amaral; Luís G Rosa; Jacinto Monteiro; João E Fonseca; Maria F Vaz; Helena Canhão
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.