Literature DB >> 22944089

Experience with the first 50 ex vivo lung perfusions in clinical transplantation.

Marcelo Cypel1, Jonathan C Yeung, Tiago Machuca, Manyin Chen, Lianne G Singer, Kazuhiro Yasufuku, Marc de Perrot, Andrew Pierre, Thomas K Waddell, Shaf Keshavjee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion is a novel method to evaluate and improve the function of injured donor lungs. We reviewed our experience with 50 consecutive transplants after ex vivo lung perfusion.
METHODS: A retrospective study using prospectively collected data was performed. High-risk brain death donor lungs (defined as Pao(2)/Fio(2) <300 mm Hg or lungs with radiographic or clinical findings of pulmonary edema) and lungs from cardiac death donors were subjected to 4 to 6 hours of ex vivo lung perfusion. Lungs that achieved stable airway and vascular pressures and Pao(2)/Fio(2) greater than 400 mm Hg during ex vivo lung perfusion were transplanted. The primary end point was the incidence of primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours after transplantation. End points were compared with lung transplants not treated with ex vivo lung perfusion (controls).
RESULTS: A total of 317 lung transplants were performed during the study period (39 months). Fifty-eight ex vivo lung perfusion procedures were performed, resulting in 50 transplants (86% use). Of these, 22 were from cardiac death donors and 28 were from brain death donors. The mean donor Pao(2)/Fio(2) was 334 mm Hg in the ex vivo lung perfusion group and 452 mm Hg in the control group (P = .0001). The incidence of primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours was 2% in the ex vivo lung perfusion group and 8.5% in the control group (P = .14). One patient (2%) in the ex vivo lung perfusion group and 7 patients (2.7%) in the control group required extracorporeal lung support for primary graft dysfunction (P = 1.00). The median time to extubation, intensive care unit stay, and hospital length of stay were 2, 4, and 20 days, respectively, in the ex vivo lung perfusion group and 2, 4, and 23 days, respectively, in the control group (P > .05). Thirty-day mortality (4% in the ex vivo lung perfusion group and 3.5% in the control group, P = 1.00) and 1-year survival (87% in the ex vivo lung perfusion group and 86% in the control group, P = 1.00) were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation of high-risk donor lungs after 4 to 6 hours of ex vivo lung perfusion is safe, and outcomes are similar to those of conventional transplants. Ex vivo lung perfusion improved our center use of donor lungs, accounting for 20% of our current lung transplant activity.
Copyright © 2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22944089     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  60 in total

Review 1.  Ex vivo lung perfusion prior to transplantation: an overview of current clinical practice worldwide.

Authors:  Julien Possoz; Arne Neyrinck; Dirk Van Raemdonck
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Bioengineering approaches to organ preservation ex vivo.

Authors:  Meghan Pinezich; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-03-19

Review 3.  The promise of organ and tissue preservation to transform medicine.

Authors:  Sebastian Giwa; Jedediah K Lewis; Luis Alvarez; Robert Langer; Alvin E Roth; George M Church; James F Markmann; David H Sachs; Anil Chandraker; Jason A Wertheim; Martine Rothblatt; Edward S Boyden; Elling Eidbo; W P Andrew Lee; Bohdan Pomahac; Gerald Brandacher; David M Weinstock; Gloria Elliott; David Nelson; Jason P Acker; Korkut Uygun; Boris Schmalz; Brad P Weegman; Alessandro Tocchio; Greg M Fahy; Kenneth B Storey; Boris Rubinsky; John Bischof; Janet A W Elliott; Teresa K Woodruff; G John Morris; Utkan Demirci; Kelvin G M Brockbank; Erik J Woods; Robert N Ben; John G Baust; Dayong Gao; Barry Fuller; Yoed Rabin; David C Kravitz; Michael J Taylor; Mehmet Toner
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  How to establish a successful ex vivo lung perfusion program.

Authors:  George Makdisi; Thomas C Wozniak
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-05

Review 5.  Evaluation and Management of the Potential Lung Donor.

Authors:  Andrew Courtwright; Edward Cantu
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.878

6.  Prolonged EVLP Using OCS Lung: Cellular and Acellular Perfusates.

Authors:  Gabriel Loor; Brian T Howard; John R Spratt; Lars M Mattison; Angela Panoskaltsis-Mortari; Roland Z Brown; Tinen L Iles; Carolyn M Meyer; Haylie R Helms; Andrew Price; Paul A Iaizzo
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Machine perfusion of thoracic organs.

Authors:  Dirk Van Raemdonck; Filip Rega; Steffen Rex; Arne Neyrinck
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Optimizing organs for transplantation; advancements in perfusion and preservation methods.

Authors:  Elizabeth Soo; Christopher Marsh; Robert Steiner; Lisa Stocks; Dianne B McKay
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 9.  Breathing lung transplantation with the Organ Care System (OCS) Lung: lessons learned and future implications.

Authors:  William Lightle; Daoud Daoud; Gabriel Loor
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Machine perfusion enhances hepatocyte isolation yields from ischemic livers.

Authors:  Maria-Louisa Izamis; Sinem Perk; Candice Calhoun; Korkut Uygun; Martin L Yarmush; François Berthiaume
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.487

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.